切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 28 -33. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2018.01.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同大鼠心脏死亡器官捐献模型肝脏损伤比较研究
伍亚红1, 周雪莲2, 黄明珠1, 贾俊君3, 李建辉3, 姜骊3, 李浩宇3, 郑树森3,()   
  1. 1. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院中心实验室
    2. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属儿童医院内分泌科
    3. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院卫生部多器官联合移植研究重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-01 出版日期:2018-02-25
  • 通信作者: 郑树森
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金创新研究群体(81721091); 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81470891); 中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2017M610374)

A comparative study on the damage against liver in different donation after cardiac death rat models

Yahong Wu1, Xuelian Zhou2, Mingzhu Huang1, Junjun Jia3, Jianhui Li3, Li Jiang3, Haoyu Li3, Shushen Zheng3,()   

  1. 1. Central Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
    2. Department of endocrinology, the Children′s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
    3. Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Health, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
  • Received:2018-02-01 Published:2018-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Shushen Zheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zheng Shushen, Email:
引用本文:

伍亚红, 周雪莲, 黄明珠, 贾俊君, 李建辉, 姜骊, 李浩宇, 郑树森. 不同大鼠心脏死亡器官捐献模型肝脏损伤比较研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(01): 28-33.

Yahong Wu, Xuelian Zhou, Mingzhu Huang, Junjun Jia, Jianhui Li, Li Jiang, Haoyu Li, Shushen Zheng. A comparative study on the damage against liver in different donation after cardiac death rat models[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(01): 28-33.

目的

探讨不同大鼠心脏死亡器官捐献模型供肝损伤机制。

方法

将15只SD大鼠按随机数字表法分为氯化钾注射组、膈肌剪断组、心尖夹闭组,每组5只。氯化钾注射组通过背部浅表层静脉注射10%氯化钾溶液诱导心脏停跳;膈肌剪断组将膈肌剪断导致大鼠低血压和缺氧,诱导心脏停跳;心尖夹闭组开腹后用血管夹夹住左、右心室顶端,诱导心脏停跳。记录各组大鼠心脏停跳时间。3组大鼠心脏停跳后立即下腔静脉采血,检测血清ALT、AST、葡萄糖、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)含量。取各组大鼠肝脏组织行HE染色,光镜下观察肝脏组织病理学变化。检测各组大鼠肝脏组织中过氧化氢、一氧化氮含量。实时荧光定量PCR法检测大鼠肝脏组织B细胞淋巴瘤/白血病-2相关X蛋白(Bax)、B细胞淋巴瘤/白血病-2(Bcl-2)、半胱氨酸天冬氨酸特异性蛋白酶-3(Capase-3)转录情况。蛋白质印迹法检测大鼠肝脏组织磷酸化Akt(p-Akt)、Bax和Bcl-2蛋白表达情况。各组大鼠建模后心脏停跳时间、血清肝功能指标、肝脏组织一氧化氮和过氧化氢含量、凋亡相关分子(Bax、Bcl-2、Capase-3)转录水平及相关蛋白表达量比较均采用单因素方差分析。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

膈肌剪断组和心尖夹闭组建模后心脏停跳时间分别为(720±137)、(1 020±142)s,均长于氯化钾注射组[(111±10)s,P均<0.05];氯化钾注射组和膈肌剪断组血清ALT分别为(29±14)、(49±11)U/L,均低于心尖夹闭组[(71±13)U/L,P均<0.05];心尖夹闭组血清AST、葡萄糖和LDH分别为(293±61)、(26.7±6.6)和(2 534±907)U/L,均高于氯化钾注射组[(131±67)、(15.8±8.5)、(1 528±1 170)U/L,P均<0.05]。HE染色结果显示心尖夹闭组和膈肌剪断组较氯化钾注射组有严重的充血和红细胞渗入,而心尖夹闭组与膈肌剪断组差异不明显。氯化钾注射组和膈肌剪断组肝脏组织过氧化氢含量分别为(13.8±3.7)、(13.7±1.8)mmol/L,均低于心尖夹闭组[(19.1±4.1)mmol/L,P均<0.05];心尖夹闭组一氧化氮含量为(13.3±3.2)mmol/L,高于膈肌剪断组[(6.9±0.4)mmol/L,P<0.05]。氯化钾注射组Bax转录量低于膈肌剪断组,心尖夹闭组Bax表达量高于氯化钾注射组,氯化钾注射组P-Akt 473和P-Akt 308表达量显著高于心尖夹闭组(P均<0.05)。

