切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06) : 341 -346. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2021.06.004

论著

索拉非尼序贯瑞戈非尼治疗肝癌肝移植术后复发的临床疗效与安全性分析
于婷1, 刘虹2, 王彦2, 党智萍1, 翟慧敏1, 解曼1, 孔心涓1, 饶伟2,()   
  1. 1. 266003 青岛大学附属医院消化内科
    2. 266003 青岛大学附属医院器官移植中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-18 出版日期:2021-12-25
  • 通信作者: 饶伟
  • 基金资助:
    山东省社会科学普及应用研究项目(2021-SKZC-18)

Clinical efficacy and safety of sorafenib sequential regorafenib in the treatment of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation

Ting Yu1, Hong Liu2, Yan Wang2, Zhiping Dang1, Huimin Zhai1, Man Xie1, Xinjuan Kong1, Wei Rao2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China
    2. Organ Transplantation Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China
  • Received:2021-03-18 Published:2021-12-25
  • Corresponding author: Wei Rao
引用本文:

于婷, 刘虹, 王彦, 党智萍, 翟慧敏, 解曼, 孔心涓, 饶伟. 索拉非尼序贯瑞戈非尼治疗肝癌肝移植术后复发的临床疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 341-346.

Ting Yu, Hong Liu, Yan Wang, Zhiping Dang, Huimin Zhai, Man Xie, Xinjuan Kong, Wei Rao. Clinical efficacy and safety of sorafenib sequential regorafenib in the treatment of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(06): 341-346.

目的

探讨索拉非尼序贯瑞戈非尼治疗肝细胞癌(以下简称肝癌)肝移植术后复发的临床疗效与安全性。

方法

回顾性分析青岛大学附属医院2014年2月至2020年9月收治的14例肝癌肝移植术后复发接受索拉非尼序贯瑞戈非尼治疗的患者资料。14例患者经临床确诊为肝癌复发后,予索拉非尼(400 mg/次,2次/d)治疗,当出现疾病进展或患者无法耐受索拉非尼相关不良事件时,序贯口服瑞戈非尼(160 mg/次,1次/d,连续服药21 d后停药7 d,每28天为1个周期)治疗,服药期间辅以对症支持治疗,并进行规律随访,监测甲胎蛋白(AFP)、肝功能和免疫抑制剂血药浓度,定期行超声或CT等影像学检查,同时记录不良事件。非正态分布计量资料用中位数表示,采用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验进行比较。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

14例患者中,男性12例,女性2例;中位年龄56.5岁(40.0~65.0岁)。肝移植术后肿瘤复发至开始服用索拉非尼的中位时间间隔为1.0个月(0.1~6.4个月),索拉非尼中位治疗时间为2.7个月(0.9~9.2个月),中位肿瘤进展时间(TTP)为4.4个月(0.9~14.1个月)。停用索拉非尼至开始服用瑞戈非尼的中位时间间隔为16.5(1~366 d),瑞戈非尼的中位治疗时间为9.3个月(1.3~20.4个月),中位TTP为2.8个月(1.0~9.7个月),中位总生存期为20.1个月(95%CI 0.7~39.5个月)。索拉非尼治疗前后AFP及肝功能指标差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。瑞戈非尼治疗后AFP较治疗前升高,治疗后血清白蛋白较治疗前降低,差异均有统计学意义(Z=-2.691和-2.271,P均<0.05);ALT、AST和总胆红素变化差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。索拉非尼和瑞戈非尼治疗期间出现的不良事件包括:腹泻、乏力、体质量减轻和手足皮肤反应,严重程度分级分别为Ⅰ级10例次和16例次,Ⅱ级10例次和2例次,Ⅲ级均为2例次。其中,2例因严重发生严重腹泻而终止索拉非尼治疗,2例因严重手足皮肤反应分别减少瑞戈非尼剂量和停用,其余患者出现不良反应予对症处理后均可耐受。截至2020年9月,中位随访时间为12.4个月(5.6~34.2个月),共7例患者死亡,死因均为肝癌复发后肿瘤进展。存活的7例患者中,3例因出现肺部肿瘤进展而停用瑞戈非尼,4例继续应用瑞戈非尼治疗。14例患者接受索拉非尼序贯瑞戈非尼治疗后中位总生存期为14.4个月(95%CI 3.4~25.4个月),1年和2年累积生存率分别为67.7%和48.4%。

