切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 276 -281. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2021.05.004

论著

胰岛素目标血糖管理对脑死亡器官捐献供肾炎症反应及移植肾预后的影响
王连政1, 张玮晔2, 李磊磊1, 窦晓婧2,()   
  1. 1. 014017 包头,内蒙古包钢医院泌尿外科
    2. 300192 天津市第一中心医院重症二科
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-23 出版日期:2021-10-25
  • 通信作者: 窦晓婧

Effect of target blood glucose control with insulin therapy on donor kidney inflammatory response and prognosis of transplanted kidney from donation after brain death

Lianzheng Wang1, Weiye Zhang2, Leilei Li1, Xiaojing Dou2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Urinary Surgery, Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital, Baotou 014017, China
    2. Second Department of Intensive Medicine, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
  • Received:2021-02-23 Published:2021-10-25
  • Corresponding author: Xiaojing Dou
引用本文:

王连政, 张玮晔, 李磊磊, 窦晓婧. 胰岛素目标血糖管理对脑死亡器官捐献供肾炎症反应及移植肾预后的影响[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 276-281.

Lianzheng Wang, Weiye Zhang, Leilei Li, Xiaojing Dou. Effect of target blood glucose control with insulin therapy on donor kidney inflammatory response and prognosis of transplanted kidney from donation after brain death[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(05): 276-281.

目的

探讨胰岛素目标血糖管理对脑死亡器官捐献供肾炎症反应及移植肾预后的影响。

方法

选取内蒙古包钢医院器官获取组织于2015年7月至2020年7月维护的脑死亡供者50例,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和强化组,每组各25例。所有供者确诊脑死亡后且评估为潜在捐献者时开始进行维护,常规组和强化组24 h平均血糖控制目标范围分别为4.4~10.0 mmol/L和4.4~6.1 mmol/L。记录两组供者开始维护时及器官获取时平均动脉压(MAP)、血管活性药物评分(VIS)、中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)、血清乳酸和尿量等血流动力学和组织灌注相关参数,血清肌酐、中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白(NGAL)和胱抑素C等肾损伤指标,以及炎症因子IL-1β、IL-6、IL-18和TNF-α浓度变化。观察两组供者供肾移植受者住院时间、移植肾原发性无功能(PNF)和移植肾功能延迟恢复(DGF)发生情况,以及术后3、6和12个月估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和移植肾1年存活率。

结果

两组供者性别、年龄、原发病、体质指数、维护时间以及开始维护时血白细胞、降钙素原和初始血糖水平差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05),维护过程中强化组胰岛素用量高于常规组[(10.5±2.0)和(6.5±2.2)U/h],维护期间血糖低于常规组[(5.0±1.2)和(8.5±2.8)mmol/L],差异均有统计学意义(t=6.727和5.745,P<0.05)。开始维护时,两组MAP、VIS、血清乳酸、ScvO2、尿量、IL-1β、IL-6、TNF-α、IL-18、血清肌酐、NGAL和胱抑素C水平差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。器官获取时,强化组VIS、IL-1β、IL-6、TNF-α、IL-18、NGAL和胱抑素C水平均低于常规组,差异均有统计学意义(t=3.71、4.29、4.18、5.41、4.41、2.43和2.05,P均<0.05)。常规组和强化组供者均分别捐献肾脏50例,均成功移植。两组受者均未发生PNF,移植肾术后1年存活率均为100%。常规组和强化组受者DGF发生率分别为30%(15/50)和12%(6/50),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.883,P<0.05)。强化组受者术后3个月eGFR优于常规组受者,差异有统计学意义(t=3.998,P<0.05);两组受者术后6和12个月eGFR差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。

结论

脑死亡器官捐献供者维护期间强化胰岛素目标血糖管理,将血糖控制于4.4~6.1 mmol/L,有助于减轻供肾炎症反应和肾损伤,降低肾移植术后DGF发生率。

Objective

This research aims to study the impacts of target blood glucose control with insulin therapy on donor kidney inflammatory response and prognosis of transplanted kidney from donation after brain death (DBD).

Methods

Fifty DBD donors maintained by organ procurement organization of Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital from July 2015 to July 2020 were selected as study subjects. The fifty donors were divide into control group (n=25) and strength group (n=25), with random number table method. Maintenance was initiated after all donors were diagnosed with brain death and assessed as potential donors, and the mean 24 h target range of glucose control was 4.4 to 10.0 mmol/L and 4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L in the control and strength groups, respectively. At the beginning of organ maintenance and donation, the parameters of hemodynamics and tissue perfusion including arterial pressure (MAP), vasoactive drug score (VIS), central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2), serum lactic acid and urine volume, and the renal injury indexes including serum creatinine, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipid carrier protein (NGAL) and Cystatin-C as well as changes in the concentration of inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18 and TNF-α were recorded. Then the hospital stay, and the primary nonfunction (PNF) and delayed graft function of transplant kidney as well as postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3, 6 and 12 months and 1-year survival rates of transplanted kidneys in the two groups were observed.