结论

氯化钾注射组对肝脏损伤影响最小,可能与细胞凋亡减少、P-akt相关信号通路激活有关。

Objective

To investigate the damage against liver in different donation after cardiac death rat models and explore the underlying mechanisms.

Methods

Fifteen rats were equally divided into three groups: potassium chloride injection (PCI), diaphragmatic cutting (DC), apical clipping (AC) group. The PCL group was induced by intravenous injection of 10% potassium chloride solution to cardiac arrest through superficial dorsal vein of the penis. The DC group was made by clipping diaphragm to induce hypotension and hypoxia, and finally cardiac arrest. The AC group was made by clamping top of left and right ventricle of the heart with vascular clamp until cardiac arrest. The time of cardiac arrest was recorded. Serum was collected through postcava after cardiac death to evaluate liver function. Liver samples were collected and HE staining was performed. The level of nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were determined.The mRNA level of Bax, Bcl-2 and Caspase-3 were detected by RT-PCR and the protein level of p-Akt, Bax and Bcl-2 were detected by western blot. One-way ANOVA was used for comparing the time of cardiac arrest、liver function indexes、NO and H2O2 content in liver tissue、transcription levels of apoptosis-related molecules (Bax, Bcl-2, Capase-3) and related protein expressions between different groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The time of cardiac arrest of DC and AC group were (720±137), (1 020±142) s respectively, longer than that in PCI group [(111±10) s, P all<0.05]. The serum levels of ALT in the PCI and DC group were (29±14)、(49±11) U/L, respectively, lower than that in AC group [(71±13) U/L, P all<0.05]. The serum levels of AST、glucose and lactate dehydrogenase in the AC group were (293±61), (26.7±6.6), (2 534±907) U/L, respectively, higher than those in PCI group [(131±67), (15.8±8.5), (1 528±1 170) U/L, P all<0.05]. The result of HE staining showed that the AC and DC groups suffered more serious congestion and red blood cell infiltration than that in PCI group, while there were no significant differences between the AC and DC group. The contents of H2O2 of PCI and DC group were (13.8±3.7), (13.7±1.8) mmol/L, lower than that in AC group [(19.1±4.1) mmol/L, P all <0.05]. The NO content in the AC group was (13.3±3.2) mmol/L, higher than that in DC group [(6.9±0.4) mmol/L, P all <0.05]. The mRNA level of Bax was found higher in DC group than that in PCL group. The expression of Bax in AC group was higher than that in the PCL group. There were marked increase of P-Akt 473 and P-Akt 308 expression in PCL group than AC group (P all<0.05).

Conclusion

The PCL group was considered the less damage to liver and its mechanism was probably associated with the cell apoptosis reduction and P-Akt pathway activation.

