切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04) : 201 -205. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2017.04.002

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

移植肾动脉狭窄诊断及介入治疗效果评价
陈忠宝1, 周江桥1,(), 邱涛1, 张龙1, 马枭雄1, 邹寄林1, 胡红耀2, 赵辉2, 吴振中2, 王畅2   
  1. 1. 430060 武汉大学人民医院器官移植科
    2. 430060 武汉大学人民医院介入科
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-20 出版日期:2017-11-25
  • 通信作者: 周江桥
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学青年基金(81400753)

Diagnosis and endovascular management of the transplant renal artery stenosis

Zhongbao Chen1, Jiangqiao Zhou1,(), Tao Qiu1, Long Zhang1, Xiaoxiong Ma1, Jilin Zou1, Hongyao Hu2, Hui Zhao2, Zhengzhong Wu2, Chang Wang2   

  1. 1. Department of Organ Transplantation, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
    2. Department of Intervention, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
  • Received:2017-10-20 Published:2017-11-25
  • Corresponding author: Jiangqiao Zhou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhou Jiangqiao
引用本文:

陈忠宝, 周江桥, 邱涛, 张龙, 马枭雄, 邹寄林, 胡红耀, 赵辉, 吴振中, 王畅. 移植肾动脉狭窄诊断及介入治疗效果评价[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(04): 201-205.

Zhongbao Chen, Jiangqiao Zhou, Tao Qiu, Long Zhang, Xiaoxiong Ma, Jilin Zou, Hongyao Hu, Hui Zhao, Zhengzhong Wu, Chang Wang. Diagnosis and endovascular management of the transplant renal artery stenosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(04): 201-205.

目的

比较肾移植术后移植肾动脉狭窄(TRAS)不同诊断方法的价值并总结血管内介入治疗经验。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2017年6月武汉大学人民医院器官移植科25例肾移植术后发生TRAS受者临床资料。所有受者均行移植肾彩色多普勒血流显像(CDFI)、磁共振血管成像(MRA)、移植肾数字减影血管造影(DSA)检查。TRAS经DSA确诊后立即行介入治疗,轻度狭窄受者术中予球囊扩张,中、重度狭窄受者根据球囊扩张后的狭窄段管径及长度植入合适动脉支架。根据移植肾动脉峰值流速(PSV)将TRAS受者分为高速血流组(PSV>120 cm/s)和低速血流组(PSV<50 cm/s),比较两组介入治疗前后移植肾动脉平均PSV和阻力指数。采用Fisher确切概率法比较CDFI与MRA对TRAS确诊率;采用配对t检验比较受者介入治疗前后24 h尿量、平均动脉压、血清肌酐、肾小球滤过率(GFR),采用配对t检验比较高速血流组和低速血流组平均PSV、阻力指数。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

CDFI与MRA对TRAS确诊率分别为68%(17/25)、84.0%(21/25),差异无统计学意义(P=0.57)。DSA检查示轻、中、重度狭窄分别为7、13、5例。7例轻度狭窄受者均予术中球囊扩张;2例肾动脉主干近端及远端两处狭窄受者(重度狭窄)、1例肾动脉及1支副肾动脉均狭窄受者(重度狭窄)术中接受球囊扩张后再植入2根动脉支架;1例肾动脉及2支副肾动脉均狭窄受者(重度狭窄)术中接受球囊扩张后再植入3根动脉支架;余14例受者(中度狭窄13例、重度狭窄1例)术中接受球囊扩张后再植入1根动脉支架。介入治疗前后24 h尿量、平均动脉压、血清肌酐和GFR分别为(1 956±615)和(2 752±729)mL、(117±13)和(96±8)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)、(190±50)和(109±22)μmol/L、(39±12)和(66±8)mL/min,差异均有统计学意义(t=4.17、6.59、7.35、9.48,P均<0.05)。17例高速血流组介入治疗前后肾动脉平均PSV、阻力指数分别为(151±27)和(87±28)cm/s、(0.77±0.05)和(0.56±0.06),差异均有统计学意义(t=6.35、4.38,P均<0.05);8例低速血流组介入治疗前后肾动脉平均PSV、阻力指数分别为(39±9)和(80±16)cm/s、0.56±0.06和0.66±0.04,差异均有统计学意义(t=6.33、3.92,P均<0.05)。截至2017年10月,随访时间4~36个月,25例TRAS受者介入治疗后未见动脉血栓、再狭窄等并发症;介入治疗后分别各有1例出现上消化道出血、移植侧髂外静脉血栓,经治疗后均好转;1例于介入治疗后第3天出现肺部感染,1个月后因呼吸衰竭死亡。

结论

MRA与CDFI对于TRAS的诊断价值相似,介入治疗可明显改善TRAS患者相关症状,有效恢复其肾脏血流灌注、改善肾脏功能。

Objective

To compare the value of different diagnostic methods on transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) and summarize the treatment experience of interventional therapy on TRAS.

Methods

The clinical data of 25 recipients who suffered TRAS after renal transpantation in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2010 to June 2017 were analysed. All recipients accepted color doppler flowing image (CDFI), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Recipients received interventional therapy immediately after they were diagnosed with TRAS by DSA, mild stenosis recipients were treated with balloon dilatation, moderate stenosis and severe stenosis recipients were treated with balloon dilatation and artery stent. TRAS recipients were divided into fast blood flow group and slow blood flow group, the media peak systolic velocity (PSV) of transplant artery and resistance index between the 2 groups were compared. Diagnosis rate of CDFI and MRA on TRAS were compared with Fisher′s exact test. The indexes like 24 hour urine volume, mean arterial pressure, serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) before and after operation were compared with paired t test; the media PSV and resistance index of fast blood flow group and slow blood flow group were also compared with paired t test. P<0.05 was considered statitically significant.

