切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 285 -289. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2020.05.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

超声检查在胰肾联合移植术后监测中的应用价值初探
杨子祯1, 王新1, 吴晓冬1, 李志强1, 臧运金1, 王建红1,()   
  1. 1. 266100 青岛大学附属医院器官移植中心
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-08 出版日期:2020-10-20
  • 通信作者: 王建红
  • 基金资助:
    山东省重点研发计划(2019GSF108266)

Application value of ultrasonography on postoperative monitoring of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

Zizhen Yang1, Xin Wang1, Xiaodong Wu1, Zhiqiang Li1, Yunjin Zang1, Jianhong Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Organ Transplantation Center, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266100, China
  • Received:2020-04-08 Published:2020-10-20
  • Corresponding author: Jianhong Wang
引用本文:

杨子祯, 王新, 吴晓冬, 李志强, 臧运金, 王建红. 超声检查在胰肾联合移植术后监测中的应用价值初探[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 285-289.

Zizhen Yang, Xin Wang, Xiaodong Wu, Zhiqiang Li, Yunjin Zang, Jianhong Wang. Application value of ultrasonography on postoperative monitoring of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 285-289.

目的

初步探讨超声检查在胰肾联合移植(SPK)术后监测中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析青岛大学附属医院2019年8月至11月完成的5例行SPK供、受者超声检查资料。5例供者术前行常规二维超声检查,评估肾脏和胰腺大小、内部回声。供器官获取后依次行肾移植和胰腺移植。术后1周内每天行超声检查1次,1周后每3天1次,1个月后每2个月1次,或根据病情需求行超声检查。采用重复测量资料方差分析比较SPK移植前、移植后第1、7天和第1个月移植胰腺和肾脏大小以及移植后第1、3、7天及第1个月移植胰腺及肾脏内动脉收缩期最大流速(PSV)、阻力指数(RI),进一步两两比较采用LSD法。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

常规二维超声显示术后1周内移植胰腺形态饱满,实质回声偏低、均质,胰管无扩张;移植肾形态饱满,皮质回声均匀,皮髓质分界清晰,集合系统无分离。5例SPK受者术后第1天移植胰腺胰头、胰体和胰尾以及肾脏长径、前后径和左右径均大于移植前,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);术后第1个月移植胰腺胰头、胰体和胰尾以及肾脏长径均小于术后第1天,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。移植术后1周内彩色多普勒血流显像检查示胰腺内动、静脉血流显示较好,胰腺内动脉PSV为16.6~37.2 cm/s,RI为0.52~0.70。5例移植胰腺中4例门-腔静脉血流显示良好,频谱呈双相波或三相波等体静脉频谱特征。1例术后门-腔静脉吻合口显示欠清,超声造影检查示动脉期移植胰腺肠系膜上动脉、脾动脉及实质内小动脉分支顺次清晰显影,静脉期门-腔静脉、脾静脉显影,实质内未见异常灌注区。5例移植肾脏三级血流显示清晰,肾动脉PSV为24.2~123.0 cm/s,RI为0.55~0.81。5例受者术后第1、3、7天和第1个月移植胰腺内胰头动脉和胰体尾动脉以及移植肾内肾叶间动脉、肾段动脉和肾门动脉PSV、RI差异均无统计学差异(F=0.182、0.953、1.321、1.867、2.121和1.588、0.544、3.902、2.752、0.956,P均>0.05)。1例维吾尔族男性受者术后第22天怀疑发生急性排斥反应,予甲泼尼龙冲击治疗后恢复正常。截至2020年2月,5例受者术后均恢复良好,移植肾脏与胰腺功能良好,肾功能及血糖水平均恢复正常。

结论

超声可以作为SPK术后动态监测的首选影像学检查方法,了解移植物大小、体积、内部回声和血流动力学等情况,对早期发现术后并发症有重要价值。

Objective

To preliminarily analyze the application value of ultrasonography on postoperative monitoring of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK).

