切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 343 -348. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2020.06.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

器官捐献时代再次肝移植单中心回顾性研究
邢皓1, 陶一峰1, 徐琳琳1, 金嫣婷1, 李建华1, 张全保1, 沈丛欢1, 马震宇1, 李瑞东1, 王正昕1,()   
  1. 1. 200040 上海,复旦大学附属华山医院普外科 复旦大学器官移植研究所
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-15 出版日期:2020-12-25
  • 通信作者: 王正昕
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81873874)

Single-center retrospective analysis of liver retransplantation in the era of organ donation

Hao Xing1, Yifeng Tao1, Linlin Xu1, Yanting Jin1, Jianhua Li1, Quanbao Zhang1, Conghuan Shen1, Zhenyu Ma1, Ruidong Li1, Zhengxin Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Liver Transplantation Center, Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
  • Received:2020-08-15 Published:2020-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Zhengxin Wang
引用本文:

邢皓, 陶一峰, 徐琳琳, 金嫣婷, 李建华, 张全保, 沈丛欢, 马震宇, 李瑞东, 王正昕. 器官捐献时代再次肝移植单中心回顾性研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 343-348.

Hao Xing, Yifeng Tao, Linlin Xu, Yanting Jin, Jianhua Li, Quanbao Zhang, Conghuan Shen, Zhenyu Ma, Ruidong Li, Zhengxin Wang. Single-center retrospective analysis of liver retransplantation in the era of organ donation[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(06): 343-348.

目的

总结再次肝移植的病因、预后及并发症防治。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年12月复旦大学附属华山医院完成的26例再次肝移植供、受者临床资料。根据再次肝移植时间不同,将2015年1月至2017年12月(代表公民逝世后器官捐献时代早期再次肝移植治疗经验探索期)完成的再次肝移植受者纳入早期移植组(共9例),将2018年1月至2019年12月完成的再次肝移植受者纳入成熟期移植组(共17例)。根据移植间隔时间不同,将26例受者分为移植间隔>1年组(15例)和移植间隔≤1年组(11例)。采用两独立样本t检验比较早期与成熟期移植组受者再次肝移植术前年龄、终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分、手术时长、供肝冷和热缺血时间、无肝期时长及术后第7、14天血清白蛋白水平。采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较两组受者移植间隔时长、术中出血量和输血量以及术后第7、14天总胆红素、ALT和AST。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算再移植术后受者生存率并绘制生存曲线,采用Log-rank检验比较早期与成熟期移植组、移植间隔>1年与≤1年组受者术后2年生存率。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

再次肝移植病因包括:胆道并发症8例,移植物失功8例,原发病复发4例(肝细胞肝癌复发),慢性排斥反应2例,首次肝移植术后急性肝功能衰竭2例,血管并发症2例(门静脉血栓和肝动脉栓塞各1例)。早期移植组受者术中无肝期时长和术后第7天血清白蛋白分别为(53.3±7.9)min和(34±5)g/L,成熟期移植组受者分别为(45.1±1.8)min和(38±4)g/L,差异均有统计学意义(t=3.098和-2.111,P均<0.05)。早期移植组肝移植术前年龄、MELD评分、移植间隔时长、手术时间、术中出血量、术中输血量、供肝冷和热缺血时间、术后第7天总胆红素、ALT和AST以及术后第14天总胆红素、ALT、AST和白蛋白差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。随访至2020年10月1日,26例受者中位随访时间为715 d(105~1 842 d),期间9例受者均于术后1年内死亡(早期移植组6例,成熟期移植组3例)。早期移植组和成熟期移植组受者术后2年累积生存率分别为33.3%和82.4%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.248,P<0.05)。移植间隔≤1年组和移植间隔>1年组受者术后2年累积生存率分别为54.5%和73.3%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.990,P>0.05)。

结论

胆道并发症及移植物失功能是再次肝移植的主要原因,器官捐献成熟时期的再次肝移植预后优于器官捐献时代早期。因再移植受者病情复杂、手术困难,应谨慎进行再次肝移植手术评估。合理的个体化治疗能够为再次肝移植受者带来良好预后。

Objective

To analyze the causes, complications and prognosis of liver retransplantation.

