切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 347 -352. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2021.06.005

论著

肝移植术后耐碳青霉烯肺炎克雷伯菌感染危险因素分析
李文磊1, 武聚山1, 贾哲1, 潘娜1, 吴文悦1, 段斌炜1, 栗光明1,()   
  1. 1. 100069 首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院普外科 肝移植中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-14 出版日期:2021-12-25
  • 通信作者: 栗光明
  • 基金资助:
    北京市医院管理中心重点医学专业发展计划(ZYLX202124)

Risk factors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection after liver transplantation

Wenlei Li1, Jushan Wu1, Zhe Jia1, Na Pan1, Wenyue Wu1, Binwei Duan1, Guangming Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Liver Transplantation Center, Beijing You′an Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
  • Received:2021-04-14 Published:2021-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Guangming Li
引用本文:

李文磊, 武聚山, 贾哲, 潘娜, 吴文悦, 段斌炜, 栗光明. 肝移植术后耐碳青霉烯肺炎克雷伯菌感染危险因素分析[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 347-352.

Wenlei Li, Jushan Wu, Zhe Jia, Na Pan, Wenyue Wu, Binwei Duan, Guangming Li. Risk factors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection after liver transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(06): 347-352.

目的

探讨肝移植术后耐碳青霉烯肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)感染危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年1月在北京佑安医院肝移植中心接受肝移植手术并随访超过3个月的186例受者临床资料。按术后是否出现CRKP感染分为无感染组(n=63)、非CRKP感染组(n=102)和CRKP感染组(n=21)。观察受者年龄、性别、终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分和Child-Pugh分级等术前指标,手术时间、无肝期时间、失血量和输血量等术中指标,气管插管和ICU停留时间、并发症发生率和连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)等术后指标。非正态分布计量资料采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行比较,组间比较采用Dunn检验。计数资料采用χ2检验及Bonferroni校正进行比较。采用多分类logistic回归分析CRKP感染发生的危险因素。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

无感染组、非CRKP感染组和CRKP感染组受者术前MELD评分、Child-Pugh分级、原发性肝癌、肝衰竭、术前感染、术前1个月内碳青霉烯类抗菌药物使用超过7 d以及术前气管插管比例差异均有统计学意义(χ2=9.03、22.67、3.80、3.15、13.67、8.52和7.29,P均<0.05)。三组受者术中失血量、术中输血量差异均有统计学意义(χ2=15.60、23.08,P均<0.05)。截至2020年4月1日,所有受者随访时间均超过3个月。无感染组受者未发生死亡;非CRKP感染组和CRKP感染组受者分别死亡17、14例(均于住院期间死亡),病死率分别为17%和67%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=23.09,P<0.05)。3组受者气管插管时间、ICU停留时间以及并发症、CRRT、移植术后早期肝功能不全和合并感染比例差异均有统计学意义(χ2=22.92、14.46、30.34、21.91、5.74、77.21,P均<0.05)。与无感染组比较,CRKP感染发生的危险因素分别为:受者性别、MELD评分、术前1个月内碳青霉烯类抗菌药物使用超过7 d、术前感染以及原发病为肝衰竭和原发性肝癌(OR=0.25、1.09、7.14、7.17、8.70和0.22,P均<0.05)。

结论

受者性别、MELD评分、术前1个月内碳青霉烯类抗菌药物使用超过7天、术前感染以及原发病诊断肝衰竭和原发性肝癌是肝移植术后CRKP感染的危险因素,对术前指导抗菌药物合理使用、降低耐药菌感染风险以及术后准确、有针对性抗感染治疗具有重要临床意义。

Objective

To investigate the risk factors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infection after liver transplantation.

Methods

The clinical data of 186 patients who underwent liver transplantation in the Liver Transplantation Center of Beijing You′an Hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into non-infected group (n=63), non-CRKP-infected group (n=102) and CRKP-infected group (n=21). The preoperative indexes such as age, gender, modle for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and Child-Pugh grade, the intraoperative indexes such as operation time, anhepatic period, blood loss and blood transfusion, the time of endotracheal intubation and ICU stay, the incidence of complications and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were observed. Abnormal distribution data were compared by Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn test was used for inter-group comparison. The counting data were compared by Chi-square test and Bonferroni correction. The risk factors of CRKP infection in perioperative period were analyzed by multiple logistic regression. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were significant differences in preoperative MELD score, Child-Pugh grade, primary liver cancer, liver failure, preoperative infection, use of carbapenem antibiotics for more than 7 days in one month before operation and the proportion of preoperative endotracheal intubation among non-infected group, non-CRKP-infected group and CRKP-infected group (χ2= 9.03, 22.67, 3.80, 3.15, 13.67, 8.52 and 7.29, all P<0.05). There were significant differences in intraoperative blood loss and transfusion among three groups (χ2=15.60, 23.08, all P<0.05). As of April 1, 2020, all subjects had been followed up for more than 3 months. There was no death in the non-infected group; 17 and 14 patients in non-CRKP-infected group and CRKP-infected group died respectively (all died during hospitalization). The mortality rates were 17% and 67%, respectively (χ2= 23.09, P<0.05). There were significant differences in intubation time, ICU stay, complications, CRRT, early liver dysfunction and the proportion of co-infection among the three groups (χ2= 22.92, 14.46, 30.34, 21.91, 5.74 and 77.21, all P<0.05). Compared with the non-infected group, the risk factors of CRKP infection were recipient gender, MELD score, use of carbapenem antibiotics for more than 7 days in one month before operation, preoperative infection and preoperative diagnosis of liver failure and liver cancer (OR= 0.25, 1.09, 7.14, 7.17, 8.70 and 0.22, all P<0.05).