Results

There were no significant differences in sex, age, primary disease, body mass index, maintenance time, white blood cell, procalcitonin and initial blood glucose levels between the two groups (all P>0.05). Insulin dosage during maintenance in the strength group was higher than that in the control group [(10.5±2.0) and (6.5±2.2) U/h], and blood glucose during maintenance was lower than that in the control group [(5.0±1.2) and (8.5±2.8) mmol/L], which has statistical significance (t=6.727 and 5.745, all P<0.05). At the beginning of maintenance, there were no significant differences in MAP, VIS, serum lactic acid, ScvO2, urine volume, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-18, serum creatinine, NGAL and Cystatin-C levels between two groups (all P>0.05). At the time of donation, VIS, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-18, NGAL and cystatin-C levels in the strength group were significantly lower than those in the control group (t=3.71, 4.29, 4.18, 5.41, 4.41, 2.43 and 2.05, all P<0.05). Fifty donor kidneys were obtained in the control and strength groups, respectively, and all of them were successfully transplanted. No PNF occurred in both groups, and the 1-year survival rate after kidney transplantation was 100%. The incidence of DGF was 30% (15/50) in the control group and 12.0% (6/50) in the strength group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.883, P<0.05). The eGFR of the strength group was better than that of the control group 3 months after surgery, the difference was statistically significant (t=3.998, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in eGFR between the two groups at 6 and 12 months after surgery (all P>0.05).

Conclusions

During the maintenance of donors from DBD, the enhancement of target blood glucose control with insulin therapy and the control of blood glucose between 4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L can alleviate donor nephritis and kidney injury, and reduce the incidence of DGF after kidney transplantation.

