切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 147 -152. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2022.03.003

论著

符合杭州标准肝癌肝移植受者术前接受经导管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗对术后疗效影响临床分析
杨程凯1, 许嘉绵1, 王华翔1, 林鹏1, 吴小雅1, 洪成恩1, 蔡秋程2, 吕立志2, 潘凡2, 江艺2,()   
  1. 1. 350025 福州,福建医科大学福总临床医学院肝胆外科
    2. 350025 福州,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-19 出版日期:2022-06-25
  • 通信作者: 江艺
  • 基金资助:
    福建省自然科学基金重点项目(2020Y0078); 福建省自然科学基金项目(2020J011136)

Postoperative efficacy of preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy for liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma meeting Hangzhou criteria

Chengkai Yang1, Jiamian Xu1, Huaxiang Wang1, Peng Lin1, Xiaoya Wu1, Cheng′en Hong1, Qiucheng Cai2, Lizhi Lyu2, Fan Pan2, Yi Jiang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fuzong Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350025, China
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the 900th Hospital of the Joint Support Force of the Chinese People′s Liberation Army, Fuzhou 350025, China
  • Received:2022-03-19 Published:2022-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Yi Jiang
引用本文:

杨程凯, 许嘉绵, 王华翔, 林鹏, 吴小雅, 洪成恩, 蔡秋程, 吕立志, 潘凡, 江艺. 符合杭州标准肝癌肝移植受者术前接受经导管动脉化疗栓塞术治疗对术后疗效影响临床分析[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 147-152.

Chengkai Yang, Jiamian Xu, Huaxiang Wang, Peng Lin, Xiaoya Wu, Cheng′en Hong, Qiucheng Cai, Lizhi Lyu, Fan Pan, Yi Jiang. Postoperative efficacy of preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy for liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma meeting Hangzhou criteria[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 147-152.

目的

分析符合杭州标准肝癌肝移植受者术前接受经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗对术后肿瘤复发和受者生存情况的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2008年1月至2018年12月在中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院收治的92例符合杭州标准并行肝移植治疗的肝移植受者临床资料,所有受者均经术后病理检查证实为肝细胞癌。根据受者肝移植术前是否接受TACE治疗将其分为TACE治疗组(n=58)和直接移植组(n=34)。符合正态分布计量资料采用成组t检验比较,不符合正态分布计量资料采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较,计数资料采用卡方检验或Fisher确切概率法比较。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,并采用log-rank检验进行比较。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

随访截至2021年12月31日,92例受者术后平均随访时间为(77±48)个月,随访期间共32例受者肿瘤复发。92例受者中9例术前合并门静脉癌栓(PVTT),术前影像学检查均未发现有门静脉侵犯,术后病理提示存在微静脉癌栓,均属于PVTT Ⅰ0型,9例受者中6例移植术后肿瘤复发,平均无瘤生存时间为(51±48)个月,7例死亡,平均生存时间为(62±43)个月。TACE治疗组受者术后1、3和5年生存率分别为96.6%、84.5%和82.8%,直接移植组分别为91.2%、67.6%和61.8%,两组受者术后1、3年生存率差异均无统计学意义(χ2=1.205和3.571,P均>0.05);两组受者术后5年生存率差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.039,P<0.05)。TACE治疗组受者术后1、3和5年无瘤生存率分别为87.9%、77.6%和75.9%,直接移植组分别为76.5%、58.8%和52.9%,两组受者术后1、3年无瘤生存率差异均无统计学意义(χ2=2.063和3.639,P均>0.05);两组受者术后5年无瘤生存率差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.124,P<0.05)。两组受者术后生存率及术后无瘤生存率差异均有统计学意义(χ2=5.013和5.406,P<0.05)。

结论

对于符合杭州标准的肝癌肝移植受者,术前接受TACE治疗可能改善移植术后长期疗效。

Objective

To compare the effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy on tumor recurrence and survival in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who met Hangzhou criteria.

