切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 285 -289. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2020.05.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

超声检查在胰肾联合移植术后监测中的应用价值初探
杨子祯1, 王新1, 吴晓冬1, 李志强1, 臧运金1, 王建红1,()   
  1. 1. 266100 青岛大学附属医院器官移植中心
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-08 出版日期:2020-10-20
  • 通信作者: 王建红
  • 基金资助:
    山东省重点研发计划(2019GSF108266)

Application value of ultrasonography on postoperative monitoring of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

Zizhen Yang1, Xin Wang1, Xiaodong Wu1, Zhiqiang Li1, Yunjin Zang1, Jianhong Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Organ Transplantation Center, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266100, China
  • Received:2020-04-08 Published:2020-10-20
  • Corresponding author: Jianhong Wang
引用本文:

杨子祯, 王新, 吴晓冬, 李志强, 臧运金, 王建红. 超声检查在胰肾联合移植术后监测中的应用价值初探[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 285-289.

Zizhen Yang, Xin Wang, Xiaodong Wu, Zhiqiang Li, Yunjin Zang, Jianhong Wang. Application value of ultrasonography on postoperative monitoring of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 285-289.

目的

初步探讨超声检查在胰肾联合移植(SPK)术后监测中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析青岛大学附属医院2019年8月至11月完成的5例行SPK供、受者超声检查资料。5例供者术前行常规二维超声检查,评估肾脏和胰腺大小、内部回声。供器官获取后依次行肾移植和胰腺移植。术后1周内每天行超声检查1次,1周后每3天1次,1个月后每2个月1次,或根据病情需求行超声检查。采用重复测量资料方差分析比较SPK移植前、移植后第1、7天和第1个月移植胰腺和肾脏大小以及移植后第1、3、7天及第1个月移植胰腺及肾脏内动脉收缩期最大流速(PSV)、阻力指数(RI),进一步两两比较采用LSD法。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

常规二维超声显示术后1周内移植胰腺形态饱满,实质回声偏低、均质,胰管无扩张;移植肾形态饱满,皮质回声均匀,皮髓质分界清晰,集合系统无分离。5例SPK受者术后第1天移植胰腺胰头、胰体和胰尾以及肾脏长径、前后径和左右径均大于移植前,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);术后第1个月移植胰腺胰头、胰体和胰尾以及肾脏长径均小于术后第1天,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。移植术后1周内彩色多普勒血流显像检查示胰腺内动、静脉血流显示较好,胰腺内动脉PSV为16.6~37.2 cm/s,RI为0.52~0.70。5例移植胰腺中4例门-腔静脉血流显示良好,频谱呈双相波或三相波等体静脉频谱特征。1例术后门-腔静脉吻合口显示欠清,超声造影检查示动脉期移植胰腺肠系膜上动脉、脾动脉及实质内小动脉分支顺次清晰显影,静脉期门-腔静脉、脾静脉显影,实质内未见异常灌注区。5例移植肾脏三级血流显示清晰,肾动脉PSV为24.2~123.0 cm/s,RI为0.55~0.81。5例受者术后第1、3、7天和第1个月移植胰腺内胰头动脉和胰体尾动脉以及移植肾内肾叶间动脉、肾段动脉和肾门动脉PSV、RI差异均无统计学差异(F=0.182、0.953、1.321、1.867、2.121和1.588、0.544、3.902、2.752、0.956,P均>0.05)。1例维吾尔族男性受者术后第22天怀疑发生急性排斥反应,予甲泼尼龙冲击治疗后恢复正常。截至2020年2月,5例受者术后均恢复良好,移植肾脏与胰腺功能良好,肾功能及血糖水平均恢复正常。

结论

超声可以作为SPK术后动态监测的首选影像学检查方法,了解移植物大小、体积、内部回声和血流动力学等情况,对早期发现术后并发症有重要价值。

Objective

To preliminarily analyze the application value of ultrasonography on postoperative monitoring of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK).