Results

Diagnosis rate of CDFI and MRA on TRAS were 68% (17/25) and 84.0% (21/25), which had no statitical significance (P=0.57). The test results of DSA showed that there were 7 cases of mild stenosis recipients, 13 cases of moderate stenosis recipients and 5 cases of severe stenosis recipients. All the mild stenosis recipients received balloon dilatation, other recipients received balloon dilatation and artery stent. Twenty-four hour urine volume, mean arterial pressure, serum creatinine and GFR of fast blood flow group and slow blood flow group before and after operation were (1 956±615) and (2 752±729) mL, (117±13) and (96±8) mmHg, (190±50) and (109±22) μmol/L, (39±12) and (66±8) mL/min, all of them had statitical significance (t=4.17, 6.59, 7.35, 9.48, P all<0.05). Media PSV and resistance index of fast blood flow group (n=17) before and after operation were (151±27) and (87±28) cm/s, 0.77±0.05 and 0.56±0.06, all of them had statitical significance (t=6.35, 4.38, P all<0.05). Media PSV and resistance index of slow blood flow group (n=8) before and after operation were (39±9) and (80±16) cm/s, (0.56±0.06) and (0.66±0.04), all of them had statitical significance (t=6.33, 3.92, P all<0.05). Postoperative follow-up time of 25 TRAS recipients was 4-36 months up to October 2017, complications like artery thrombosis and restenosis were not observed; gastrointestinal bleeding (n=1) and vena iliaca externa thrombosis (n=1) were observed after interventional therapy; 1 case catched pulmonary infection on the third day after interventional therapy and died of respiratory failure 1 month later.

Conclusions

MRA and CDFI perform similar value in diagnosing TRAS. Interventional therapycould rectify the clinical symptoms and renal function by restoring transplant renal blood filtration.

1
Bruno S,Remuzzi G,Ruggenenti P. Transplant renal artery stenosis[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004, 15(1): 134-141.
2
杜杨春,陈正,廖德怀, 等. 移植肾动脉狭窄的诊断和治疗探讨[J]. 广东医学, 2010, 31(17): 2278-2281.
3
姜伟,高建,刘彦斌, 等. 移植肾动脉血管并发症29例报道并文献复习[J]. 器官移植, 2015, 6(4): 258-261.
4
刘亚民,吕良山,田红燕, 等. 肾动脉狭窄的介入治疗[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2004, 12(4): 262-265.
5
邹英华. 重新认识肾动脉狭窄的发生与发展,规范肾动脉狭窄的介入治疗[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2007, 16(7): 433-435.
6
梅秀荣. 彩色多普勒超声在动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄诊断中的应用[J]. 医药前沿, 2014, (35): 185-186.
7
Touma J,Costanzo A,Boura B, et al. Endovascular management of transplant renal artery stenosis[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2014, 59(4): 1058-1065.
8
刘燕娜,苗芸. 移植肾动脉狭窄的病因与发病机制[J]. 中华器官移植杂志, 2016, 37(1): 56-58.
9
Kamali K,Abbasi MA,Behzadi AH, et al. Incidence and risk factors of transplant renal artery stenosis in living unrelated donor renal transplantation[J]. J Ren Care, 2010, 36(3): 149-152.
10
Lechevallier E,Bretheau D,Berland Y, et al. Outcome of kidney transplants with multiple arteries[J]. Prog Urol, 1995, 5(3): 370-376.
11
Salsamendi J,Pereira K,Baker R, et al. Successful technical and clinical outcome using a second generation balloon expandable coronary stent for transplant renal artery stenosis: Our experience[J]. J Radiol Case Rep, 2015, 9(10): 9-17.
12
Hedegard W,Saad WE,Davies MG. Management of vascular and nonvascular complications after renal transplantation[J]. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol, 2009, 12(4): 240-262.
13
Tafur-Soto JD,White CJ. Renal artery stenosis[J]. Cardiol Clin, 2015, 33(1): 59-73.
14
王旭珍,薛武军,丁小明, 等. 彩色多普勒超声诊断移植肾动脉狭窄的临床应用价值[J]. 中华器官移植杂志, 2016, 37(9): 537-540.
15
Abuagla EM,Pei TS. Utility of color doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of renal artery stenosis in comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography[J]. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl, 2014, 25(2): 309-315.
16
Braga AF,Catto RC,Dalio MB, et al. Endovascular approach to transplant renal artery stenosis[J]. Ann Transplant, 2015, 20: 698-706.
[1] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[3] 杨小菁, 姜瑞瑞, 石玉香, 王静静, 李长天. 乳腺孤立性纤维性肿瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 375-377.
[4] 冯雪园, 韩萌萌, 马宁. 乳腺原发上皮样血管内皮瘤一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 378-380.
[5] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[6] 陈永沛, 仲海燕, 陈勇, 王慜, 王倩, 邹鸣立, 袁斯明. 数字减影血管造影在腓动脉穿支皮瓣移植中的应用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 507-510.
[7] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[8] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[9] 杨红杰, 张智春, 孙轶. 直肠癌淋巴结转移诊断研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 512-518.
[10] 赵立力, 王魁向, 张小冲, 李志远. 血沉与C-反应蛋白比值在假体周围感染中的诊断价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 351-355.
[11] 吴凤芸, 滕鑫, 刘连娟. 高帧频超声造影与增强磁共振对不同直径原发性高分化肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 404-408.
[12] 孙欣欣, 刘军, 陈超伍, 孙超. 超声内镜引导细针穿刺抽吸术在胰腺占位性病变中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 418-421.
[13] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
[14] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[15] 周婷, 孙培培, 张二明, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断现状调查[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 790-797.
阅读次数
全文


摘要