切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 86 -92. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2025.02.003

论著

成人肾移植后淋巴增殖性疾病临床特征及预后影响因素分析
吴晴航, 吴建永()   
  1. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院肾脏病中心 浙江省肾脏病防治技术研究重点实验室 浙江大学肾脏病研究所
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-30 出版日期:2025-04-25
  • 通信作者: 吴建永
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(81970647)

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors analysis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in adult kidney transplant recipients

Qinghang Wu, Jianyong Wu()   

  1. Kidney Disease Center, Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease Prevention and Control Technology, Institute of Nephrology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
  • Received:2024-12-30 Published:2025-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Jianyong Wu
引用本文:

吴晴航, 吴建永. 成人肾移植后淋巴增殖性疾病临床特征及预后影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 86-92.

Qinghang Wu, Jianyong Wu. Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors analysis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in adult kidney transplant recipients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(02): 86-92.

目的

探讨成人肾移植受者移植后淋巴增殖性疾病(PTLD)的临床特征和转归。

方法

回顾性分析浙江大学医学院附属第一医院2013年9月1日至2024年8月30日肾移植术后确诊PTLD的41例肾移植受者临床资料。正态分布计量资料组间比较采用成组t检验;非正态分布计量资料组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis检验;计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。以受者死亡为观察终点,绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,组间生存率比较采用log-rank检验。采用Cox比例风险模型分析影响受者生存的危险因素。连续变量的临界值由受试者操作特征曲线确认。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

随访截至2024年11月30日,14例受者死亡,27例存活。存活组与死亡组受者移植至PTLD确诊时间和多器官受累情况差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。PTLD确诊时,存活组和死亡组受者血清肌酐分别为111.0(86.0~177.0)μmol/L和142.5(123.8~171.8)μmol/L,差异有统计学意义(H=4.694,P<0.05)。41例肾移植受者确诊PTLD后平均总生存期为(83±11)个月(1~132个月),移植至PTLD确诊时间>1年的受者生存率低于≤1年者(χ2=4.044,P<0.05);存在多器官受累受者生存率低于不存在者(χ2=4.368,P<0.05)。多因素Cox比例风险回归分析示,移植至PTLD确诊时间>1年(HR=0.108,95%CI:0.013~0.992)、乳酸脱氢酶>285 U/L(HR=0.171,95%CI:0.034~0.874)和多器官受累(HR=0.182,95%CI:0.039~0.856)均为影响PTLD受者生存的独立危险因素(P均<0.05)。接受R-序贯疗法与接受R-CHOP或其他含R化疗方案的受者生存率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.001,P>0.05);治疗后达到淋巴瘤缓解的受者生存率高于未达到者(χ2=15.859,P<0.05)。EB病毒(EBV)和CMV感染在早发型PTLD组中更为常见(P均<0.05)。

结论

成人肾移植受者PTLD预后差,EBV和CMV感染常见于早发型PTLD;确诊PTLD至移植后间隔>1年、多器官受累和乳酸脱氢酶升高是影响受者生存的危险因素。

Objective

To investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in adult kidney transplant recipients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 41 kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with PTLD at the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from September 1, 2013, to August 30, 2024. Intergroup comparisons of normally distributed measurement data were performed using group t-test; non-normally distributed measurement data were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test; categorical data were compared using the chi-square test or the Fisher′s exact test. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted with recipient death as the endpoint, and intergroup survival rates were compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze risk factors affecting recipient survival. Cutoff values for continuous variables were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

As of November 30, 2024, 14 recipients had died, and 27 were alive. Significant differences were observed between the survival and death groups in the time from transplantation to PTLD diagnosis and the situation of presence of multi-organ involvement (all P <0.05). At the time of PTLD diagnosis, serum creatinine levels were 111.0 (86.0-177.0) μmol/L in the survival group and 142.5 (123.8-171.8) μmol/L in the death group, with a statistically significant difference (H=4.694, P<0.05). The average overall survival period after PTLD diagnosis in the 41 kidney transplant recipients was (83±11) months (1-132 months). Recipients with a time from transplantation to PTLD diagnosis >1 year had a lower survival rate than those with≤1 year (χ2=4.044, P<0.05); recipients with multi-organ involvement had a lower survival rate than those without (χ2=4.368, P<0.05). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that a time from transplantation to PTLD diagnosis>1 year (HR=0.108, 95%CI: 0.013-0.992), lactate dehydrogenase>285 U/L (HR=0.171, 95%CI: 0.034-0.874), and multi-organ involvement (HR=0.182, 95%CI: 0.039-0.856) were independent risk factors affecting the survival of PTLD recipients (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in survival rates between recipients receiving R-sequential therapy and those receiving R-CHOP or other R-containing chemotherapy regimens (χ2=0.001, P>0.05); recipients who achieved lymphoma remission after treatment had a higher survival rate than those who did not (χ2=15.859, P<0.05). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and CMV infections were more common in the early-onset PTLD group (all P<0.05).