Methods

The ultrasonographic data of 5 cases undergoing SPK in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from August 2019 to November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Five donors underwent conventional two-dimensional ultrasound examination before transplantation to assess the size and internal echo of the kidney and pancreas. Kidney transplantation and pancreas transplantation were performed in turn. Ultrasound examination was performed once a day within 1 week after transplantation, once every 3 days after 1 week, and once every 2 months after 1 month, or according to the condition. The peak systolic velocity (PSV) and resistance index (RI) of the transplanted pancreas and kidney before and after transplantation and at the 1st, 3rd, 7th and 1st month after transplantation were compared using the repeated measure of ANOVA, Least-Significance Difference was used for pairwise comparison. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Conventional two-dimensional ultrasound showed that within 1 week after the operation, the transplanted pancreas was plump, with low parenchymal echo, homogeneous and no dilatation of the pancreatic duct; and the transplanted kidney is plump in shape, with uniform cortical echo, clear boundary of cortex and medulla, and no separation of collection system. The anteroposterior diameter of transplant pancreas head, body, tail, and the long diameter, anteroposterior diameter and left and right diameter of transplant kidney were all longer than before the transplantation (all P<0.05). The anteroposterior diameter of transplant pancreas head, body, tail and the length of transplant kidney 1 month after transplantation were all smaller than that of the first day (all P<0.05). Color doppler flow imaging (CDFI) showed that the vascular display of all branches in pancreas was good in 5 cases within 1 week after transplantation, the PSV of the internal pancreatic artery is 16.6-37.2 cm/s, and the RI is 0.52-0.70, the portal-vena cava in 4 cases showed well and the frequency spectrum was characterized by two-way or three-way wave. The postoperative portal-vena cava anastomosis showed poor clarity in 1 case, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was performed: the blood flow of superior mesenteric artery, splenic artery, arteriloes of transplant pancreas showed well in the arterial-phase, and portal-vena cava and splenic vein were shown in the venous-phase. No perfusion disorders was found in pancreatic parenchyma. Five cases of transplanted kidney showed clear three-level blood flow, the PSV of the renal artery was 24.2-123.0 cm/s, RI was 0.55-0.81. There were no statistically significant differences in PSV and RI between the head and tail arteries of transplant pancreas, interlobar, segmental and hilar arteries of transplant kidney of the 5 recipients at the 1st, 3rd, 7th and 1st month after transplantation (F=2.823 and 0.881, all P>0.05). One Uyghur male recipient was suspected of acute rejection on the 22nd day after transplantation, and returned to normal after being treated with methylprednisolone. Up to February 2020, all 5 recipients have recovered well after the transplantation, the transplanted kidney and pancreas function well, and the renal function and blood glucose levels have returned to normal.

Conclusions

Ultrasonography can serve as the preferred imaging examination for dynamic monitoring after SPK. It can help to evaluate the size, volume internal echo and the blood flow of the grafts. This is of great value for early detection of postoperative complications.

表1 胰肾联合移植前后移植胰腺及肾脏大小比较(±s,mm)
表2 胰肾联合移植术后1个月内移植胰腺及肾脏内动脉收缩期最大流速比较(±s,cm/s)
表3 胰肾联合移植术后1个月内移植胰腺及肾脏内动脉阻力指数比较(±s)
1
American Diabetes Association. Pancreas transplantation for patients with type 1 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Care, 2000, 23(1): 117.
2
Bijkerk R, van der Pol P, Khairoun M, et al. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes reverses elevated MBL levels in association with MBL2 genotype and VEGF expression[J]. Diabetologia, 2016, 59(4): 853-858.
3
胡安,朱晓峰,王东平,等. 胰腺联合移植治疗糖尿病合并终末期肾病(附7例报告)[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献:电子版,2009, 3(3): 216-219.
4
Shapiro R, Jordan ML, Scantlebury VP, et al. Renal allograft rejection with normal renal function in simultaneous kidney/pancreas recipients: does dissynchronous rejection really exist?[J]. Transplantation, 2000, 69(3): 440-441.
5
宋文利,郑建明,赵杰,等. 利用供者髂动脉搭桥的腔静脉回流式胰肾联合移植术[J/CD]. 实用器官移植电子杂志,2014, 2(6): 350-355.
6
Nikolaidis P, Amin RS, Hwang CM, et al. Role of sonography in pancreatic transplantation[J]. Radiographics, 2003, 23(4): 939-949.
7
周元媛,黄道中,明长生,等. 彩色多普勒超声在胰肾联合移植术后的应用价值[J]. 中华器官移植杂志,2005, 26(10): 587-589.
8
Foshager MC, Hedlund LJ, Troppmann C, et al. Venous thrombosis of pancreatic transplants: diagnosis by duplex sonography[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1997, 169(5): 1269-1273.
9
Chung DY, Anderson EM. Evaluation of a single-pass with biphasic intravenous contrast medium injection CT protocol for the assessment of complications post-simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant[J]. Clin Radiol, 2018, 73(7): 677.e7-677.e11.
10
Sporea I, Badea R, Martie A, et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of focal liver lesions in daily practice. a multicentre study[J]. Med Ultrason, 2012, 14(2): 95-100.
11
Wong JJ, Krebs TL, Klassen DK, et al. Sonographic evaluation of acute pancreatic transplant rejection: morphology-doppler analysis versus guided percutaneous biopsy[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1996, 166(4): 803-807.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[3] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[4] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[5] 陈舜, 薛恩生, 叶琴. PDCA在持续改进超声危急值管理制度中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 974-978.
[6] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[7] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[8] 马艳波, 华扬, 刘桂梅, 孟秀峰, 崔立平. 中青年人颈动脉粥样硬化病变的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 822-826.
[9] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[10] 张丽丽, 陈莉, 余美琴, 聂小艳, 王婧玲, 刘婷. PDCA循环法在超声浅表器官亚专科建设中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 717-721.
[11] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[12] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[13] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[14] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[15] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
阅读次数
全文


摘要