切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 337 -342. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2020.06.001

所属专题: 文献

论著

YTHDF1单核苷酸多态性在符合杭州标准肝移植受者术后肝癌复发中的预测价值
李强强1, 余晓波2, 周琳1, 李鸿3, 翟政龙3, 郑树森1,()   
  1. 1. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院肝胆胰外科;310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院卫生部多器官联合移植研究重点实验室
    2. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院卫生部多器官联合移植研究重点实验室
    3. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院肝胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-20 出版日期:2020-12-25
  • 通信作者: 郑树森
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金创新群体(81721091); 传染病重大专项(2017ZX10203205); 浙江省卫健委项目(JBZX-202004)

Predictive value of YTHDF1 single nucleotide polymorphism in the hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence of liver transplant recipients within the Hangzhou criteria

Qiangqiang Li1, Xiaobo Yu2, Lin Zhou1, Hong Li3, Zhenglong Zhai3, Shusen Zheng1,()   

  1. 1. Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
    2. NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
    3. Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
  • Received:2020-10-20 Published:2020-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Shusen Zheng
引用本文:

李强强, 余晓波, 周琳, 李鸿, 翟政龙, 郑树森. YTHDF1单核苷酸多态性在符合杭州标准肝移植受者术后肝癌复发中的预测价值[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 337-342.

Qiangqiang Li, Xiaobo Yu, Lin Zhou, Hong Li, Zhenglong Zhai, Shusen Zheng. Predictive value of YTHDF1 single nucleotide polymorphism in the hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence of liver transplant recipients within the Hangzhou criteria[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(06): 337-342.

目的

探讨YTHDF1单核苷酸多态性(SNP)在符合杭州标准肝移植受者术后肝癌复发中的预测价值。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月1日至2019年5月31日在浙江大学医学院附属第一医院接受肝癌肝移植并符合杭州标准的139例受者临床资料,中位年龄54岁(30~73岁),其中男性120例,女性19例。在1 000 Genmoes Project数据库中,设定人群为汉族、最小等位基因频率>5%及r2>0.8,利用Haploview软件筛选出标签单核苷酸多态性(tagSNP)。采用配对样本Wilcoxon检验比较YTHDF1在肝癌及癌旁组织中的表达差异,采用Kaplan-Meier方法绘制rs68041888 G携带型和非携带型肝癌肝移植受者术后无复发生存曲线并比较无复发生存时间,采用Cox比例风险回归模型进行肝癌肝移植术后肿瘤复发影响因素分析,采用卡方检验或Fisher确切概率法比较肿瘤复发与未复发组受者YTHDF1 tagSNP基因型分布。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

随访至2020年5月31日,139例肝癌肝移植受者平均无复发生存时间为(43.9±2.0)个月(1~56个月),其中28例肝癌复发。YTHDF1在肝癌组织中的表达水平高于癌旁组织,评分中位数分别为6分(4~9分)和3分(1~6分),差异有统计学意义(Z=4.087,P<0.05)。28例复发组受者rs68041888位点的G/A型、G/G型和A/A型分别为8、13和7例,111例未复发组受者中则分别为42、61和8例,两组基因型分布差异有统计学意义(χ2=0.025,P<0.05)。其余tagSNP基因型分布差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。rs68041888 G非携带型(位点为A/A型)受者肝癌复发比例高于携带型(位点为G/A型、G/G型),分别为46.7%(7/15)和16.9%(21/124),差异有统计学意义(P=0.018)。rs68041888 G携带型与非携带型受者术后1年无复发生存比例分别为87.1%(108/124)和66.7%(10/15),无复发生存时间分别为(45.6±2.1)和(27.9±5.2)个月,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.980,P=0.014)。复发组术前AFP≤400 μg/L和rs68041888 G携带型受者比例分别为71.4%(20/28)、75.0%(21/28),均低于未复发组受者[91.0%(101/111)、92.8(103/111)],差异均有统计学意义(χ2=5.955和5.621,P均<0.05) 。其余指标差异均无统计学有意义(P均>0.05)。将单因素分析中P<0.10的变量纳入Cox比例风险回归模型进行多因素分析。结果显示,术前AFP、肿瘤数量、组织学分级和rs68041888 G携带与否与肿瘤复发有关(RR=5.024、2.352、2.523和3.693,P均<0.05)。