Conclusions

Adult kidney transplant recipients who diagnosed with PTLD have a poor prognosis, EBV and CMV infections are more common in early-onset PTLD. Time of diagnosis >1 year post-transplantation, multi-organ involvement, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels are risk factors for survival.

表1 肾移植术后并发PTLD受者随访截止时存活组和死亡组一般资料比较
图1 肾移植术后并发PTLD受者生存曲线注:a.总生存率;b.移植至PTLD确诊时间;c.多器官受累;d.性别;e.供肾类型;f.EBV感染状态;g.CMV感染状态;h.排斥反应;PTLD.移植后淋巴增殖性疾病;EBV.EB病毒
表2 肾移植术后并发PTLD受者生存率单因素Cox比例风险回归分析(n=41)
表3 肾移植术后并发PTLD受者生存率多因素Cox比例风险回归分析(n=41)
图2 肾移植术后并发PTLD接受治疗后及治疗后不同状态受者生存曲线注:a.接受R-序贯疗法与接受R-CHOP或其他含R化疗方案的受者比较;b.治疗后达到完全缓解或部分缓解的受者与未达到者比较;PTLD.移植后淋巴增殖性疾病
表4 肾移植至PTLD确诊时间≤1年与>1年受者一般资料比较
1
Augustine J. Kidney transplant: new opportunities and challenges[J]. Cleve Clin J Med, 2018, 85(2): 138-144.
2
Absalon MJ, Khoury RA, Phillips CLJSiPS. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after solid organ transplant in children[J].Semin Pediatr Surg, 201726(4) :257-266.
3
Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al.Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification[J]. J Clin Oncol, 201432(27):3059-3068.
4
Maksten EF, Vase Kampmann J, et al. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder following kidney transplantation: a population-based cohort study[J]. Transpl Int, 2016, 29(4): 483-493.
5
刘占祥,黄文荣. 移植后淋巴细胞增殖性疾病诊断进展与治疗规范[J].白血病淋巴瘤201726(8):502-505.
6
Ergisi M, Ooi B, Salim O, et al. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders following kidney transplantation: a literature review with updates on risk factors, prognostic indices, screening strategies, treatment and analysis of donor type[J]. Transplant Rev (Orlando), 2024, 38(2): 100837.
7
Fulchiero R, Amaral S. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease after pediatric kidney transplant[J]. Front Pediatr, 2022, 10: 1087864.
8
Dierickx D, Habermann TM. Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders in adults[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378(6): 549-562.
9
Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al.WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues[M]. Revised 4th ed. Lyon, France: IARC Press, 2017.
10
陈奥,练巧燕,张建恒,等. 移植后淋巴增殖性疾病研究进展[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志:电子版2021, 15(5) :307-312.
11
Quinlan SC, Pfeiffer RM, Morton LM, et al. Risk factors for early-onset and late-onset post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in kidney recipients in the United States[J]. Am J Hematol, 2011, 86(2):206-209.
12
Lubetzky M, Tantisattamo E, Molnar MZ, et al. The failing kidney allograft: a review and recommendations for the care and management of a complex group of patients[J]. Am J Transplant202121(9):2937-2949.
13
Fernberg P, Edgren G, Adami J, et al. Time trends in risk and risk determinants of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in solid organ transplant recipients[J]. Am J Transplant, 2011, 11(11):2472-2482.
14
Sprangers B, Riella LV, Dierickx D. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder following kidney transplantation: a review[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2021, 78(2):272-281.
15
van Leeuwen MT, Grulich AE, Webster AC, et al. Immunosuppression and other risk factors for early and late non-Hodgkin lymphoma after kidney transplantation[J]. Blood, 2009, 114(3):630-637.
16
Khedmat H, Taheri S. Early onset post transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders: analysis of international data from 5 studies[J]. Ann Transplant, 2009, 14(3):74-77.
17
Leblond V, Davi F, Charlotte F, et al. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders not associated with Epstein-Barr virus: a distinct entity?[J]. J Clin Oncol, 199816(6):2052-2059.
18
Khedmat H, Taheri S. Very late onset lymphoproliferative disorders occurring over 10 years post-renal transplantation: PTLD.Int. Survey[J]. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther, 20114(2):73-80.
19
Manez R, Breinig MC, Linden P, et al. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease in primary Epstein-Barr virus infection after liver transplantation: the role of cytomegalovirus disease[J]. J Infect Dis, 1997, 176(6): 1462-1467.
20