Methods

The clinical data of 92 liver transplant recipients with HCC who met the Hangzhou criteria and underwent liver transplantation in the 900th Hospital of the Joint Support Force of Chinese People′s Liberation Army from January 2008 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All recipients were confirmed to have HCC by postoperative pathological examination. Recipients were divided into TACE treatment group (n=58) and direct transplantation group (n=34) according to whether they received TACE treatment before liver transplantation. Measurement data conforming to normal distribution were compared by group t test, measurement data not conforming to normal distribution were compared by Mann-Whitney U test, and enumeration data were compared by chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

During the follow-up until December 31, 2021, the average postoperative follow-up time of 92 recipients was (77±48) months, and a total of 32 recipients had tumor recurrence during the follow-up period. Nine of the 92 recipients had preoperative portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), none of whom were found to have portal vein invasion by preoperative imaging, and postoperative pathology revealed the presence of venular tumor thrombus, which belonged to PVTT type Ⅰ0. Of the 9 recipients, 6 had tumor recurrence after transplantation, with a mean disease-free survival time of (51±48) months, and 7 recipients died, with a mean survival time of (62±43) months. The survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years after operation were 96.6%, 84.5% and 82.8% in TACE group and 91.2%, 67.6% and 61.8% in direct transplantation group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the survival rates at 1 and 3 years after operation between the two groups (χ2=1.205 and 3.571, all P>0.05). There was significant difference in the survival rate at 5 years after transplantation between the two groups (χ2=5.039, P<0.05). The postoperative 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 87.9%, 77.6% and 75.9% in TACE group and 76.5%, 58.8% and 52.9% in direct transplantation group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the postoperative 1- and 3-year disease-free survival rates between the two groups (χ2=2.063 and 3.639, all P>0.05). There was significant difference in the postoperative 5-year disease-free survival rate between the two groups (χ2=5.124, P<0.05). There were significant differences in the postoperative survival rate and postoperative disease-free survival rate between the two groups (χ2=5.013 and 5.406, all P<0.05).

Conclusion

For liver transplant recipients with liver cancer who meet Hangzhou criteria, preoperative TACE treatment may improve the long-term efficacy after transplantation.

