切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 143 -148. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2020.03.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

肝细胞肝癌肝移植受者术后生存及肿瘤复发临床分析
季家祥1, 关鸽1, 孙延东2, 王新2, 刘欢2, 臧运金2, 郭源1,()   
  1. 1. 266000 青岛大学附属医院肝脏病中心
    2. 266000 青岛大学附属医院器官移植中心
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-23 出版日期:2020-06-25
  • 通信作者: 郭源
  • 基金资助:
    山东省重点研发计划(2017GSF218098); 青岛市民生科技计划项目(17-3-3-13-nsh)

Clinical analysis of postoperative survival and tumor recurrence after liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Jiaxiang Ji1, Ge Guan1, Yandong Sun2, Xin Wang2, Huan Liu2, Yunjin Zang2, Yuan Guo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Liver Disease Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
    2. Organ Transplantation Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
  • Received:2019-10-23 Published:2020-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Yuan Guo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Guo Yuan, Email:
引用本文:

季家祥, 关鸽, 孙延东, 王新, 刘欢, 臧运金, 郭源. 肝细胞肝癌肝移植受者术后生存及肿瘤复发临床分析[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 143-148.

Jiaxiang Ji, Ge Guan, Yandong Sun, Xin Wang, Huan Liu, Yunjin Zang, Yuan Guo. Clinical analysis of postoperative survival and tumor recurrence after liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 143-148.

目的

比较符合米兰标准和杭州标准的肝细胞肝癌(HCC)肝移植受者术后生存及肿瘤复发情况,分析移植术后生存和肿瘤复发影响因素。

方法

回顾性分析青岛大学附属医院器官移植中心2014年2月1日至2018年12月31日符合米兰标准和杭州标准的119例HCC肝移植受者临床资料。符合米兰标准受者79例(米兰标准组),超出米兰标准但符合杭州标准者受者40例(杭州标准组)。所有受者肝移植术后均规律随访,收集受者性别、年龄和手术时间等临床资料。无瘤生存时间以受者移植术后发现肿瘤复发转移为观察终点,累积生存时间以受者移植术后死亡为观察终点。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,采用log-rank检验比较组间累积生存率和无瘤生存率。采用Cox比例风险模型进行影响累积生存时间和无瘤生存时间的单因素和多因素分析。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

截至2019年7月31日,119例受者术后中位随访时间为27个月(15~43个月),其中术后因肿瘤复发死亡11例复发转移27例。米兰标准组受者1、3和5年累积生存率分别为98.7%、90.2%和90.2%,杭州标准组分别为97.2%、73.9%和73.9%,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.219、1.598和1.598,P均>0.05)。米兰标准组受者1、3和5年累积无瘤生存率分别为90.3%、82.1%和68.6%,杭州标准组分别为81.6%、56.0%和56.0%,两组受者术后1年和5年累积无瘤生存率差异均无统计学意义(χ2=1.587和3.707,P均>0.05),3年累积无瘤生存率差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.543,P<0.05)。多因素分析结果证实术前有无脉管癌栓是影响其累积生存率的独立危险因素,差异有统计学意义(HR=0.159,P<0.05);术前有无脉管癌栓和病理分化类型是影响无瘤生存的独立危险因素,差异均有统计学意义(HR=0.338和0.395,P均<0.05)。

结论

符合杭州标准的HCC肝移植受者移植术后可获得较好的累积生存率及无瘤生存率,受者术前是否存在脉管癌栓及病理分化程度可以指导移植术后肿瘤复发的预防。

Objective

To compare the postoperative survival and tumor recurrence of liver transplant recipients of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) conforming to Milan criteria and Hangzhou criteria, and analyze the influencing factors of postoperative survival and tumor recurrence.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made on 119 HCC patients who met Milan criteria and Hangzhou criteria for liver transplantation from February 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018 in the organ transplantation center of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. There were 79 recipients who met the Milan criteria (Milan criteria group) and 40 recipients who exceeded the Milan criteria but met the Hangzhou criteria (Hangzhou criteria group). All the included recipients received regular follow-up after liver transplantation to collect clinical data such as gender, age and time of operation. The disease-free survival time was determined by the recurrence and metastasis of tumor after transplantation, and the cumulative survival time was determined by the death of the recipient after transplantation. Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw survival curve, log-rank test was used to compare the cumulative survival rate and tumor-free survival rate between groups. Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the single factor and multiple factors affecting cumulative survival time and tumor-free survival time. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

