切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 270 -275. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2021.05.003

论著

心脏移植术后死亡危险因素分析
吴智勇1, 左一凡1, 王志维1,(), 阮永乐1, 任宗力1, 任伟1, 胡锐1, 余岸峰1, 石烽1   
  1. 1. 430060 武汉大学人民医院心血管外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-22 出版日期:2021-10-25
  • 通信作者: 王志维
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省自然科学基金项目(2019CFB469); 武汉大学人民医院引导基金项目(RMYD2018M22)

Analysis of death risk factors after heart transplantation

Zhiyong Wu1, Yifan Zuo1, Zhiwei Wang1,(), Yongle Ruan1, Zongli Ren1, wei Ren1, Rui Hu1, Anfeng Yu1, Feng Shi1   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
  • Received:2021-02-22 Published:2021-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Zhiwei Wang
引用本文:

吴智勇, 左一凡, 王志维, 阮永乐, 任宗力, 任伟, 胡锐, 余岸峰, 石烽. 心脏移植术后死亡危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 270-275.

Zhiyong Wu, Yifan Zuo, Zhiwei Wang, Yongle Ruan, Zongli Ren, wei Ren, Rui Hu, Anfeng Yu, Feng Shi. Analysis of death risk factors after heart transplantation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(05): 270-275.

目的

回顾性分析单中心7例心脏移植术后死亡的受者资料,探讨心脏移植术后死亡危险因素。

方法

2015年5月1日至2019年5月1日武汉大学人民医院心血管外科共实施74例原位心脏移植,术式均采用双腔静脉法。截至2020年4月,中位随访时间724 d,65例受者存活,9例死亡。排除2例非医疗原因死亡病例,将受者分为存活组(65例)和死亡组(7例)。收集两组受者术前、术中和围手术期指标以及对应供者情况。对符合正态分布的连续变量采用t检验比较,非正态分布的连续变量采用Kruskal-Wallis检验。计数资料采用Fisher确切概率法比较。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线。采用Cox比例风险模型分析心脏移植术后死亡危险因素。

结果

7例死亡受者中,4例受者住院期间因移植心脏衰竭、排斥反应、呼吸衰竭及其他脏器功能衰竭死亡,其中1例为心肺联合移植受者;3例受者随访期间死亡,死因分别为服用免疫抑制剂依从性差2例,移植心脏衰竭、排斥反应和肝功能衰竭1例。死亡组和存活组受者手术时年龄、体质指数、左室射血分数、原发病以及术前接受心肺复苏、血管活性药物维持和ECMO过渡等基线情况差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。死亡组和存活组对应供者年龄、体质量差、供心冷缺血时间、脑死亡原因构成、供/受者性别和ABO血型匹配以及边缘供心比例差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05),死亡组供/受者年龄差过大(>17岁)的比例高于存活组(P<0.05)。死亡组和存活组受者体外循环时间中位数分别为201(185,226)和170(152,197)min,术中浓缩红细胞用量分别为8.0(5.5,9.0)和4.0(2.0,6.0)U,血小板用量分别为4.0(2.0,6.0)和2.0(2.0,2.0) U,差异均有统计学意义(Z=4.494、5.305和7.418,P均<0.05)。死亡组受者ICU停留时间和术后呼吸机使用时间长于存活组,分别为11.1(5.9,17.7)和3.8(2.9-5.0)d,58(12,172)和8(6,15) h(Z=14.817和7.335,P均<0.05);同时,死亡组长时间停留ICU(停留时间>5 d)和长时间使用呼吸机(使用时间>24 h)的受者比例高于存活组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。74例受者总体1、3和5年生存率分别为91.9%、84.7%和74.1%。将两组受者术前和术中指标以及对应供者指标差异有统计学意义的因素纳入Cox比例风险模型分析,结果显示术中血小板用量是心脏移植术后死亡的独立危险因素,术中使用血小板每增加1 U,术后死亡风险增加1.35倍(HR=2.35,95% CI 1.28~4.32,P<0.05)。

结论

心脏移植术后结局受多种因素影响,术中红细胞和血小板用量及供/受体年龄差过大是心脏移植术后死亡的危险因素。

Objective

A retrospective analysis of 7 patients who died after heart transplantation in a single center, and to explore the risk factors for death after heart transplantation.

Methods

From May 1, 2015 to May 1, 2019, 74 cases of orthotopic heart transplantation were performed in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. By April 2020, with a follow-up time of 724 days, 65 recipients survived and 9 died. Two cases of death due to non-medical causes were excluded, and the recipients were divided into survival group (65 cases) and death group (7 cases). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters and corresponding donor conditions were collected for the survival group. Continuous variables that met the normal distribution were compared using the t-test, and continuous variables that were not normally distributed were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Enumeration data were compared using Fisher′s exact test. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze risk factors for death after heart transplantation.