结论

在符合杭州标准的肝癌肝移植受者中,rs68041888 G非携带型受者肿瘤复发风险较高。rs68041888基因型对肝移植术后肝癌复发的预测具有潜在价值。

Objective

To investigate the predictive value of YTHDF1 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence of liver transplant recipients within Hangzhou criteria.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 139 recipients who received liver transplantation from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University and met Hangzhou criteria from January 1, 2015 to May 31, 2019, with a median age of 54 years (30-73 years), including 120 males and 19 females. The tag SNPs (Han population, minor allele frequency>5% and r2>0.8) were obtained from 1 000 Genmoes Project database with Haploview. Paired-sample Wilcoxon test was used to compare the expression differences of YTHDF1 in liver cancer and adjacent tissues. Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw recurrence-free survival curves of rs68041888 G-carrying and non-carrying liver recipients and to compare recurrence-free survival time. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze the factors affecting tumor recurrence after liver transplantation. The Chi-square test or Fisher′s exact probability method was used to compare the YTHDF1 tagSNP genotype distribution of the tumor recurrence and non-recurrence groups. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Follow-up to May 31, 2020, the average recurrence-free survival time of 139 liver transplant recipients was (43.9±2.0) months (1 to 56 months). Among 139 liver recipients, 28 had recurrence. The expression level of YTHDF1 in liver cancer tissues is higher than that in adjacent tissues (6 points vs. 3 points, Z=4.087, P<0.05). There were 8, 13 and 7 cases of G/A, G/G and A/A at rs68041888 locus among 28 recipients in recurrence group, respectively. Among the 111 recipients in the non-recurrence group, they were 42, 61, and 8, respectively. The difference in genotype distribution between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2=0.025, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of other tagSNP genotypes (all P>0.05). rs68041888 G non-carrying type (locus type A/A) recipients of liver cancer recurrence rate (46.7%, 7/15) is higher than that of carrier type (locating type G/A, G/G type) (16.9%, 21/124) (P=0.018). The 1-year recurrence-free survival rates of rs68041888 G-carrying and non-carrying recipients were 87.1% (108/124) and 66.7% (10/15), respectively, and the recurrence-free survival time was (45.6±2.1) and (27.9±5.2) months (χ2=5.980, P=0.014). The proportions of recipients with preoperative AFP≤400 μg/L and rs68041888 G-carrying type in the recurrence group were 71.4% (20/28) and 75.0% (21/28), respectively, which were lower than those in the non-recurrence group [91.0% (101/111), 92.8% (103/111)] (χ2=5.955 and 5.621, both P<0.05). The differences in other indicators were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The variables with P<0.10 in the univariate analysis were incorporated into the Cox proportional hazards regression model for multivariate analysis. The results showed that preoperative AFP, tumor number, histological grade and rs68041888 G carrying or not were related to tumor recurrence (RR=5.024, 2.352, 2.523, 3.693, P all<0.05).

Conclusions

The liver recipients who met Hangzhou criteria without rs68041888 G type have a higher risk of recurrence. The rs68041888 genotype has potential value in predicting the recurrence of HCC after liver transplantation.

