切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 98 -103. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2023.02.005

论著

术前透析方式及时长对肾移植预后的影响
张亚龙, 邱涛, 刘一霆, 王天宇, 孔晨阳, 喻博, 周江桥()   
  1. 430060 武汉大学人民医院器官移植科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-10 出版日期:2023-04-25
  • 通信作者: 周江桥
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81870067,82170664); 武汉市科技计划项目(2020020601012213)

Effects of preoperative dialysis modality and duration on kidney transplantation prognosis

Yalong Zhang, Tao Qiu, Yiting Liu, Tianyu Wang, Chenyang Kong, Bo Yu, Jiangqiao Zhou()   

  1. Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
  • Received:2022-11-10 Published:2023-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Jiangqiao Zhou
引用本文:

张亚龙, 邱涛, 刘一霆, 王天宇, 孔晨阳, 喻博, 周江桥. 术前透析方式及时长对肾移植预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 98-103.

Yalong Zhang, Tao Qiu, Yiting Liu, Tianyu Wang, Chenyang Kong, Bo Yu, Jiangqiao Zhou. Effects of preoperative dialysis modality and duration on kidney transplantation prognosis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 98-103.

目的

探讨术前不同透析方式及时长对肾移植预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年6月在武汉大学人民医院行同种异体肾移植且术前接受透析治疗、术后定期随访的451例受者资料。根据术前透析方式的不同,将451例受者者分为血液透析(HD)组(n=365)和腹膜透析(PD)组(n=86);根据术前透析时长的不同将受者分为透析时长≤1年组(n=214),透析时长>1~<3年组(n=118),透析时长≥3年组(n=119)。随访截至2022年6月30日,比较两组受者肾移植术后不同时间血清肌酐水平、并发症发生率,以及术后3年内受者/移植肾存活率。计量资料采用成组t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验比较,计数资料采用χ2检验比较,两两比较采用χ2分割法(检验水准α′=α/3=0.0167)。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,并采用log-rank检验比较受者/移植肾生存率。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

PD组与HD组受者年龄、性别、体质指数、术前透析时长、术前合并症及原发病等一般资料差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。两组受者移植肾功能恢复良好,术后不同时间血清肌酐水平差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05),且术后移植肾功能延迟恢复(DGF)、肺部感染、急性排斥反应(AR)、移植肾血管并发症、心血管疾病(CVD)及泌尿系统并发症的发生率差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。术前透析时长≤1年、>1~<3年和≥3年的3组受者DGF和AR发生率差异均有统计学意义;其中,透析时长≥3年组DGF和AR发生率均高于透析时长≤1年组(χ2=7.13和13.962,P均<0.0167)。PD组和HD组术后3年受者生存率分别为94.2%和95.3%,移植肾生存率分别为91.9%和91.0%,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.029和0.112,P均>0.05)。术前透析时长≤1年、>1~<3年和≥3年的3组受者术后3年生存率分别为96.3%、94.9%和93.3%,移植肾生存率分别为93.0%、89.8%和89.1%,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=1.483和1.785,P均>0.05)。

结论

肾移植术前不同透析方式对术后移植肾功能恢复、并发症及受者/移植肾生存率无明显影响,但术前透析时长增加会导致术后DGF和AR发生率升高。

Objective

To investigate the impact of different preoperative dialysis modalities and durations on the prognosis of renal transplantation.

Methods

The clinical data of 451 recipients who underwent allogeneic renal transplantation at the Remin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2015 to June 2019, and received dialysis before operation and were followed up regularly after operation were analyzed retrospectively. According to different preoperative dialysis methods, 451 recipients were divided into hemodialysis (HD) group (n=365) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) group (n=86). According to different preoperative dialysis duration, recipients were also divided into dialysis duration ≤1 year group (n=214), dialysis duration >1-<3 years group (n=118), and dialysis duration ≥3 years group (n=119). The follow-up deadline was June 30, 2022. The serum creatinine level, the incidence rate of complications and the survival rate of recipients/transplanted kidneys within 3 years after renal transplantation were compared between the two groups. Measurement data were compared by group t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, enumeration data were compared by χ2 test. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and recipient/graft survival was compared using the log-rank test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were no statistical differences in age, sex, body mass index, length of preoperative dialysis, preoperative complications and primary disease between the PD group and HD group (P>0.05). Renal allograft function recovered well in both groups, there was no statistical difference in serum creatinine level at different time after operation (P>0.05). There were no statistical differences in incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), pulmonary infection, acute rejection (AR), renal allograft vascular complications, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and urinary system complications after operation between the two groups (P>0.05). There were significant differences in the incidence of DGF and AR among the three groups of recipients with preoperative dialysis duration ≤1 year, >1-<3 years and ≥3 years. The incidence of DGF and AR in the group with dialysis duration ≥3 years was higher than that in the group with dialysis duration ≤1 year (χ2=7.13 and 13.962, P<0.0167). The survival rates of recipients at 3 years after operation in the PD group and HD group were 94.2% and 95.3%, respectively, and the survival rates of transplanted kidneys were 91.9% and 91.0%, respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant (χ2=0.029 and 0.112, P>0.05). The 3-year survival rates of recipients in the three groups with preoperative dialysis duration ≤1 year, >1-<3 years and ≥3 years were 96.3%, 94.9% and 93.3%, respectively, and the renal allograft survival rates were 93.0%, 89.8% and 89.1%, respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant (χ2=1.483 and 1.785, P>0.05).