结论

索拉非尼序贯瑞戈非尼治疗肝癌肝移植术后复发具有较好的临床疗效和安全性,但仍需更大样本量的研究支持。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of sorafenib sequential regorafenib in the treatment of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

Methods

The clinical data of 14 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who had tumor recurrence after liver transplantation and received sorafenib and regorafenib were collected from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from February 2014 to September 2020. After the clinical diagnosis of recurrence of liver cancer, sorafenib (400 mg/time, twice a day, oral) was added for treatment. When the disease progressed or the adverse events of sorafenib was not tolerated, sequentially treated with regorafenib (160 mg/time, once a day, oral, continuous medication for 21 days, stop medication for 7 days, every 28 days is a cycle) treatment. The medication was supplemented with symptomatic support treatment, followed up regularly, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), liver function, immunosuppressive blood concentration, ultrasound or CT and other imaging examinations were monitored, and adverse events were recorded.

Results

Among the 14 patients who finally met the inclusion criteria, 12 were males and 2 were females; the median age was 56.5 (40.0-65.0) years. The median interval from tumor recurrence after liver transplantation to initiation of sorafenib was 1.0 (0.1-6.4) months. The median treatment time for sorafenib was 2.7 (0.9-9.2) months, and the median time to progression (mTTP) was 4.4 (0.9-14.1) months. The median time between cessation of sorafenib and initiation of regorafenib was 16.5 (1-366) d; the median treatment time of regorafenib was 9.3 (1.3-20.4) months, the mTTP was 2.8 (1.0-9.7) months, and the median overall survival (mOS) was 20.1 (95%CI 0.7-39.5) months. There were no significant differences in AFP and liver function indexes before and after sorafenib treatment (all P>0.05). AFP increased and serum albumin decreased after treatment, with statistical significance (all P<0.05). ALT, AST and total bilirubin changes had no statistical difference (all P>0.05). Adverse events during the treatment of sorafenib and regofinib included: diarrhea (9 cases and 10 cases), fatigue (9 cases and 6 cases), decreased body mass (3 cases and 2 cases), and hand-foot skin reactions (1 case and 2 cases), respectively. Among them, sorafenib treatment was terminated in 2 cases due to severe diarrhea, and the dosage of regogafenib was reduced in 1 case, and the treatment of regogafenib was discontinued in 1 case due to hand and foot skin reaction, respectively. The other patients had adverse reactions and were tolerated after symptomatic treatment. By September 2020, the median follow-up time was 12.4 (5.6-34.2) months, and a total of 7 patients died, all due to tumor progression after liver cancer recurrence. Of the 7 patients who survived, 3 were discontinued due to lung tumor progression, and 4 were continued with regofinib. The mOS was 14.4 (95%CI 3.4-25.4) months for 14 patients who received sorafenib sequential regolfinib, and the 1-year and 2-year cumulative survival rates were 67.7% and 48.4%, respectively.

Conclusion

Sorafenib sequential regorafenib for the treatment of tumor recurrence after liver transplantation of hepatocellular carcinoma has good clinical efficacy and safety, but a larger sample size of research support is still needed.