As of July 31, 2019, the median follow-up time of 119 recipients was 27 months (15-43 months), of which 11 died of tumor recurrence and 27 relapsed and metastasized. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative survival rates in the Milan criteria group were 98.7%, 90.2% and 90.2%, respectively, and in the Hangzhou criteria group were 97.2%, 73.9% and 73.9%, respectively. No significant difference was found in the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative survival rate between the 2 groups (χ2=0.219, 1.598 and 1.598, P all> 0.05). The 1-, 3-and 5-year cumulative disease-free survival rates in the Milan criteria group were 90.3%, 82.1% and 68.6%, respectively, and in the Hangzhou criteria group were 81.6%, 56.0% and 56.0%, respectively. No significant difference was found in the 1-year and 5-year cumulative disease-free survival rate between the 2 groups (χ2=1.587 and 3.707, P all >0.05), and there was statistically significant difference in the 3-year cumulative disease-free survival rate (χ2=5.543, P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the presence or absence of vascular tumor thrombus before transplantation was an independent risk factor affecting the cumulative survival rate, and the difference was statistically significant (HR=0.159, P<0.05). The presence or absence of vascular tumor thrombus and pathological differentiation type before transplantation were independent risk factors affecting tumor-free survival, with statistically significant differences (HR=0.338 and 0.395, P all<0.05).

Conclusions

HCC liver transplant recipients who meet Hangzhou criteria can obtain satisfactory cumulative survival rate and disease-free survival rate after transplantation. Whether the recipient has vascular tumor thrombus before operation and the degree of pathological differentiation can guide the prevention of tumor recurrence after transplantation.