Conclusions

Different dialysis methods before renal transplantation have no significant effect on the recovery of renal allograft function, complications, and recipient/renal allograft survival rate, but the prolonged duration of preoperative dialysis will lead to an increase in the incidence of DGF and AR.

表1 肾移植术前不同透析方式受者一般资料比较
表2 肾移植术前不同透析方式受者术后3年内血清肌酐水平比较(μmol/L,±s)
表3 肾移植术前不同透析时长受者术后并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
图1 肾移植术前不同透析方式受者和移植肾术后生存曲线注:PD组.肾移植术前接受腹膜透析;HD组.肾移植术前接受血液透析;a.受者生存曲线;b.移植肾生存曲线
图2 肾移植术前不同透析时长的受者和移植肾术后生存曲线注:a.受者生存曲线;b.移植肾生存曲线
1
张瑶,周芸. 终末期肾脏病患者肾脏替代治疗的时机选择[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志2022, 42(4) : 764-767.
2
中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肾移植术后移植物功能延迟恢复诊疗技术规范(2019版)[J].器官移植201910(5):521-525.
3
Eikmans M, Gielis EM, Ledeganck KJ, et al. Non-invasive biomarkers of acute rejection in kidney transplantation: novel targets and strategies[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2019, 5:358.
4
马潞林. 慢性移植肾失功的原因和影响因素[J]. 中国血液净化2003, 2(11):593.
5
Lim JH, Jeon Y, Lee SH, et al. Declining trend of preemptive kidney transplantation and impact of pretransplant dialysis: a Korean nationwide prospective cohort study[J]. Transpl Int, 2021, 34(12): 2769-2780.
6
Martins LS, Malheiro J, Pedroso S, et al. Pancreas-kidney transplantation: impact of dialysis modality on the outcome[J]. Transpl Int, 2015, 28(8): 972-979.
7
Molnar MZ, Mehrotra R, Duong U, et al. Dialysis modality and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2012, 7(2): 332-341.
8
Joachim E, Gardezi AI, Chan MR, et al. Association of pre-transplant dialysis modality and post-transplant outcomes: a Meta-analysis[J]. Perit Dial Int, 2017, 37(3): 259-265.
9
Freitas C, Fructuoso M, Martins LS, et al. Posttransplant outcomes of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis patients[J]. Transplant Proc, 2011, 43(1): 113-116.
10
Kramer A, Jager KJ, Fogarty DG, et al. Association between pre-transplant dialysis modality and patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2012, 27(12): 4473-4480.
11
王明君,李艳,李宁,等. 肾移植前不同透析方式对肾移植预后的影响[J]. 中国药物与临床202121(18):3081-3086.
12
Shibata M, Ito I, Tawada H, et al. QT prolongation in dialysis patients: an epidemiological study with a focus on malnutrition[J]. Blood Purif, 2021:1-8.
13
van Walraven C, Austin PC, Knoll G. Predicting potential survival benefit of renal transplantation in patients with chronic kidney disease[J]. CMAJ, 2010, 182(7): 666-672.
14
Yeung SMH, van Londen M, Nakshbandi U, et al. Pretransplant NT-proBNP, dialysis vintage, and posttransplant mortality in kidney transplant recipients[J]. Transplantation, 2020, 104(10): 2158-2165.
15
Meier-Kriesche HU, Kaplan B. Waiting time on dialysis as the strongest modifiable risk factor for renal transplant outcomes: a paired donor kidney analysis[J]. Transplantation, 2002, 74(10): 1377-1381.
16
Goldfarb-Rumyantzev A, Hurdle JF, Scandling J, et al. Duration of end-stage renal disease and kidney transplant outcome[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2005, 20(1): 167-175.
17
Helanterä I, Salmela K, Kyllonen L, et al. Pretransplant dialysis duration and risk of death after kidney transplantation in the current era[J]. Transplantation, 2014, 98(4): 458-464.
18
Goto N, Okada M, Yamamoto T, et al. Association of dialysis duration with outcomes after transplantation in a Japanese cohort[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2016, 11(3): 497-504.
19
Haller MC, Kainz A, Baer H, et al. Dialysis vintage and outcomes after kidney transplantation: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2017, 12(1): 122-130.
20
Kessler M, Ladriere M, Giral M, et al. Does pre-emptive kidney transplantation with a deceased donor improve outcomes? Results from a French transplant network[J]. Transpl Int, 2011, 24(3): 266-275.
21
Augustine JJ, Poggio ED, Clemente M, et al. Hemodialysis vintage, black ethnicity, and pretransplantation antidonor cellular immunity in kidney transplant recipients[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2007, 18(5): 1602-1606.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[3] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[4] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[5] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[6] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[7] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[8] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[9] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[10] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[11] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[12] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[13] 陈晓鹏, 王佳妮, 练庆海, 杨九妹. 肝细胞癌VOPP1表达及其与预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 876-882.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要