表1 14例肝癌肝移植术后复发患者索拉非尼治疗前后AFP及肝功能指标变化[M(MinMax)]
表2 14例肝癌肝移植术后复发患者瑞戈非尼治疗前后AFP及肝功能指标变化[M(MinMax)]
表3 肝癌肝移植术后复发患者靶向治疗期间免疫抑制方案调整情况(例)
图1 14例肝癌肝移植术后复发患者接受索拉非尼序贯瑞戈非尼治疗的生存曲线
1
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
2
Xu X, Chen J, Wei Q, et al. Clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in China (2018 edition)[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2019, 18(4): 307-312.
3
Sapisochin G, Bruix J. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: outcomes and novel surgical approaches[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2017, 14(4): 203-217.
4
Gunsar F. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria[J]. Exp Clin Transplant, 2017, 15(Suppl 2): 59-64.
5
Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359(4): 378-390.
6
Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase Ⅲ randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2009, 10(1): 25-34.
7
Bruix J, Qin S, Merle P, et al. Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet, 2017, 389(10064): 56-66.
8
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(2): 228-247.
9
Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, et al. CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment[J]. Semin Radiat Oncol, 2003, 13(3): 176-181.
10
Iavarone M, Invernizzi F, Czauderna C, et al. Preliminary experience on safety of regorafenib after sorafenib failure in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation[J]. Am J Transplant, 2019, 19(11): 3176-3184.
11
Zavaglia C, Airoldi A, Mancuso A, et al. Adverse events affect sorafenib efficacy in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: experience at a single center and review of the literature[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2013, 25(2): 180-186.
12
Sotiropoulos GC, Nowak KW, Fouzas I, et al. Sorafenib treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation[J]. Transplant Proc, 2012, 44(9): 2754-2756.
13
Kim BH, Park JW. Sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2018, 33(45): e286.
14
中国医师协会器官移植医师分会肝移植学组,中华医学会器官移植学分会肝移植学组. 西罗莫司在肝癌肝移植中应用的中国专家共识(2020版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志2020, 19(6): 589-597.
15
谢琴芬,郑树森. 肝癌患者肝移植后的免疫抑制剂应用[J]. 中华器官移植杂志2013, 34(9): 573-575.
16
Vivarelli M, Cucchetti A, Piscaglia F, et al. Analysis of risk factors for tumor recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: key role of immunosuppression[J]. Liver Transpl, 2005, 11(5): 497-503.
17
Benson AB, D′Angelica MI, Abbott DE, et al. Guidelines Insights: Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2019[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2019, 17(4): 302-310.
18
Vogel A, Cervantes A, Chau I, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol, 2019, 30(5): 871-873.
[1] 李淼, 朱连华, 韩鹏, 姜波, 费翔. 高帧频超声造影评价肝细胞癌血管形态与风险因素的研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 911-915.
[2] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[3] 董杰, 杨松, 杨浩, 陈翔, 张万里. 乙酰辅酶A羧化酶2基因高甲基化与肝细胞癌临床病理因素和生存期的关系[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 433-437.
[4] 黄威, 刘启, 陈流华, 滕茶香, 区喆建, 刘韩笑, 陈健聪, 张昆松. 新定义的可预测肝癌预后的焦亡相关lncRNA模型[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 357-365.
[5] 李坤河, 寇萌佳, 邝立挺. 肝移植术后二次气管插管的危险因素及预测模型的建立[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 366-371.
[6] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 上海医药行业协会. 中国肝、肾移植受者霉酚酸类药物应用专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 257-272.
[7] 陆闻青, 陈昕怡, 任雪飞. 遗传代谢病儿童肝移植受者术后生活质量调查研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 287-292.
[8] 范铁艳, 李君, 陈虹. 肝移植术后新发戊型病毒性肝炎的诊治经验[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 293-296.
[9] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[10] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[11] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[12] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[13] 王孟龙. 肿瘤生物学特征在肝癌肝移植治疗中的意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 490-494.
[14] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[15] 吴凤芸, 滕鑫, 刘连娟. 高帧频超声造影与增强磁共振对不同直径原发性高分化肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 404-408.
阅读次数
全文


摘要