图1 米兰标准组和杭州标准组受者肝移植术后生存曲线
图2 米兰标准组和杭州标准组受者肝移植术后无瘤生存曲线
表1 HCC肝移植受者术后生存影响因素分析
表2 HCC肝移植受者术后无瘤生存影响因素分析
1
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
2
Feng RM, Zong YN, Cao SM, et al. Current cancer situation in China: good or bad news from the 2018 Global Cancer Statistics?[J]. Cancer Commun (Lond), 2019, 39(1): 22.
3
Gong YZ, Jiang YA. Abnormal expression of some genes in the occurreuee and development of hepatoeellular carcinoma and their significance for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chin J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 25(8): 848-851.
4
中国医师协会器官移植医师分会,中华医学会器官移植学分会. 中国肝癌肝移植临床实践指南(2018版)[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版,2018, 12(4): 145-150.
5
刘子荣,张雅敏. 肝癌肝移植术后复发转移的防治与评估[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志,2018, 24(6): 424-426.
6
Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 1996, 334(11): 693-699.
7
Leung JY, Zhu AX, Gordon FD, et al. Liver transplantation outcomes for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a multicenter study[J]. Liver Transpl, 2004, 10(11): 1343-1354.
8
Zheng SS, Xu X, Wu J, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Hangzhou experiencesl[J]. Transplantation, 2008, 85(12): 1726-1732.
9
Chen J, Xu X, Wu J, et al. The stratifying value of Hangzhou criteria in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(3): e93128.
10
Lei JY, Wang WT, Yan LN. Hangzhou criteria for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center experience[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2014, 26(2): 200-204.
11
Brito AF, Abrantes AM, Tralhao JG, et al. Targeting hepatocellular carcinoma: what did we discover so far?[J]. Oncol Rev, 2016, 10(2): 302.
12
Balogh J, Victor D, Asham EH, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: a review[J]. J Hepatocell Carcinoma, 2016, 3: 41-53.
13
Rude MK, Crippin JS. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2015, 17(3): 11.
14
Yao FY, Ferrell L, Bass NM, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: expansion of the tumor size limits does not adversely impact survival[J]. Hepatology, 2001, 33(6): 1394-1403.
15
樊嘉,周俭,徐泱,等. 肝癌肝移植适应证的选择:上海复旦标准[J]. 中华医学杂志,2006, 86(18): 1227-1231.
16
Xia W, Ke Q, Guo H, et al. Expansion of the Milan criteria without any sacrifice: combination of the Hangzhou criteria with the pre-transplant platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio[J]. BMC Cancer, 2017, 17(1): 14.
17
Audet M, Panaro F, Piardi T, et al. Are the Hangzhou criteria adaptable to hepatocellular carcinoma patients for liver transplantation in Western countries?[J]. Liver Transpl, 2009, 15(7): 822-826.
18
Qu Z, Ling Q, Gwiasda J, et al. Hangzhou criteria are more accurate than Milan criteria in predicting long-term survival after liver transplantation for HCC in Germany[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2018, 403(5): 643-654.
19
吕少诚,潘冰,李立新,等. 不同肝癌肝移植标准受者预后分析[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版,2019, 13(3): 206-209.
20
Lee KW, Park JW, Joh JW, et al. Can we expand the Milan criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma in living donor liver transplantation?[J]. Transplant Proc, 2004, 36(8): 2289-2290.
21
Bismuth H, Majno PE, Adam R. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Semin Liver Dis, 1999, 19(3): 311-322.
22
鞠明光,徐锋,戴朝六. 肝细胞癌微血管侵犯研究对外科肿瘤学切缘的启示[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献:电子版,2018, 12(5): 292-296.
23
Mazzaferro V, Rondinara GF, Rossi G, et al. Milan multicenter experience in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Transplant Proc, 1994, 26(6): 3557-3560.
24
曹晓伟,季峻松,陈婷,等. 肝癌临床病理特征与肝移植术后预后的多因素相关分析[J]. 第二军医大学学报,2008, 29(9): 1086-1090.
25
邵浙新,徐骁,郑树森,等. 肝细胞癌患者肝移植术后甲胎蛋白的变化与肿瘤复发[J]. 中华普通外科杂志,2006, 21(5): 351-353.
26
彭志海,孙红成. 肝移植术后肝癌复发[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2016, 15(5): 444-447.
27
Pompili M, Francica G, Ponziani FR, et al. Bridging and downstaging treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(43): 7515-7530.
28
赵扬,郭源,关鸽,等. 局部治疗在中国肝细胞癌肝移植中的应用分析[J/CD]. 实用器官移植电子杂志,2019, 7(1): 40-43.
[1] . 肝移植治疗终末期肝病[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 1-.
[2] 李坤河, 寇萌佳, 邝立挺. 肝移植术后二次气管插管的危险因素及预测模型的建立[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 366-371.
[3] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 上海医药行业协会. 中国肝、肾移植受者霉酚酸类药物应用专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 257-272.
[4] 陆闻青, 陈昕怡, 任雪飞. 遗传代谢病儿童肝移植受者术后生活质量调查研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 287-292.
[5] 范铁艳, 李君, 陈虹. 肝移植术后新发戊型病毒性肝炎的诊治经验[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 293-296.
[6] 陈朔, 陈峰, 程飞, 项捷. 糖原累积病Ⅰ型并发胰腺炎肝移植术后胰腺梗死一例[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 300-302.
[7] 汤鹏昊, 张武. 肠道微生态与肝移植围手术期并发症相关研究进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 303-307.
[8] 祝丽娜, 杨子祯, 张迪, 张勇, 蔡金贞, 王建红. 超声造影在肝移植术后肝动脉并发症中的应用价值[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 240-245.
[9] 中国器官移植发展基金会器官移植受者健康管理专家委员会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 国家肝脏移植质控中心. 肝移植受者雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂临床应用中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 193-204.
[10] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[11] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[12] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[13] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[14] 王孟龙. 肿瘤生物学特征在肝癌肝移植治疗中的意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 490-494.
[15] 王晓东, 汪恺, 葛昭, 丁忠祥, 徐骁. 计算机视觉技术在肝癌肝移植疗效提升中的研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 361-366.
阅读次数
全文


摘要