Conclusions

Recipient gender, MELD score, carbapenem antibiotics used for more than 7 days within one month before operation, preoperative infection and preoperative diagnosis of liver failure and liver cancer are high risk factors for CRKP infection after liver transplantation, which has important clinical significance for guiding rational use of antibiotics before operation, reducing the risk of infection caused by drug-resistant bacteria and accurate and targeted anti-infection treatment after operation.

表1 无感染组、非CRKP感染组和CRKP感染组肝移植受者术前临床资料比较
表2 无感染组、非CRKP感染组和CRKP感染组肝移植受者术中临床资料比较[M(MinMax)]
表3 无感染组、非CRKP感染组和CRKP感染组肝移植受者术后临床资料比较
表4 肝移植受者术后CRKP感染危险因素分析
1
中华医学会器官移植学分会. 器官移植术后耐药菌感染诊疗技术规范(2019版)[J]. 器官移植2019, 10(4):352-358.
2
中华医学会外科学分会外科感染与重症医学学组. 中国腹腔感染诊治指南(2019版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志2020, 1(40):1-16.
3
中华医学会器官移植学分会. 实体器官移植术后感染诊疗技术规范(2019版)——总论与细菌性肺炎[J]. 器官移植2019, 10(4):343-351.
4
国家卫生健康委员会. 导管相关性血流感染预防与控制技术指南(试行)[EB/OL]. (2021-03-17)[2021-04-10].

URL    
5
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-seventh informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S25[S]. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2017.
6
中华医学会器官移植学分会. 中国肝移植免疫抑制治疗与排斥反应诊疗规范(2019版)[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版2019, 13(4):262-268.
7
Olthoff KM, Kulik L, Samstein B, et al. Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors[J]. Liver Transpl, 2010, 16(8): 943-949.
8
Russo TA, Marr CM. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2019, 32(3): e00001-e000019.
9
中国细菌耐药监测网. 中国细菌耐监测结果(2020年1~12月)[EB/OL]. [2021-04-10].

URL    
10
李继红,时东彦,李媛媛,等. 2015-2017年耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌耐药变迁及流行调查[J]. 中国抗生素杂志2018, 43(5):572-576.
11
陈云波,嵇金如,应超群,等. 2018至2019年度全国血流感染细菌耐药监测报告[J]. 中华临床感染病杂志2021, 14(1): 32-45.
12
Xu L, Sun X, Ma X. Systematic review and meta-analysis of mortality of patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae[J]. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 2017, 16(1):18.
13
Mazza E, Prosperi M, Panzeri MF, et al. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections early after liver transplantation: a single-center experience[J]. Transplant Proc, 2017, 49(4):677-681.
14
Hong Nguyen M, Shields RK, Chen L, et al. Molecular epidemiology, natural history, and long-term outcomes of multidrug-resistant enterobacterales colonization and infections among solid organ transplant recipients[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2022, 74(3):395-406.
15
Mouloudi E, Massa E, Papadopoulos S, et al. Bloodstream infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae among intensive care unit patients after orthotopic liver transplantation: risk factors for infection and impact of resistance on outcomes[J]. Transplant Proc, 2014, 46(9):3216-3218.
16
Tumbarello M, Trecarichi EM, Tumietto F, et al. Predictive models for identification of hospitalized patients harboring KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2014, 58(6):3514-3520.
17
Miller BM, Johnson SW. Demographic and infection characteristics of patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in a community hospital: development of a bedside clinical score for risk assessment[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2016, 44(2):134-137.
18
Zilberberg MD, Nathanson BH, Sulham K, et al. Carbapenem resistance, inappropriate empiric treatment and outcomes among patients hospitalized with Enterobacteriaceae urinary tract infection, pneumonia and sepsis[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2017, 17(1):279.
[1] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[2] 马艳波, 华扬, 刘桂梅, 孟秀峰, 崔立平. 中青年人颈动脉粥样硬化病变的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 822-826.
[3] 涂家金, 廖武强, 刘金晶, 涂志鹏, 毛远桂. 严重烧伤患者鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 491-497.
[4] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[5] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[6] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[7] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[8] 侯超, 潘美辰, 吴文明, 黄兴广, 李翔, 程凌雪, 朱玉轩, 李文波. 早期食管癌及上皮内瘤变内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄的危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 383-387.
[9] 张雯, 宋牡丹, 邓雪婷, 张云. 强化营养支持辅助奥曲肽治疗肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的疗效及再出血危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 456-460.
[10] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[11] 陆猛桂, 黄斌, 李秋林, 何媛梅. 蜂蛰伤患者发生多器官功能障碍综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1010-1015.
[12] 李静静, 翟蕾, 赵海平, 郑波. 多囊肾合并囊肿的多重耐药菌感染一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 920-923.
[13] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[14] 卓徐鹏, 刘颖, 任菁菁. 感染性疾病与老年人低蛋白血症的相关性研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 896-899.
[15] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
阅读次数
全文


摘要