切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 14 -19. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2018.01.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

心脏死亡器官捐献供肾热缺血因素对移植肾功能的影响
林锦雯1, 何东升2, 娄林均1, 王仁定1, 陈江华1,()   
  1. 1. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院肾脏病中心
    2. 310022 杭州,浙江省医疗健康集团杭州医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-09 出版日期:2018-02-25
  • 通信作者: 陈江华

The effect of warm ischemic related factors on the function of renal allograft after donation after cardiac death renal transplantation

Jinwen Lin1, Dongsheng He2, Linjun Lou1, Rending Wang1, Jianghua Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Kidney disease center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
    2. Intensive Care Unit, Hangzhou hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Medical and Health Group, Hangzhou 310022, China
  • Received:2017-11-09 Published:2018-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Jianghua Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Jianghua, Email:
引用本文:

林锦雯, 何东升, 娄林均, 王仁定, 陈江华. 心脏死亡器官捐献供肾热缺血因素对移植肾功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 14-19.

Jinwen Lin, Dongsheng He, Linjun Lou, Rending Wang, Jianghua Chen. The effect of warm ischemic related factors on the function of renal allograft after donation after cardiac death renal transplantation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(01): 14-19.

目的

结合心脏死亡器官捐献(DCD)肾移植受者术后随访情况,探讨供肾热缺血因素对移植肾功能的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2011年5月至2015年6月浙江大学医学院附属第一医院肾脏病中心施行的肾移植术供、受者临床资料。移植术后1年根据受者估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)≥60 mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1和<60 mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1将受者分为高肾功能组与低肾功能组,最终纳入340例受者,其中高肾功能组259例,低肾功能组81例。根据DCD供者手术记录表,整理分析两组供者不同收缩压(SBP)及血氧饱和度(SpO2)热缺血时间段。符合正态分布计量资料以均数±标准差(±s)表示,采用t检验比较高、低肾功能组供、受者一般资料、供者不同SBP和SpO2热缺血时间段差异;采用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验比较两组受者供肾获取时肾小球和肾小管病理评分。计数资料以百分数表示,采用卡方检验比较两组供、受者性别和移植肾功能延迟恢复(DGF)发生率。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

截至2016年6月,所有受者随访(28.4±2.8)个月(13.1~62.5个月)。术后1年内高、低肾功能组DGF发生率分别为14.7%(38/259)、22.2%(18/81),差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.557,P>0.05)。高肾功能组平均年龄和BMI均低于低肾功能组,男性比例和捐献时eGFR高于低肾功能组,差异均有统计学意义(t=-6.363、-2.049、4.190, χ2=4.863,P均<0.05);高肾功能组供肾获取时肾小球病理评分低于低肾功能组,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.606,P<0.05)。高肾功能组受者年龄小于低肾功能组,而男性比例高于低肾功能组,差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.790, χ2=9.658,P均<0.05)。高、低肾功能组初始SpO2降低40%、撤除生命支持至SpO2测不出以及90%、80%、70%、60%初始SpO2至SpO2测不出的平均时间分别为(5.9±4.3)和(4.8±3.3)、(8.0±5.2)和(6.1±4.4)、(4.5±3.6)和(3.5±2.8)、(4.0±3.7)和(2.9±2.4)、(4.0±3.6)和(2.8±2.7)、(3.6±3.5)和(2.4±2.5) min,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.088、2.983、2.328、2.622、2.557、2.759,P均<0.05)。高、低肾功能组初始SpO2降低10%、40%、撤除生命支持至SpO2测不出、60%初始SpO2至SpO2测不出平均变化速率分别为(2.40±1.78)和(2.90±1.70)、(8.71±6.96)和(15.01±12.97)、(19.60±17.49)和(25.80±22.85)、(22.41±15.94)和(29.93±19.36) %/min,差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.230、-5.647、-2.577、-3.514,P均<0.05)。

结论

DCD肾移植预后受供、受者年龄、BMI等一般因素影响。供者高、低SpO2时间段长短及变化速率与移植肾功能相关,DCD供肾移植过程中可通过优化手术流程等方法缩短低SpO2时期时间,以减少供肾热缺血损伤,改善受者预后。

Objective

The effect of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury on the function of renal allograft was investigated after donation after cardiac death (DCD) renal transplantion.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of renal transplant donors and recipients at the Kidney Disease Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University from May 2011 to June 2015. One year after transplantation, the recipients were classified into high renal function group [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ] ≥60 mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1) and low renal function group (eGFR <60 mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1. According to the DCD donor surgery record, the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) of the donors during different periods of warm ischemia in two groups were analyzed. The normal distribution measurement data were showed as the mean±standard deviation (±s), and the t-test was used to compare the basic characteristic data, donor SBP and SpO2 in the different warm ischemia periods between the two groups, except for gender. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used to compare the pathological scores of glomerular and glomerular of donor kidneys between two groups when organ procurement. Count data were expressed as a percentage. Chi-square test was used to compare the donor gender and DGF incidence in the two groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

