切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 140 -146. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2022.03.002

论著

急性肾损伤供肾对肾移植受者预后影响分析
刘一霆1, 邱涛1, 陈忠宝1, 马枭雄1, 王天宇1, 张龙1, 邹寄林1, 金泽亚1, 徐雨1, 周江桥1,()   
  1. 1. 430060 武汉大学人民医院器官移植科
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-05 出版日期:2022-06-25
  • 通信作者: 周江桥
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(81870067,82170664); 武汉市科技计划项目(2020020601012213)

Effects of donor kidneys with acute kidney injury on the prognosis of recipients after kidney transplantation

Yiting Liu1, Tao Qiu1, Zhongbao Chen1, Xiaoxiong Ma1, Tianyu Wang1, Long Zhang1, Jilin Zou1, Zeya Jin1, Yu Xu1, Jiangqiao Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Organ Transplantation Department, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
  • Received:2022-04-05 Published:2022-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Jiangqiao Zhou
引用本文:

刘一霆, 邱涛, 陈忠宝, 马枭雄, 王天宇, 张龙, 邹寄林, 金泽亚, 徐雨, 周江桥. 急性肾损伤供肾对肾移植受者预后影响分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 140-146.

Yiting Liu, Tao Qiu, Zhongbao Chen, Xiaoxiong Ma, Tianyu Wang, Long Zhang, Jilin Zou, Zeya Jin, Yu Xu, Jiangqiao Zhou. Effects of donor kidneys with acute kidney injury on the prognosis of recipients after kidney transplantation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 140-146.

目的

分析发生急性肾损伤(AKI)供肾对肾移植受者及移植肾预后的影响。

方法

选取2015年1月至2021年9月武汉大学人民医院器官移植科71例供肾捐献前发生AKI供者(AKI 1、2和3期分别为31、16和18例)及78例非AKI供者,AKI组对应受者136例(AKI 1、2和3期供者对应受者分别为70、32和34例),非AKI组对应受者154例。采用成组t检验或单因素方差分析比较正态分布计量资料。计数资料采用卡方检验或Fisher确切概率法比较。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制受者/移植肾生存曲线并采用log-rank检验进行比较。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

AKI组供者入院时血清肌酐以及供肾获取时血清肌酐、尿素氮、血红蛋白和尿蛋白阳性比例分别为(91±51)μmol/L、(206±126)μmol/L、(17±16)mmol/L、(121±28)g/L、53.5%(38/71),非AKI组分别为(66±33)μmol/L、(53±24)μmol/L、(9±4)mmol/L、(108±22)g/L和21.8%(17/78),差异均有统计学意义(t=-3.488、-10.096、-0.432和-3.066,χ2=16.065,P均<0.05)。AKI 1期、AKI 2期和AKI 3期供者入院时血清肌酐以及供肾获取时血清肌酐和白蛋白差异均有统计学意义(F=8.275、15.012和3.840,P均<0.05)。非AKI组对应受者术后1个月血清肌酐、术后移植肾功能延迟恢复发生及移植肾存活比例分别为(106±47)μmol/L、9.1%(14/154)和98.1%(151/158),AKI组对应受者分别为(126±82)μmol/L、25.0%(34/136)和86.8%(118/136),差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.561,χ2=13.234和9.445,P均<0.05)。AKI与非AKI组供者对应受者移植肾存活率差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.445,P<0.05);AKI与非AKI组供者对应受者生存率差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.107,P>0.05)。不同AKI分期供者对应受者移植肾及受者存活率差异均无统计学意义(χ2=1.643和1.257,P均>0.05)。

结论

高分期AKI供者供肾经过积极维护能达到与低分期AKI供者供肾相似的移植效果,高分期AKI供者供肾经专业评估筛选后可作为扩大供肾来源的途径。

Objective

To investigate the effects of donor kidneys with acute kidney injury (AKI) on the prognosis of kidney transplant recipients and transplanted kidneys .

Methods

A total of 71 donors with AKI before kidney donation (AKI stages 1, 2 and 3 were 31, 16 and 18 cases, respectively) and 78 donors without AKI were selected from the Organ Transplantation Department of the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2015 to September 2021. There were 136 recipients in the AKI group (70, 32, and 34 recipients in AKI stages 1, 2, and 3), and 154 recipients in the non-AKI group. Group t test or One-Way ANOVA were used to compare the normal distribution measurement data. Chi-square test or Fisher′s exact probability methods were used to compare the count data. Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the recipient/graft survival curve and log-rank test was used for comparison. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In the AKI group, the serum creatinine at admission, and serum creatinine, urea nitrogen, hemoglobin, and the percentage of positive urine protein at donor kidney acquisition were (91±51) μmol/L, (206±126) μmol/L, (17±16) mmol/L, (121±28) g/L and 53.5% (38/71), respectively; and those were (66±33) μmol/L, (53±24) μmol/L, (9±4) mmol/L, (108±22) g/L and 21.8% (17/78) in Non-AKI group, the differences were statistically significant (t=-3.488, -10.096, -0.432 and -3.066, χ2=16.065, all P<0.05). There were significant differences in serum creatinine at admission, and serum creatinine and albumin at donor kidney acquisition among donors with AKI stage 1, AKI stage 2 and AKI stage 3 (F=8.275, 15.012 and 3.84, all P<0.05). In the non-AKI group, serum creatinine at 1 month after surgery, the percentage of delayed graft function, transplanted kidneys survival rate were (106±47) μmol/L, 9.1% (14/154) and 98.1% (151/158), respectively; and those were (126±82) μmol/L, 25.0% (34/136) and 86.8% (118/136) in AKI group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=-2.561, χ2=13.234 and 9.445, all P<0.05). There was significant difference in the survival rate of corresponding transplanted kidneys for the AKI group and the non-AKI group (χ2=9.445, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the survival rate of corresponding recipients for the AKI group and the non-AKI group (χ2=3.107, P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the survival rate of corresponding transplanted kidneys and recipients for donors with different AKI stages (χ2=1.643 and 1.257, all P>0.05).

