切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 199 -204. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2021.04.002

论著

体外膜肺氧合在肺移植围手术期的应用
夏维1, 许红阳1,(), 毛文君2, 陈静瑜2   
  1. 1. 214023 无锡,南京医科大学附属无锡市人民医院重症医学科
    2. 214023 无锡,南京医科大学附属无锡市人民医院胸外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-30 出版日期:2021-08-25
  • 通信作者: 许红阳
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省科教强卫工程青年医学重点人才项目(QNRC2016193)

Application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the perioperative period of lung transplantation

Wei Xia1, Hongyang Xu1,(), Wenjun Mao2, Jingyu Chen2   

  1. 1. Department of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Wuxi People′s Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214023, China
    2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Wuxi People′s Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214023, China
  • Received:2021-03-30 Published:2021-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Hongyang Xu
引用本文:

夏维, 许红阳, 毛文君, 陈静瑜. 体外膜肺氧合在肺移植围手术期的应用[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 199-204.

Wei Xia, Hongyang Xu, Wenjun Mao, Jingyu Chen. Application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the perioperative period of lung transplantation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(04): 199-204.

目的

分析体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)在肺移植围手术期应用的有效性。

方法

回顾性分析在无锡市人民医院肺移植中心行肺移植且围手术期应用ECMO的受者临床资料。选取2015年1月至2019年12月在本院肺移植中心行肺移植且围手术期应用ECMO的390例肺移植受者作为研究对象。根据ECMO置管方式不同将受者分为V-A组(n=244例)和V-V组(n=146例);根据受者术后ECMO支持时间是否>72 h将术后应用ECMO受者分为未延长组(≤72 h)和延长组(>72 h),并将延长组受者根据ECMO置管方式分为V-A延长组和V-V延长组。收集受者性别、年龄、原发病、手术方式(双肺或单肺)、ECMO上机时间点、ECMO置管方式(V-A或V-V)、围手术期ECMO支持时间及撤除情况等临床资料。组间符合正态分布计量资料比较采用独立样本t检验,非正态分布计量资料比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验,计数资料比较采用卡方检验或Fisher确切概率法。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制术后应用ECMO的肺移植受者90 d生存曲线,累积生存率比较采用log-rank检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

390例受者肺移植手术年份分布:2015至2019年分别为32、77、87、97和97例。V-A组和V-V组受者原发病中特发性肺动脉高压例数分别为20和0例,差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.614,P<0.05),其余一般资料差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。剔除V-A组和V-V组特发性肺动脉高压受者后,ECMO成功撤除的比例分别为211/224和137/146,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.021,P>0.05)。390例围手术期应用ECMO受者中术后应用ECMO支持274例,其中未延长组230例,延长组44例。未延长组受者术后30、60和90 d累积生存率分别为90.9%、86.5%和77.4%,均显著高于延长组(75.0%、70.5%和59.1%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.840,P<0.05)。延长组受者中V-A延长组26例,V-V延长组18例,两组受者术后30、60和90 d累积生存率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.654,P>0.05)。

结论

ECMO在肺移植受者围手术期发挥重要作用;V-V置管方式创伤小,更适合无严重心室功能障碍者,特发性肺动脉高压患者宜选择V-A置管方式;术后ECMO支持时间延长较不延长受者预后差。

Objective

To evaluate the effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the perioperative period of lung transplantation.

Methods

The clinical data of patients transplanted in the Lung Transplantation Center of Wuxi People′s Hospital with perioperative application of ECMO were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 390 lung transplant recipients receiving ECMO during the perioperative phase from January 2015 to December 2019 were selected as subjects. The 390 recipients were divided into V-A group (n=244 ) and V-V group (n=146), and the postoperative applied ECMO recipients were grouped into unextended group (≤72 h) and extended group (>72 h) based on whether the postoperative ECMO support time was >72 h, and recipients in extended group (>72 h) were divided into V-A extended group and V-V extended group. Clinical data were collected such as sex, age, primary disease, mode of surgery (double or single lung), ECMO start time, ECMO support mode (V-A or V-V), peroperative ECMO support time, and withdrawal. Groups meeting normal distribution measurements were compared using the independent sample t test. Non-normal distribution measurement data between groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Count data between groups were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability method. The 90 d survival curves of lung transplant recipients supported by ECMO were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, and cumulative survival comparisons were performed using log-rank test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Year distribution of 390 recipients: 32 in 2015, 77 in 2016, 87 in 2017, 97 in 2018, and 97 in 2019. Statistically significant difference was found in the proportion of idiopathic pulmonary hypertension in the primary disease of recipients in the V-A group and V-V group (χ2=12.614, P<0.05), and none of the remaining general data were statistically significant (all P>0.05). When the recipients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertention were removed, the removal rates of ECMO of V-A group and V-V group were 211/224 and 137/146, and there was no statistically significant (χ2=0.021, P>0.05). There were 274 patients in 390 perioperative ECMO recipients received post-operative ECMO support, including 230 in the unextended group and 44 in the extended group. The cumulative survival rates of 30 d, 60 d, and 90 d in the unextended group were 90.9%, 86.5%, and 77.4%, respectively, all significantly higher than the extended group (75.0%, 70.5%, and 59.1%) and were statistically significant (χ2=7.840, P<0.05) . The extended group was divided into 26 in the V-A extended group and 18 in the V-V extended group, with no statistically significant difference in cumulative survival at 30 d, 60 d and 90 d between the two groups (χ2=0.654, P>0.05).