Evens AM, David KA, Helenowski I, et al. Multicenter analysis of 80 solid organ transplantation recipients with post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease: outcomes and prognostic factors in the modern era[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(6):1038-1046.
21
Reshef R, Vardhanabhuti S, Luskin MR, et al. Reduction of immunosuppression as initial therapy for posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder(★)[J]. Am J Transplant, 2011, 11(2):336-347.
22
Kasiske BL, Kukla A, Thomas D, et al. Lymphoproliferative disorders after adult kidney transplant: epidemiology and comparison of registry report with claims-based diagnoses[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 201158(6):971-980.
23
韦星,李响,陈昌庆,等.肾移植术后并发移植后淋巴细胞增殖性疾病一例诊疗分析并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志:电子版2021, 15(1): 36-41.
24
Caillard S, Porcher R, Provot F, et al. Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder after kidney transplantation: report of a nationwide French registry and the development of a new prognostic score[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(10):1302-1309.
25
Ghobrial IM, Habermann TM, Macon WR, et al. Differences between early and late posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders in solid organ transplant patients: are they two different diseases?[J]. Transplantation, 2005, 79(2):244-247.
26
Caillard S, Lamy FX, Quelen C, et al. Epidemiology of post transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in adult kidney and kidney pancreas recipients: report of the French registry and analysis of subgroups of lymphomas[J]. Am J Transplant, 2012, 12(3):682-693.
27
Trappe R, Oertel S, Leblond V, et al. Sequential treatment with rituximab followed by CHOP chemotherapy in adult B-cell post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD): the prospective international multicentre phase 2 PTLD-1 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2012, 13(2):196-206.
28
Trappe RU, Dierickx D, Zimmermann H, et al. Response to rituximab induction is a predictive marker in B-cell post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and allows successful stratification into rituximab or r-chop consolidation in an international, prospective, multicenter phase Ⅱ Trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 201735(5):536-543.
[1] 孙瑜博, 陈瑞, 翟亦晖, 汤梁峰, 张致庆, 王春燕, 耿红全, 沈茜, 刘锋, 徐虹. 合并膀胱功能障碍儿童肾移植受者疗效评估[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 2-8.
[2] 陈晓彬, 聂晓晶, 翁增凤, 刘婧婧, 黄隽. PAX2基因变异致Papillorenal综合征儿童肾移植四例[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-15.
[3] 姜梦婕, 黄淑娟, 裴瑜馨, 容丽萍, 许园园, 林知朗, 丘原全, 刘龙山, 蒋小云, 陈丽植. 儿童复发性移植肾肾病临床特点及诊治[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 16-21.
[4] 曾锦华, 韩新利, 徐虹, 翟亦晖, 刘锋, 陈瑞, 方晓燕, 张致庆, 王春燕, 陈径, 沈茜. 儿童肾移植受者移植后淋巴组织增生性疾病临床特点及诊治[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 22-25.
[5] 金小艳, 邓芳, 方韶晗, 丁亚婷. 儿童肾移植受者心脏结构及功能分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 26-30.
[6] 余成军, 张杰, 裴军, 孔繁森, 杨舒媛, 吴盛德, 刘星, 温晟, 华燚, 魏光辉. 终末期肾病儿童肾移植临床特征和疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-35.
[7] 李一萱, 李美和, 郑瑾. 肾移植缺血再灌注损伤机制及其对移植肾的影响[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 43-49.
[8] 李道文, 张鹏, 陈正, 方佳丽. 实体器官移植对脑结构和功能影响的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 50-53.
[9] 王明君, 李宁, 李燕, 尚丽红, 郭文萍, 吕广娜, 武媛婷, 武小桐. 补体结合的供者特异性抗体对稳定期肾移植受者预后影响的临床总结[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 54-59.
[10] 王国辉, 韩士超, 戚若晨, 张小燕, 徐桐, 张阳, 范效铮, 魏迪, 刘克普, 马帅军, 杨晓剑, 秦卫军. 异种移植——猪供肾获取手术方案经验交流[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-64.
[11] 王奇, 李林峰, 林启盛, 龚朝阳, 连文清, 龙永富, 黄亚强. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第23期)——VHL综合征并双侧肾细胞癌[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 272-277.
[12] 唐敏英, 邬绿莹, 陈津, 路君, 吴仲秋. 肾移植术后BKV 肾病免疫细胞浸润及关键基因分析[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(01): 12-19.
[13] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[14] 沈成龙, 刘海晨, 周放, 郭健, 石志良, 侍新宇, 周国强, 何宋兵. 内脏脂肪面积及肌肉减少症对结直肠癌患者手术疗效及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 83-90.
[15] 李菲, 郭晓夏, 郑悦, 郑爔, 李鑫成, 李文雄. 他汀类药物对甘油三酯葡萄糖指数增高的脓毒症相关急性肾损伤患者预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 68-76.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?