Methods

The clinical data of 26 liver retransplantation recipients and donors from Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among 26 cases, 9 cases were in the early period of organ donation group (January 2015 to December 2017), and 17 cases were in the developed period of organ donation group (January 2018 to December 2019). According to different transplantation intervals, 26 recipients were divided into transplantation interval >1 year group (15 cases) and transplantation interval ≤1 year group (11 cases). Two independent sample t-tests was used to compare the preoperative age, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores, operation duration, warm and cold ischemia time, time of anthepatic phase, and serum albumin levels on the 7th and 14th day after liver transplantation between the early period of organ donation and developed period of organ donation group. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the transplantation interval, intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion, and total bilirubin, ALT and AST on the 7th and 14th day after liver transplantation between the early period of organ donation and developed period of organ donation group. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival rate of the recipients after liver retransplantation and to draw the survival curve. The Log-rank test was used to compare the 2 years survival rate of the early period between organ donation and developed period of organ donation group, and the transplantation interval >1 year and ≤1 year group. P<0.05 indicates that the difference is statistically significant.

Results

The causes of retransplantation included: 8 cases of biliary complications, 8 cases of graft failure, 4 cases of primary recurrence (recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma), 2 cases of chronic rejection, and 2 cases of acute liver failure after the first liver transplantation, 2 cases of vascular complications (1 case each for portal vein thrombosis and 1 case for hepatic artery embolism). The time of anthepatic phase and serum albumin level of recipients on the 7th day after liver transplantation in the early period between organ donation and developed period of organ donation group were (53.3±7.9) and (45.1±1.8) min, (34±5) and (38±4) g/L, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (t=3.098 and -2.111, all P<0.05 ). There were no statistically significant differences between the early period of organ donation and developed period of organ donation group for the age before liver retransplantation, MELD scores, the transplantation interval, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, warm and cold ischemia time, and total bilirubin, ALT and AST on the 7th and 14th day after retransplantation (all P>0.05). The recipients were followed until October 1, 2020, the median follow-up time was 715 d (105-1 842 d), during which 9 recipients died within 1 year after surgery (6 in the early period of organ donation group, 3 cases in the developed period of organ donation group). The 2- year cumulative survival rate of recipients in the early period between organ donation and developed period of organ donation group were 33.3% and 82.4%, which was statistically significant (χ2=6.248, P<0.05). The cumulative survival rates of recipients in the transplantation interval ≤1 year and transplantation interval >1 year were 54.5% and 73.3%, which had no significant difference (χ2=0.990, P>0.05).

Conclusions

Biliary complications and graft failure are the main reasons for retransplantation. The prognosis of retransplantation in the developed period of organ donation is better than that in the early period of organ donation. Given the complicated condition of the retransplant recipient and the difficulty of the operation, the evaluation of the retransplantation operation should be carried out carefully. Reasonable individualized treatment can bring a good prognosis for retransplantation recipients.