By June 2016, all patients were followed up (28.4±2.8) months, ranged from 13.1 to 62.5 months. 340 recipients were eventually included, including 259 recipients in the high renal function group and 81 recipients in the low renal function group. The incidence of DGF was 14.7% (38/259) and 22.2% (18/81) in high and low renal function groups within 1 year after transplantation, with no significant difference (χ2=2.557, P>0.05). The average age and BMI of donors in the high renal function group were lower than those in the low renal function group, and the percentage of males and eGFR at the time of donation was higher than that in the low renal function group (t=-6.363, -2.049, 4.190, χ2=4.863, P all <0.05). The renal pathology scores of donors with high renal function were lower than those with low renal function, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-2.606, P<0.05). The recipients of the high renal function group were younger than the low renal function group, and the proportion of males was higher than the low renal function group, with significant difference (t=-2.790, χ2=9.658, P<0.05). In the high and low renal function groups, the initial SpO2 decreased by 40%, the average time from life support device withdrawal, different initial SpO2 with 90%, 80%, 70%, 60% of to SpO2 to SpO2 could not be measured, were (5.9±4.3) and (4.8±3.3), (8.0±5.2) and (6.1±4.4), (4.5±3.6) and (3.5±2.8), (4.0±3.7) and (2.9±2.4), (4.0±3.6) and (2.8±2.7), (3.6±3.5) and (2.4±2.5) minutes, with significant difference (t=2.088, 2.983, 2.328, 2.622, 2.557, 2.759, all P<0.05). In the high and low renal function groups, the average change rate of initial SpO2 declined by 10%, 40%, life support device withdrawal to SpO2 not detected, initial 60% SpO2 to SpO2 not detected were (2.40±1.78) and (2.90±1.70), (8.71±6.96) and (15.01±12.97), (19.60±17.49) and (25.80±22.85), (22.41±15.94) and (29.93±19.36) percentage per minute, with significant difference (t=-2.230, -5.647, -2.577, -3.514, P all <0.05).

Conclusions

The prognosis of DCD renal transplantation was influenced by the general factors such as donor and recipient age and BMI. The high and low renal function recipients had different high and low SpO2 time intervals and different rates of change derived from the DCD donors. During DCD renal transplantation, optimized surgical procedures should be taken to minimize the low SpO2 duration, so that the warm ischemia damage of the donor would be alleviated to acheive a better prognosis of tranplant.

表1 高、低肾功能组供者基本资料比较
表2 高、低肾功能组受者基本资料比较
表3 高、低肾功能组供者不同SBP热缺血时间段比较(±s,min)
表4 高、低肾功能组供者不同SpO2热缺血时间段比较(±s,min)
表5 高、低肾功能组供者不同SpO2热缺血时间段变化速率比较(±s,%/min)
1
杜然然,高东平,李扬,等. 肾移植发展现状研究[J]. 医学研究杂志,2011, 40(11):168-172.
2
黄洁夫,李焯辉,郭志勇,等. 中国器官捐献的发展历程[J/CD]. 中华重症医学电子杂志,2017, 3(2):81-84.
3
胡志平,冷希圣,黄磊,等. 心脏死亡供肝肝移植的疗效观察[J]. 中华普通外科杂志,2016, 31(3):221-223.
4
Nishikido M, Noguchi M, Koga S, et al. Kidney transplantation from non-heart-beating donors: analysis of organ procurement and outcome[J]. Transplant Proc, 2004, 36(7):1888-1890.
5
Summers DM, Johnson RJ, Allen J, et al. Analysis of factors that affect outcome after transplantation of kidneys donated after cardiac death in the UK: a cohort study[J]. Lancet, 2010, 376(9749):1303-1311.
6
Wang J, Xie P, Huang JM, et al. The new Asian modified CKD-EPI equation leads to more accurate GFR estimation in Chinese patients with CKD[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2016, 48(12):2077-2081.
7
Remuzzi G, Grinyò J, Ruggenenti P, et al. Early experience with dual kidney transplantation in adults using expanded donor criteria. Double Kidney Transplant Group (DKG)[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 1999, 10(12):2591-2598.
8
刘荣耀,王东文. 肾移植:过去、现在、未来[J]. 国际移植与血液净化杂志,2008, 6(1):15-17.
9
Ledinh H, Bonvoisin C, Weekers L, et al. Results of kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death[J]. Transplant Proc, 2010, 42(7):2407-2414.
10
Knoll G. Trends in kidney transplantation over the past decade[J]. Drugs, 2008, 68(Suppl 1):S3-S10.
11
Veroux M, Corona D, Veroux P. Kidney transplantation: future challenges[J]. Minerva Chir, 2009, 64(1):75-100.
12
Doshi MD, Hunsicker LG. Short-and long-term outcomes with the use of kidneys and livers donated after cardiac death[J]. Am J Transplant, 2007, 7(1):122-129.
13
Yin M, Currin RT, Peng XX. et al. Different patterns of renal cell killing after warm and cold ischemia[J]. Ren Fail, 2002, 24(2):147-163
14
Ysebaert DK, De Greef KE, Vercauteren SR, et al. Effect of immunosuppression on damage, leukocyte infiltration, and regeneration after severe warm ischemia/reperfusion renal injury[J]. Kidney Int, 2003, 64(3):864-873.
15
Damasceno-Ferreira JA, Abreu LAS, Bechara GR, et al. Mannitol reduces nephron loss after warm renal ischemia in a porcine model[J]. BMC Urol, 2018,18(1):16.
16
Ahmad N, Pratt JR, Potts DJ, et al. Comparative efficacy of renal preservation solutions to limit functional impairment after warm ischemic injury[J]. Kidney Int, 2006, 69(5):884-893.
17
Coffey JC, Wanis KN, Monbaliu D, et al. The influence of functional warm ischemia time on DCD liver transplant recipients′ outcomes[J]. Clin Transplant, 2017, 31(10):e13068.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[3] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[4] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[5] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[6] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[7] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[8] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[9] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[10] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[11] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[12] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[13] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?