表1 肝癌肝移植术后肿瘤复发与未复发组受者YTHDF1tagSNP基因型分布[例(%)]
图1 rs68041888 G携带型和非携带型肝癌肝移植受者术后无复发生存曲线
表2 肝癌肝移植术后肿瘤复发影响因素单因素分析结果[例(%)]
表3 肝癌肝移植术后肿瘤复发影响因素Cox比例风险回归模型分析结果
1
胡诗航,王孟龙. 原发性肝癌单个肿瘤不同治疗方法的效果比较[J]. 北京医学,2016, 38(4): 289-292.
2
曾凯宁,姜楠. 肝癌肝移植适应证标准的发展及展望[J]. 器官移植,2014, (3): 152-155.
3
秦蒙华,史冀华,郭文治,等. 肝移植术后远期并发症及其防治[J]. 中华器官移植杂志,2018, 39(11): 694-697.
4
中华医学会器官移植学分会,中华医学会外科学分会移植学组,中国医师协会器官移植医师分会. 中国肝癌肝移植临床实践指南[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版,2014, 8(2): 61-65.
5
Zhou Y, Yin Z, Hou B, et al. Expression profiles and prognostic significance of RNA N6-methyladenosine-related genes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: evidence from independent datasets[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2019, 11: 3921-3931.
6
Lin X, Chai G, Wu Y, et al. RNA m(6)A methylation regulates the epithelial mesenchymal transition of cancer cells and translation of Snail[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1): 2065.
7
Zhao X, Chen Y, Mao Q, et al. Overexpression of YTHDF1 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer Biomark, 2018, 21(4): 859-868.
8
郭粉粉. CD147功能性SNP与原发性肝癌易感性的相关性分析及其生物学效应的研究[D]. 南宁:广西医科大学,2018.
9
Smith AJ, Humphries SE. Cytokine and cytokine receptor gene polymorphisms and their functionality[J]. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, 2009, 20(1): 43-59.
10
Cai J, Cai Y, Ma Q, et al. Association of p53 codon 72 polymorphism with susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma in a Chinese population from northeast Sichuan[J]. Biomed Rep, 2017, 6(2): 217-222.
11
Bayram S. RASSF1A Ala133Ser polymorphism is associated with increased susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma in a Turkish population[J]. Gene, 2012, 498(2): 264-269.
12
马凯,任雷,滕木俭. 基因单核苷酸多态性与肝癌肝移植术后复发的研究进展[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展,2014, 17(4): 302-305.
13
Bai Y, Yang C, Wu R, et al. YTHDF1 regulates tumorigenicity and cancer stem cell-like activity in human colorectal carcinoma[J]. Front Oncol, 2019, 9: 332.
14
Liu S, Li G, Li Q, et al. The roles and mechanisms of YTH domain-containing proteins in cancer development and progression[J]. Am J Cancer Res, 2020, 10(4): 1068-1084.
15
Andrade Fde O, De Assis S, Jin L, et al. Lipidomic fatty acid profile and global gene expression pattern in mammary gland of rats that were exposed to lard-based high fat diet during fetal and lactation periods associated to breast cancer risk in adulthood[J]. Chem Biol Interact, 2015, 239: 118-28.
16
Liu L, Liu X, Dong Z, et al. N6-methyladenosine-related genomic targets are altered in breast cancer tissue and associated with poor survival[J]. J Cancer, 2019, 10(22): 5447-5459.
17
Adhikari S, Xiao W, Zhao YL, et al. m(6)A: Signaling for mRNA splicing[J]. RNA Biol, 2016, 13(9): 756-759.
18
Tian J, Ying P, Ke J, et al. ANKLE1 N(6) -Methyladenosine-related variant is associated with colorectal cancer risk by maintaining the genomic stability[J], 2020, 146(12): 3281-3293.
19
Liu T, Li C, Jin L, et al. The prognostic value of m6A RNA methylation regulators in colon adenocarcinoma[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2019, 25: 9435-9445.
20
Burbage M, Gros M, Amigorena S. Translate less, prime better, to improve anti-tumor responses[J]. Nat Immunol, 2019, 20(5): 518-520.
21
Kim DJ, Iwasaki A. YTHDF1 control of dendritic cell cross-priming as a possible target of cancer immunotherapy[J], 2019, 58(15): 1945-1946.
22
Han D, Liu J, Chen C, et al. Anti-tumour immunity controlled through mRNA m(6)A methylation and YTHDF1 in dendritic cells[J]. Nature, 2019, 566(7743): 270-274.
23
Yang Z, Li J, Feng G, et al. MicroRNA-145 modulates N(6)-methyladenosine levels by targeting the 3′-Untranslated mRNA region of the N(6)-methyladenosine binding YTH domain family 2 protein[J]. J Biol Chem, 2017, 292(9): 3614-3623.
[1] 李淼, 朱连华, 韩鹏, 姜波, 费翔. 高帧频超声造影评价肝细胞癌血管形态与风险因素的研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 911-915.
[2] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[3] 董杰, 杨松, 杨浩, 陈翔, 张万里. 乙酰辅酶A羧化酶2基因高甲基化与肝细胞癌临床病理因素和生存期的关系[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 433-437.
[4] 黄威, 刘启, 陈流华, 滕茶香, 区喆建, 刘韩笑, 陈健聪, 张昆松. 新定义的可预测肝癌预后的焦亡相关lncRNA模型[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 357-365.
[5] 李坤河, 寇萌佳, 邝立挺. 肝移植术后二次气管插管的危险因素及预测模型的建立[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 366-371.
[6] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 上海医药行业协会. 中国肝、肾移植受者霉酚酸类药物应用专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 257-272.
[7] 陆闻青, 陈昕怡, 任雪飞. 遗传代谢病儿童肝移植受者术后生活质量调查研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 287-292.
[8] 范铁艳, 李君, 陈虹. 肝移植术后新发戊型病毒性肝炎的诊治经验[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 293-296.
[9] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[10] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[11] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[12] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[13] 王孟龙. 肿瘤生物学特征在肝癌肝移植治疗中的意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 490-494.
[14] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[15] 吴凤芸, 滕鑫, 刘连娟. 高帧频超声造影与增强磁共振对不同直径原发性高分化肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 404-408.
阅读次数
全文


摘要