Conclusions

After active organ maintenance, donor kidneys from high-stage AKI donors can achieve transplantation effects similar to those from low-stage AKI donors. Donor kidneys from high-stage AKI donors can be used as a way to expand donor kidney sources after professional evaluation and screening.

表1 非AKI和AKI组供者一般资料比较
表2 不同AKI分期供者一般资料比较
表3 非AKI组和AKI组供者对应肾移植受者一般资料比较
表4 不同AKI分期供者对应肾移植受者一般资料比较
图1 AKI与非AKI供者对应移植肾及受者术后生存曲线注:AKI.急性肾损伤
图2 不同AKI分期供者对应移植肾及受者术后生存曲线注:AKI.急性肾损伤
1
Jay CL, Abecassis MM. The " opportunity costs" of kidney transplantation[J]. Am J Transplant, 2018, 18(5): 1044-1045.
2
Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual Data Report: Kidney[J]. Am J Transplant, 2020, 20 Suppl s1: 20-130.
3
Lia D, Singer P, Nair V, et al. DCD renal transplantation from donors with acute kidney injury[J]. Transplantation, 2021105(4): 886-890.
4
Hall IE, Schroppel B, Doshi MD, et al. Associations of deceased donor kidney injury with kidney discard and function after transplantation[J]. Am J Transplant, 2015, 15(6): 1623-1631.
5
Boffa C, van de Leemkolk F, Curnow E, et al. Transplantation of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury: friend or foe?[J]. Am J Transplant, 2017, 17(2): 411-419.
6
Lee MH, Jeong EG, Chang JY, et al. Clinical outcome of kidney transplantation from deceased donors with acute kidney injury by Acute Kidney Injury Network Criteria[J]. J Crit Care, 2014, 29(3): 432-437.
7
Sonnenberg EM, Hsu JY, Cohen JB, et al. Acute kidney injury in deceased organ donors and kidney transplant outcomes: a national cohort study using a novel data source[J]. Ann Surg, 2020. [Online ahead of print]
8
Kellum JA, Lameire N; KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1)[J]. Crit Care, 2013, 17(1): 204.
9
汤晓静,梅长林.KDIGO指南解读:急性肾损伤的诊治[J].中国实用内科杂志201232(12):914-917.
10
Yarlagadda SG, Coca SG, Garg AX, et al. Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2008, 23(9): 2995-3003.
11
Senel FM, Karakayali H, Moray G, et al. Delayed graft function: predictive factors and impact on outcome in living-related kidney transplantations[J]. Ren Fail, 1998, 20(4): 589-595.
12
Huang Z, Song T, Fu L, et al. Post-renal transplantation anemia at 12 months: prevalence, risk factors, and impact on clinical outcomes[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2015, 47(9): 1577-1585.
13
Franzin R, Stasi A, Fiorentino M, et al. Inflammaging and complement system: a link between acute kidney injury and chronic graft damage[J]. Front Immunol, 2020, 11: 734.
14
Kayler LK, Garzon P, Magliocca J, et al. Outcomes and utilization of kidneys from deceased donors with acute kidney injury[J]. Am J Transplant, 2009, 9(2): 367-73.
15
Zheng YT, Chen CB, Yuan XP, et al. Impact of acute kidney injury in donors on renal graft survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ren Fail, 2018, 40(1): 649-656.
16
Liu C, Hall IE, Mansour S, et al. Association of deceased donor acute kidney injury with recipient graft survival[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2020, 3(1): e1918634.
17
Hall IE, Akalin E, Bromberg JS, et al. Deceased-donor acute kidney injury is not associated with kidney allograft failure[J]. Kidney Int, 2019, 95(1): 199-209.
18
Verbesey J, Thomas AG, Ronin M, et al. Early graft losses in paired kidney exchange: experience from 10 years of the National Kidney Registry[J]. Am J Transplant, 2020, 20(5): 1393-1401.
19
Rijkse E, Ceuppens S, Qi HC, et al. Implementation of donation after circulatory death kidney transplantation can safely enlarge the donor pool: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2021, 92: 106021.
20
Swinarska JT, Stratta RJ, Rogers J, et al. Early graft loss after deceased-donor kidney transplantation: What are the consequences?[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2021, 232(4): 493-502.
21
张朋朋,明英姿,叶啟发. 肾移植术后重症肺部感染患者死亡危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版2016, 10(2): 66-70.
22
杨淑蓉,贾会学,李六亿. 肾移植术后肺部感染的调查与分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志2009, 19(2): 162-163.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[6] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[7] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[8] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[9] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[10] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[11] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[12] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[13] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[14] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?