表1 早期与成熟期移植组受者再次肝移植术前、术中及术后一般情况比较
图1 早期移植组和成熟期移植组受者再次肝移植术后生存曲线
图2 移植间隔≤1年和移植间隔>1年组受者再次肝移植术后生存曲线
1
Toniutto P, Zanetto A, Ferrarese A, et al. Current challenges and future directions for liver transplantation[J]. Liver Int, 2017, 37(3): 317-327.
2
Kitchens WH, Yeh H, Markmann JF. Hepatic retransplant: what have we learned?[J]. Clin Liver Dis, 2014,18(3): 731-751.
3
Rana A, Petrowsky H, Kaplan B, et al. Early liver retransplantation in adults[J]. Transpl Int, 2014, 27(2): 141-151.
4
李瑞东,应悦,裴家好,等. 公民逝世后器官捐献供肝微生物学培养阳性对肝移植术后恢复及预后的影响[J/CD]. 实用器官移植电子杂志,2020,8(4): 282-285.
5
Berumen J, Hemming A. Liver retransplantation: how much is too much?[J]. Clin Liver Dis, 017, 21(2): 435-447.
6
刘钦钦,李波,魏永刚,等. 肝脏再移植原因及效果分析[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版,2019, 13(2): 123-126.
7
Verdonk RC, Buis CI. Nonanastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation, part 2: management, outcome, and risk factors for disease progression[J]. Liver Transpl, 2007, 13(5): 725-732.
8
Enestvedt CK, Malik S, Reese PP, et al. Biliary complications adversely affect patient and graft survival after liver retransplantation[J]. Liver Transpl, 2013, 19(9): 965-972.
9
Hessheimer AJ, Cardenas A, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, et al. Can we prevent ischemic-type biliary lesions in donation after circulatorydetermination of death liver transplantation?[J]. Liver Transpl, 2016, 22(7): 1025-1033.
10
王正昕,钦伦秀. 肝移植术后并发症的防治现状及进展[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志,2018, 25(9): 1025-1030.
11
Allen AM, Kim WR, Xiong H, et al. Survival of recipients of livers from donation after circulatory death who arerelisted and undergo retransplant for graft failure[J]. Am J Transplant, 2014, 14(5): 1120-1128.
12
Kok B, Dong V, Karvellas CJ. Graft dysfunction and management in liver transplantation[J]. Crit Care Clin, 2019, 35(1): 117-133.
13
Zhou J, Chen J, Wei Q, et al. The role of ischemia-reperfusion injury in early hepatic allograft dysfunction[J]. Liver Transpl, 2020, 26(8): 1034-1048.
14
Bastos-Neves D, Salvalaggio PRO, Almeida MD. Risk factors, surgical complications and graft survival in liver transplantrecipients with early allograft dysfunction[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2019, 18(5): 423-429.
15
Chen X, Xu M. Primary graft dysfunction after liver transplantation[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2014, 13(2): 125-137.
16
Avolio AW, Franco A, Schlegel A. Development and validation of a comprehensive model to estimate early allograft failure among patients requiring early liver retransplant[J]. JAMA, 2020, 155(12): e204095.
17
Schielke A, Scatton O. Ischemic-type biliary lesions: A leading indication of liver retransplantation with excellent results[J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 2019, 43(2): 131-139.
18
Ijtsma AJ, van der Hilst CS, de Boer MT. The clinical relevance of the anhepatic phase during liver transplantation[J]. Liver Transpl, 2009, 15(9): 1050-1055.
19
Ma T, Li QS, Wang Y. Value of pretransplant albumin-bilirubin score in predicting outcomes after liver transplantation[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2019, 25(15): 1879-1889.
20
Petrowsky H, Kaplan B. Early liver retransplantation in adults[J]. Transpl Int, 2014, 27(2): 141-151.
21
Mathur AK, Talwalkar J. Quality measurement and improvement in liver transplantation[J]. J Hepatol, 2018, 68(6): 1300-1310.
22
贺英杰,温培豪,张嘉凯,等. 肝移植术后早期门静脉并发症的危险因素分析及诊治经验[J]. 中华器官移植杂志,2019, 40(11): 660-661.
23
Stine JG, Pelletier SJ. Pre-transplant portal vein thrombosis is an independent risk factor for graft loss due to hepatic artery thrombosis in liver transplant recipients[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2016, 18(3): 279-286.
24
石炳毅,刘志佳. 构建质量提升计划系统,促进器官移植转型发展[J]. 器官移植,2020, 11(1): 1-7.
[1] 李培杰, 乔永杰, 张浩强, 曾健康, 谭飞, 李嘉欢, 王静, 周胜虎. 细菌培养阴性的假体周围感染诊治的最新进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 827-833.
[2] 涂家金, 廖武强, 刘金晶, 涂志鹏, 毛远桂. 严重烧伤患者鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 491-497.
[3] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[4] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[5] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[6] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[7] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[8] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[9] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[10] 赵立力, 王魁向, 张小冲, 李志远. 血沉与C-反应蛋白比值在假体周围感染中的诊断价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 351-355.
[11] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[12] 卓徐鹏, 刘颖, 任菁菁. 感染性疾病与老年人低蛋白血症的相关性研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 896-899.
[13] 李静静, 翟蕾, 赵海平, 郑波. 多囊肾合并囊肿的多重耐药菌感染一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 920-923.
[14] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
[15] 杨艳丽, 陈昱, 赵若辰, 杜伟, 马海娟, 许珂, 张莉芸. 系统性红斑狼疮合并血流感染的危险因素及细菌学分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 694-699.
阅读次数
全文


摘要