表1 3组大鼠心脏停跳时间和肝功能检测结果(±s)
图1 3组大鼠心脏停跳后肝脏组织病理学检查结果(HE ×100)
表2 3组大鼠心脏停跳后肝脏组织细胞过氧化氢、一氧化氮含量(±s,mmol/L)
图2 3组大鼠心脏停跳后肝脏组织细胞Bax、Caspase-3、Bcl-2转录水平
图3 3组大鼠肝脏组织凋亡相关蛋白电泳条带及其相对表达量
1
Ortega-Deballon I, Hornby L, Shemie SD. Protocols for uncontrolled donation after circulatory death: a systematic review of international guidelines, practices and transplant outcomes[J]. Crit Care, 2015, 19(1):268-293.
2
Dubbeld J, Hoekstra H, Farid W, et al. Similar liver transplantation survival with selected cardiac death donors and brain death donors[J]. Br J Surg, 2010, 97(5):744-753.
3
Sutherland Al, Ijzermans JN, Forsythe JL, et al. Kidney and liver transplantation in the elderly[J]. Br J Serg, 2016, 103(2):e62-e72.
4
Nosaka N, okada A, Tsukahara H. Effects of therapeutic hypothermia for neuroprotection from the viewpoint of redox regulation[J]. Acta Med Okayma, 2017, 71(1):1-9.
5
Foley DP, Fernandez LA, Leverson G, et al. Biliary complications after liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: an analysis of risk factors and long-term outcomes from a single center[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 253(4):817-825.
6
Perera MT, Bramhall SR. Current status and recent advances of liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death[J]. World J Gastrointest Surg, 2011, 3(11):167-176.
7
刘永峰. 心脏死亡供者器官移植现状及展望[J]. 中华普通外科杂志,2013, 28(3):169-172.
8
Mahboub P, Bozorgzadeh A, Martins PN. Potential approaches to improve the outcomes of donation after cardiac death liver grafts[J].World J Transplant, 2016, 6(2):314-320.
9
Detry O, Le Dinh H, Noterdaemer T, et al. Categories of donation after cardiocirculatory death[J]. Transplant Proc, 2012, 44(5):1189-1195.
10
刘永峰,裘正军,江技,等. Akt和磷酸化Akt在胰腺癌组织中的表达及意义[J]. 中华胰腺病杂志,2010, 10(2):128-130.
[1] 刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[2] 严华悦, 刘子祥, 周少波. 磷酸烯醇式丙酮酸羧激酶-1在恶性肿瘤中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 452-456.
[3] 胡思平, 熊性宇, 徐航, 杨璐. 衰老相关分泌表型因子在前列腺癌发生发展中的作用机制[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 425-434.
[4] 郑俊, 吴杰英, 谭海波, 郑安全, 李腾成. EGFR-MEK-TZ三联合分子的构建及其对去势抵抗性前列腺癌细胞增殖与凋亡的影响[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 503-508.
[5] 刘璐璐, 何羽. 慢性阻塞性肺病患者睡眠障碍的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 836-839.
[6] 袁园园, 岳乐淇, 张华兴, 武艳, 李全海. 间充质干细胞在呼吸系统疾病模型中肺组织分布及治疗机制的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 374-381.
[7] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[8] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[9] 傅斌生, 冯啸, 杨卿, 曾凯宁, 姚嘉, 唐晖, 刘剑戎, 魏绪霞, 易慧敏, 易述红, 陈规划, 杨扬. 脂肪变性供肝在成人劈离式肝移植中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 789-794.
[10] 伍细蓉, 徐立文, 陈亚琼. 基于LPR和FARI构建肝衰竭患者生存预后模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 675-681.
[11] 赵泽云, 李建男, 王旻. 中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网在结直肠癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 524-528.
[12] 王国强, 张纲, 唐建坡, 张玉国, 杨永江. LINC00839 调节miR-17-5p/WEE1 轴对结直肠癌细胞增殖、凋亡和迁移的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 491-499.
[13] 陈利, 杨长青, 朱风尚. 重视炎症性肠病和代谢相关脂肪性肝病间的串话机制研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 385-389.
[14] 刘琦, 王守凯, 王帅, 苏雨晴, 马壮, 陈海军, 司丕蕾. 乳腺癌肿瘤内微生物组的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 841-845.
[15] 徐靖亭, 孔璐. PARP抑制剂治疗卵巢癌的耐药机制及应对策略[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 584-588.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?