Results

Of the 7 dead recipients, 4 died of transplant heart failure, rejection, respiratory failure and other organ failure during hospitalization, including 1 recipient of combined heart-lung transplantation and 3 recipients who died during follow-up: 2 cases with poor compliance with immunosuppressive agents, 1 case with transplant heart failure, rejection and liver failure. There were no significant differences in age at operation, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, primary disease, preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation, vasoactive drug maintenance and ECMO transition between the surviving recipients (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in donor age, poor body weight, donor cold ischemia time, cause of brain death, donor/recipient sex and ABO blood group matching, and marginal donor ratio in the death and survival groups (P>0.05), and the proportion of donor/recipient age difference (>17 years) in the death group was higher than that in the survival group (P<0.05). The median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 201 (185, 226) and 170 (152, 197) min, the intraoperative packed red blood cell dosage was 8.0 (5.5, 9.0) and 4.0 (2.0, 6.0) U, and the platelet dosage was 4.0 (2.0, 6.0) and 2.0 (2.0, 2.0) U in the surviving recipients, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The ICU stay and postoperative ventilator use time of recipients in the death group were longer than those in the survival group, 11.1 (5.9, 17.7) and 3.8 (2.9-5.0) d, 58 (12, 172) and 8 (6, 15) h, respectively; meanwhile, the proportion of recipients who stayed in the ICU (stay >5 d) and used the ventilator for a long time (use > 24 h) in the death group was higher than that in the survival group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05 for all). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of the 74 recipients were 91.9%, 84.7%, and 74.1%, respectively. The factors with statistically significant differences in preoperative and intraoperative indicators and corresponding donor indicators between the two groups were included in Cox proportional hazards model analysis. The results showed that intraoperative platelet dosage was an independent risk factor for death after heart transplantation. For every U increase in intraoperative platelet use, the risk of postoperative death increased by 1.35 times (HR=2.35, 95% CI 1.28~4.32, P<0.05).

Conclusions

The outcome after heart transplantation is influenced by many factors. Excessive differences in intraoperative red blood cell and platelet dosage and donor/recipient age are risk factors for death after heart transplantation.

表1 4例联合移植和1例合并主动脉全弓置换的心脏移植受者随访情况
表2 心脏移植术后存活和死亡受者术前情况(例)
表3 心脏移植术后存活和死亡受者对应供者情况(例)
表4 心脏移植术后存活和死亡受者围手术期情况(例)
表5 心脏移植受者术后死亡危险因素Cox比例风险模型分析
图1 74例心脏移植受者生存曲线
1
Hu XJ, Dong NG, Liu JP, et al. Status on heart transplantation in China[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2015128 (23): 3238-3242.
2
胡盛寿. 中国心脏移植现状[J]. 中华器官移植杂志201738(8):449-454.
3
王怡轩,谢飞,蔡杰,等. 单中心回顾性研究心脏移植的边缘供心应用[J]. 中国循环杂志201732(z1):121-122.
4
Baran DA, Copeland H, Copeland J. What number are we?[J]. Circ Heart Fail, 201912 (5): e005823.
5
Lund LH, Edwards LB, Dipchand AI, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-third Adult Heart Transplantation Report-2016; Focus Theme: Primary Diagnostic Indications for Transplant[J]. J Heart Lung Transplant, 201635(10): 1158-1169.
6
Bhagra SK, Pettit S, Parameshwar J. Cardiac transplantation: indications, eligibility and current outcomes[J]. Heart, 2019105(3): 252-260.
7
Singh SSA, Dalzell JR, Berry C, et al. Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplantation: a thorn amongst the roses[J]. Heart Fail Rev, 201924(5): 805-820.
8
Mojcik CF, Levy JH. Aprotinin and the systemic inflammatory response after cardiopulmonary bypass[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 200171(2):745-754.
9
Besser MW, Klein AA. The coagulopathy of cardiopulmonary bypass[J]. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci, 201047(5-6):197-212.
10
Griffin BR, Bronsert M, Reece TB, et al. Thrombocytopenia after cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with increased morbidity and mortality[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2020110(1): 50-57.
11
Di Dedda U, Ranucci M, Porta A, et al. The combined effects of the microcirculatory status and cardiopulmonary bypass on platelet count and function during cardiac surgery[J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 201870(3): 327-337.
12
Ho LTS, Lenihan M, McVey MJ, et al. The association between platelet dysfunction and adverse outcomes in cardiac surgical patients[J]. Anaesthesia, 201974(9): 1130-1137.
13
Shams Hakimi C, Singh S, Hesse C, et al. Effects of fibrinogen and platelet transfusion on coagulation and platelet function in bleeding cardiac surgery patients[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 201963(4): 475-482.
14
Stehlik J, Kobashigawa J, Hunt SA, et al. Honoring 50 years of clinical heart transplantation in Circulation: In-Depth State-of-the-Art Review[J]. Circulation, 2018137(1): 71-87.
15
López-Sainz Á, Barge-Caballero E, Barge-Caballero G, et al. Late graft failure in heart transplant recipients: incidence, risk factors and clinical outcomes[J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 201820(2): 385-394.
16
Mehra MR, Canter CE, Hannan MM, et al. The 2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation listing criteria for heart transplantation: A 10-year update[J]. J Heart Lung Transplant, 201635(1): 1-23.
17
吴智勇,王志维,任宗力,等. 边缘供心临床应用的单中心效果分析[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志2020, 36(4): 222-226.
[1] 周容, 张亚萍, 廖宇, 程晓萍, 管玉龙, 潘广玉, 闫杰, 王贤芝, 苟中山, 潘登科, 李巅远. 超声在基因编辑猪-猴异种并联式心脏移植术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 617-623.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[8] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[9] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[10] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[11] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[12] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[13] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[14] 丁洪基, 赵长江, 孙鹏飞, 王灿, 王贵珍, 李龙龙. 细胞焦亡与疾病的关系研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 682-686.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?