Methods

The ultrasonographic data of 5 cases undergoing SPK in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from August 2019 to November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Five donors underwent conventional two-dimensional ultrasound examination before transplantation to assess the size and internal echo of the kidney and pancreas. Kidney transplantation and pancreas transplantation were performed in turn. Ultrasound examination was performed once a day within 1 week after transplantation, once every 3 days after 1 week, and once every 2 months after 1 month, or according to the condition. The peak systolic velocity (PSV) and resistance index (RI) of the transplanted pancreas and kidney before and after transplantation and at the 1st, 3rd, 7th and 1st month after transplantation were compared using the repeated measure of ANOVA, Least-Significance Difference was used for pairwise comparison. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Conventional two-dimensional ultrasound showed that within 1 week after the operation, the transplanted pancreas was plump, with low parenchymal echo, homogeneous and no dilatation of the pancreatic duct; and the transplanted kidney is plump in shape, with uniform cortical echo, clear boundary of cortex and medulla, and no separation of collection system. The anteroposterior diameter of transplant pancreas head, body, tail, and the long diameter, anteroposterior diameter and left and right diameter of transplant kidney were all longer than before the transplantation (all P<0.05). The anteroposterior diameter of transplant pancreas head, body, tail and the length of transplant kidney 1 month after transplantation were all smaller than that of the first day (all P<0.05). Color doppler flow imaging (CDFI) showed that the vascular display of all branches in pancreas was good in 5 cases within 1 week after transplantation, the PSV of the internal pancreatic artery is 16.6-37.2 cm/s, and the RI is 0.52-0.70, the portal-vena cava in 4 cases showed well and the frequency spectrum was characterized by two-way or three-way wave. The postoperative portal-vena cava anastomosis showed poor clarity in 1 case, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was performed: the blood flow of superior mesenteric artery, splenic artery, arteriloes of transplant pancreas showed well in the arterial-phase, and portal-vena cava and splenic vein were shown in the venous-phase. No perfusion disorders was found in pancreatic parenchyma. Five cases of transplanted kidney showed clear three-level blood flow, the PSV of the renal artery was 24.2-123.0 cm/s, RI was 0.55-0.81. There were no statistically significant differences in PSV and RI between the head and tail arteries of transplant pancreas, interlobar, segmental and hilar arteries of transplant kidney of the 5 recipients at the 1st, 3rd, 7th and 1st month after transplantation (F=2.823 and 0.881, all P>0.05). One Uyghur male recipient was suspected of acute rejection on the 22nd day after transplantation, and returned to normal after being treated with methylprednisolone. Up to February 2020, all 5 recipients have recovered well after the transplantation, the transplanted kidney and pancreas function well, and the renal function and blood glucose levels have returned to normal.

Conclusions

Ultrasonography can serve as the preferred imaging examination for dynamic monitoring after SPK. It can help to evaluate the size, volume internal echo and the blood flow of the grafts. This is of great value for early detection of postoperative complications.

表1 胰肾联合移植前后移植胰腺及肾脏大小比较(±s,mm)
表2 胰肾联合移植术后1个月内移植胰腺及肾脏内动脉收缩期最大流速比较(±s,cm/s)
表3 胰肾联合移植术后1个月内移植胰腺及肾脏内动脉阻力指数比较(±s)
1
American Diabetes Association. Pancreas transplantation for patients with type 1 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Care, 2000, 23(1): 117.
2
Bijkerk R, van der Pol P, Khairoun M, et al. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes reverses elevated MBL levels in association with MBL2 genotype and VEGF expression[J]. Diabetologia, 2016, 59(4): 853-858.
3
胡安,朱晓峰,王东平,等. 胰腺联合移植治疗糖尿病合并终末期肾病(附7例报告)[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献:电子版,2009, 3(3): 216-219.
4
Shapiro R, Jordan ML, Scantlebury VP, et al. Renal allograft rejection with normal renal function in simultaneous kidney/pancreas recipients: does dissynchronous rejection really exist?[J]. Transplantation, 2000, 69(3): 440-441.
5
宋文利,郑建明,赵杰,等. 利用供者髂动脉搭桥的腔静脉回流式胰肾联合移植术[J/CD]. 实用器官移植电子杂志,2014, 2(6): 350-355.
6
Nikolaidis P, Amin RS, Hwang CM, et al. Role of sonography in pancreatic transplantation[J]. Radiographics, 2003, 23(4): 939-949.
7
周元媛,黄道中,明长生,等. 彩色多普勒超声在胰肾联合移植术后的应用价值[J]. 中华器官移植杂志,2005, 26(10): 587-589.
8
Foshager MC, Hedlund LJ, Troppmann C, et al. Venous thrombosis of pancreatic transplants: diagnosis by duplex sonography[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1997, 169(5): 1269-1273.
9
Chung DY, Anderson EM. Evaluation of a single-pass with biphasic intravenous contrast medium injection CT protocol for the assessment of complications post-simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant[J]. Clin Radiol, 2018, 73(7): 677.e7-677.e11.
10
Sporea I, Badea R, Martie A, et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of focal liver lesions in daily practice. a multicentre study[J]. Med Ultrason, 2012, 14(2): 95-100.
11
Wong JJ, Krebs TL, Klassen DK, et al. Sonographic evaluation of acute pancreatic transplant rejection: morphology-doppler analysis versus guided percutaneous biopsy[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1996, 166(4): 803-807.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[5] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[6] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[7] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[8] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[9] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[10] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[11] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[12] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[13] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[14] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[15] 石阳, 于剑锋, 曹可, 翟志伟, 叶春祥, 王振军, 韩加刚. 可扩张金属支架置入联合新辅助化疗治疗完全梗阻性左半结肠癌围手术期并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 464-471.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?