表1 两组不同目标血糖管理脑死亡器官捐献供者一般资料比较
表2 两组不同目标血糖管理脑死亡器官捐献供者开始维护时及器官获取时血流动力学及组织灌注指标比较(±s)
表3 两组不同目标血糖管理脑死亡器官捐献供者开始维护及器官获取时炎症因子水平比较(pg/mL,±s)
表4 两组不同目标血糖管理脑死亡器官捐献供者开始维护时及器官获取时肾功能指标比较(±s)
表5 两组不同目标血糖管理脑死亡器官捐献供者供肾移植受者预后
1
Bugge JF. Brain death and its implications for management of the potential organ donor[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 200953(10):1239-1250.
2
王健,王晓晖,邸墅,等. 危重症患者发生应激性高血糖症的相关因素及其对患者预后的影响[J]. 临床荟萃201227(3):238-239.
3
Avlonitis VS, Wigfield CH, Kirby JA, et al. The hemodynamic mechanisms of lung injury and systemic inflammatory response following brain death in the transplant donor[J]. Am J Transplant, 20055(4 Pt 1):684-693.
4
Murugan R, Venkataraman R, Wahed AS, et al. Preload responsiveness is associated with increased interleukin-6 and lower organ yield from brain-dead donors[J]. Crit Care Med, 200937(38):2387-2393.
5
Barklin A. Systemic inflammation in the brain-dead organ donor[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 200953(4):425-435.
6
脑死亡判定标准与技术规范(成人质控版)[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版20159(1):13-17.
7
Gaies MG, Gurney JG, Yen AH, et al. Vasoactive inotropic score as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in infants after cardiopulmonary bypass[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 201011(2):234-238.
8
Stevens LA, Coresh J, Schmid CH, et al. Estimating GFR using serum systatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine: a pooled analysis of 3,418 individuals with CKD[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 200851(3):395-406.
9
张清荣,薄禄龙,邓小明. 危重病应激性代谢反应的研究进展[J]. 中华危重病急救医学201628(4):377-380.
10
van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients[J]. N Engl J Med, 2001345(19):1359-1367.
11
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2009[J]. Diabetes Care, 200932(Suppl 1):S13-S61.
12
Devarajan P. Review: neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin: a troponin-like biomarker for human acute kidney injury[J]. Nephrology (Carlton), 201015(4):419-428.
13
Srisawat N, Wen X, Lee M, et al. Urinary biomarkers and renal recovery in critically ill patients with renal support[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 20116(8):1815-1823.
14
Dandona P, Aljada A, Mohanty P, et al. Insulin inhibits intranuclear nuclear factor kappaB and stimulates IkappaB in mononuclear cells in obese subjects: evidence for an anti-inflammatory effect[J]? J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 200186(12): 3257-3265.
15
Aljada A, Ghanim H, Mohanty P, et al. Insulin inhibits the proinflammatory transcription factor early growth response gene-I (Egr)-1 expression in mononuclear cells (MNC) andl reduces plasma tissue factor (TF) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-I (PAI-I) concentrations[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Melab, 200287(3): 1419-1422
16
Kim YS, Lim CS, Kim S, et al. Cadaveric renal allograft at the time of implantation has the similar immunological features with the rejecting allograft[J]. Transplantation, 200070(7):1080-1085.
17
Kusaka M, Pratschke J, Wilhelm MJ, et al. Activation of inflammatory mediators in rat renal isografts by donor brain death[J]. Transplantation, 200069(3):405-410.
18
Novick D, Kim S, Kaplanski G, et al. Interleukin-18, more than a Th1 cytokine[J]. Semin Immunol, 201325(6):43-448.
19
Gonzalez F, Vincent F. Biomarkers for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients[J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 201278(12):1394-1403.
20
Haase-Fielitz A, Bellomo R, Devarajan P, et al. Novel and conventional serum biomarkers predicting acute kidney injury in adult cardiac surgery-a prospective cohort study[J]. Crit Care Med, 2009. 37(2):553-560.
21
Wasung ME, Chawla LS, Madero M. Biomarkers of renal function, which and when?[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2015438:350-357.
22
Haase M, Bellomo R, Devarajan P, et al. Accuracy of neutrophil gelatinaseassociated lipocalin (NGAL) in diagnosis and prognosis in acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 200954(6):1012-1024.
23
Singer E, Markó L, Paragas N, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin: pathophysiology and clinical applications[J]. Acta Physiol (Oxf), 2013207(4):663-672.
24
Ho J, Tangri N, Komenda P, et al. Urinary, plasma, and serum biomarkers′ utility for predicting acute kidney injury associated with cardiac surgery in adults: a meta-analysis[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 201566(6):993-1005.
[1] 高农, 潘宜鹏, 任秀昀. 兔脑死亡状态下肝超声造影微血流灌注研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(07): 710-714.
[2] 中国肝移植注册中心, 国家肝脏移植质控中心, 国家人体捐献器官获取质控中心, 国家骨科与运动康复临床医学研究中心, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会移植器官质量控制专业委员会中国医院协会器官获取与分配工作委员会, 国家创伤医学中心器官保护专业委员会. 中国移植器官保护专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 241-254.
[3] 江文诗, 何湘湘. 全球及我国器官捐献发展特征分析与学科建设[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 280-286.
[4] 谢琴芬, 彭传会, 郑树森. 体外膜肺氧合在器官移植领域中的应用进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 156-160.
[5] 陈忠宝, 周江桥, 邱涛, 张龙, 邹寄林, 马枭雄, 王天宇. 颅脑损伤尿崩症供者维护策略及其供肾移植疗效分析[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 114-117.
[6] 江文诗, Maria Paula Gomez, Gloria Paez, Marti Manyalich. 数据之美——聚焦全球器官捐献发展趋势[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(01): 28-33.
[7] 范宁, 李志强, 郭源, 朱晓丹, 付晓悦, 许传屾, 饶伟, 王建红, 臧运金. 公民逝世后器官捐献原位劈离式肝移植单中心经验[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(04): 216-220.
[8] 刘岩峰, 熊韫祎, 王东, 陈文芳, 苏乔, 李雯雯, 黄慧婷, 刘龙山, 王长希. 淫羊藿苷保护脑死亡大鼠肾损伤的作用及机制研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(03): 143-147.
[9] 杨卿, 梁智星, 易述红, 易慧敏, 张彤, 傅斌生, 曾凯宁, 冯啸, 张英才, 姚嘉, 唐晖, 刘剑戎, 魏绪霞, 陈规划, 杨扬. 合并高钠血症供肝在劈离式肝移植中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(06): 586-591.
[10] 顾世杰, 马麟, 陈秋源, 崔瑞文, 赖柏聪, 石小红, 孟凡航, 易述红, 曹荣华. 徒手-机器联合复苏在脑死亡供者心脏骤停后器官维护中的作用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 283-287.
[11] 钟自彪, 叶啟发, 范晓礼, 李玲, 王彦峰. 家兔脑死亡后肝损伤机制[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2013, 02(05): 322-326.
[12] 徐桂兴, 刘华, 于萍, 郑东华. 急性神经重症患者7天内进展为脑死亡的预测评分[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2020, 06(02): 81-85.
[13] 李瑞豪, 任海军, 侯博儒, 杨文桢, 王登峰, 薛鑫, 卢维新. 经颅多普勒超声在重型颅脑创伤救治中的临床应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 04(06): 374-376.
[14] 孙奥, 李文臣, 陈勃, 王海峰. 颅脑创伤后脑死亡判定辅助技术的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 04(06): 371-373.
[15] 李文臣, 赵景伟, 栾永昕, 付双林, 何川, 潘杰, 孙雷, 王海峰. 吉林省颅脑损伤后器官捐献140例临床分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2016, 02(02): 74-77.
阅读次数
全文


摘要