Conclusions

ECMO plays an important role in the perioperative period of lung transplantation. V-V catheterization is performed with small trauma, and V-V ECMO mode is more suitable for patients without severe ventricular dysfunction. Patients with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension should choose V-A ECMO mode. Patients with extended postoperative ECMO support time had worse prognosis than unextended patients.

表1 肺移植围手术期应用ECMO的390例受者临床资料
表2 ECMO采用V-A和V-V置管方式的肺移植受者临床资料比较
图1 肺移植术后ECMO支持时间未延长组和延长组受者生存曲线
图2 肺移植术后ECMO支持时间延长组受者中应用V-A模式与V-V模式受者生存曲线
1
Meyer KC. Recent advances in lung transplantation[J]. F1000Res20187: F1000.
2
Young KA, Dilling DF. The future of lung transplantation[J]. Chest, 2019, 155(3):465-473.
3
Sharma NS, Hartwig MG, Hayes D Jr. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the pre and post lung transplant period[J]. Ann Transl Med, 20175(4):74.
4
Martin AK, Jayaraman AL, Nabzdyk CG, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation: analysis of techniques and outcomes[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2021, 35(2): 644-661.
5
Hoetzenecker K, Benazzo A, Stork T, et al. Bilateral lung transplantation on intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenator: An observational study[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 160(1): 320-327.e1.
6
中华医学会器官移植学分会,国家肺移植质量管理与控制中心. 肺移植围手术期体外膜肺氧合应用指南(2019版)[J]. 器官移植2019, 10(4): 402-409.
7
Veith FJ. Lung transplantation [J]. Transplant Proc, 19779(1): 203-208.
8
Chaves RCF, Rabello Filho R, Timenetsky KT, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a literature review[J]. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva201931(3):410-424.
9
Ratnani I, Tuazon D, Zainab A, et al. The role and impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critical care[J]. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J, 2018, 14(2):110-119.
10
Aigner C, Wisser W, Taghavi S, et al. Institutional experience with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2007, 31(3):468-473; discussion 473-474.
11
Mason DP, Thuita L, Nowicki ER, et al. Should lung transplantation be performed for patients on mechanical respiratory support? The US experience [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010, 139(3): 765-773.e1.
12
Tipograf Y, Salna M, Minko E, et al. Outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2019107(5): 1456-1463.
13
Hoetzenecker K, Schwarz S, Muckenhuber M, et al. Intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and the possibility of postoperative prolongation improve survival in bilateral lung transplantation[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2018, 155(5):2193-2206.e3.
14
Hashimoto K, Hoetzenecker K, Yeung JC, et al.Intraoperative extracorporeal support during lung transplantation in patients bridged with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation[J]. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2018, 37(12):1418-1424.
15
Weingarten N, Schraufnagel D, Plitt G, et al. Comparison of mechanical cardiopulmonary support strategies during lung transplantation[J]. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2020, 17(10): 1075-1093.
16
Appelt H, Philipp A, Mueller T, et al. Factors associated with hemolysis during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-Comparison of VA- versus VV ECMO[J].PLoS One, 2020, 15(1):e0227793.
17
Guimbretière G, Anselmi A, Roisne A, et al. Prognostic impact of blood product transfusion in VA and VV ECMO[J]. Perfusion, 201934(3):246-253.
18
Mou Z, He J, Guan T, et al. Acute kidney injury during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: VA ECMO versus VV ECMO[J]. J Intensive Care Med, 202116: 8850666211035323.
19
Biscotti M, Gannon WD, Agerstrand C, et al. Awake extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as bridge to lung transplantation: A 9-year experience[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017104(2):412-419.
20
杨柯佳,毛文君,陈静瑜. 体外膜肺氧合作为肺移植术前移植桥梁的研究进展[J]. 器官移植2019, 10(2): 202-205.
21
Benazzo A, Schwarz S, Frommlet F, et al. Twenty-year experience with extracorporeal life support as bridge to lung transplantation[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2019, 157(6): 2515-2525.e10.
22
Brida M, Gatzoulis MA. Pulmonary arterial hypertension in adult congenital heart disease[J]. Heart, 2018104(19):1568-1574.
23
Manders E, Bogaard HJ, Handoko ML, et al. Contractile dysfunction of left ventricular cardiomyocytes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2014, 64(1): 28-37.
24
Mosera B, Jakscha P, Taghavia S, et al. Lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension on intraoperative and postoperatively prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation provides optimally controlled reperfusion and excellent outcome[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2018, 53(1):178-185.
25
Salmana J, Iusa F, Sommera W, et al. Mid-term results of bilateral lung transplant with postoperatively extended intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe pulmonary hypertension[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg201752(1):163-170.
26
Ius F, Sommer W, Tudorache I, et al. Five-year experience with intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation: indications and midterm results[J]. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2016, 35(1): 49-58.
27
Hoetzenecker K, Schwarz S, Muckenhuber M, et al. Oxygenation and the possibility of postoperative prolongation improve survival in bilateral lung transplantation[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2018, 155(5):2193-2206.e3.
28
Hoetzenecker K, Benazzo A, Stork T, et al. Bilateral lung transplantation on intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenator: An observational study[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2020160(1):320-327.e1.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[3] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[4] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[5] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[6] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[7] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[8] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[9] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[10] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[11] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[12] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[13] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?