表1 TACE治疗组与直接移植组肝移植受者一般资料比较
图1 TACE治疗组与直接移植组肝移植受者术后生存曲线注:TACE.经导管动脉化疗栓塞术
图2 TACE治疗组与直接移植组肝移植受者术后无瘤生存率注:TACE.经导管动脉化疗栓塞术
1
Zhou M, Wang H, Zeng X, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017[J]. Lancet, 2019, 394 (10204): 1145-1158.
2
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66 (2):115-132.
3
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2022年版) [J]. 中华消化外科杂志2022, 21 (2): 143-168.
4
Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Makuuchi M, et al. Comparison of resection and ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study based on a Japanese nationwide survey[J]. J Hepatol, 2013, 58 (4):724-729.
5
Halazun KJ, Najjar M, Abdelmessih RM, et al. Recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a new MORAL to the story[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265 (3):557-564.
6
Sieghart W, Hucke F, Peck-Radosavljevic M. Transarterial chemoembolization: modalities, indication, and patient selection[J]. J Hepatol, 2015, 62 (5):1187-1195.
7
Oligane HC, Close ON, Xing M, et al. Bridging locoregional therapy: Longitudinal trends and outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Transplant Rev (Orlando), 2017, 31 (2):136-143.
8
中国医师协会器官移植医师分会,中华医学会器官移植学分会肝移植学组. 中国肝癌肝移植临床实践指南(2021版) [J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版2021, 15 (6):321-328.
9
Fagenson AM, Gleeson EM, Pitt HA,et al. Albumin-bilirubin score vs model for end-stage liver disease in predicting post-hepatectomy outcomes[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2020, 230(4):637-645.
10
王佳,王红艳,胡春玲,等. 乙肝相关性肝癌患者发生血管浸润、微血管侵犯和门静脉癌栓的危险因素分析[J]. 河南医学研究2018, 27 (21):3845 -3849.
11
程树群,吴孟超,陈汉,等. 肝癌门静脉癌栓分型的影像学意义[J]. 中华普通外科杂志2004, 19(4): 200-201.
12
Shuqun C, Mengchao W, Han C, et al. Tumor thrombus types influence the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with the tumor thrombi in the portal vein[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2007, 54 (74):499-502.
13
Villanueva A. Hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380 (15):1450-1462.
14
Shen JY, Li C, Wen TF, et al. Transplantation versus hepatectomy for HCC beyond the Milan criteria: a propensity score analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2017, 44: 33-42.
15
Maddala YK, Stadheim L, Andrews JC, et al. Drop-out rates of patients with hepatocellular cancer listed for liver transplantation: outcome with chemoembolization[J]. Liver Transpl, 2004, 10 (3):449-455.
16
Chen RX, Gan YH, Ge NL, et al. Comparison of transarterial chemoembolization with radiofrequency ablation for unresectable Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 31 (2):442-449.
17
Fiore F, Del Prete M, Franco R, et al. Transarterial embolization (TAE) is equally effective and slightly safer than transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) to manage liver metastases in neuroendocrine tumors[J]. Endocrine, 2014, 47 (1):177-182.
18
Nicolini D, Svegliati-Baroni G, Candelari R, et al. Doxorubicin-eluting bead vs conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19 (34):5622-5632.
19
Starzl TE, Marchioro TL, Vonkaulla KN, et al. Homotransplantation of the liver in humans[J]. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1963, 117:659-676.
20
Penn I. Hepatic transplantation for primary and metastatic cancers of the liver[J]. Surgery, 1991, 110 (4): 726-735.
21
Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 1996, 334 (11):693-699.
22
Lei JY, Wang WT, Yan LN. "Metroticket" predictor for assessing liver transplantation to treat hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center analysis in mainland China[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19 (44):8093-8098.
23
Clavien PA, Lesurtel M, Bossuyt PM, et al. Recommendations for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an international consensus conference report[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2012, 13 (1): e11.
24
Lai Q, Avolio AW, Manzia TM, et al. Combination of biological and morphological parameters for the selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma waiting for liver transplantation[J]. Clin Transplant, 2012, 26 (2): E125.
25
De Carlis L, Giacomoni A, Pirotta V, et al. Surgical treatment of hepatocellular cancer in the era of hepatic transplantation[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2003, 196 (6):887-897.
26
Yaprak O, Akyildiz M, Dayangac M, et al. AFP level and histologic differentiation predict the survival of patients with liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2012, 11 (3):256-261.
27
吕少诚,潘冰,李立新,等. 不同肝癌肝移植标准受者预后分析[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版2019, 13(3): 206-209.
28
Zheng SS, Xu X, Wu J, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Hangzhou experiences[J]. Transplantation, 2008, 85 (12):1726-1732.
29
Toso C, Kneteman NM, James Shapiro AM, et al. The estimated number of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma selected for liver transplantation using expanded selection criteria[J]. Transpl Int, 2009, 22 (9):869-875.
30
孙超,罗清波,卢修贤,等. 符合米兰标准和杭州标准的肝癌肝移植受者预后回顾性分析[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版2015, 9(2):58-62.
31
Hodavance MS, Vikingstad EM, Griffin AS, et al. Effectiveness of transarterial embolization of hepatocellular carcinoma as a bridge to transplantation[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2016, 27 (1):39-45.
32
Lei J, Zhong J, Luo Y, et al. Response to transarterial chemoembolization may serve as selection criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma liver transplantation[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8 (53): 91328-91342.
33
Kim DY, Choi MS, Lee JH, et al. Milan criteria are useful predictors for favorable outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing liver transplantation after transarterial chemoembolization[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2006, 12 (43):6992-6997.
34
Takizawa D, Kakizaki S, Sohara N, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: clinical characteristics, prognosis, and patient survival analysis[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2007, 52 (11):3290-3295.
35
Ma KW, Chan ACY, Chok KSH, et al. Liver transplantation: would it be the best and last chance of cure for hepatocellular carcinoma with major venous invasion?[J]. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr, 2021, 10(3):308-314.
36
郑树森,徐骁,俞军,等. 肝移植治疗肝细胞癌合并门静脉癌栓的临床价值[J]. 中国实用外科杂志2004, 24(9): 540-542.
37
吕毅,王博,于良,等. 肝移植治疗合并门静脉癌栓的肝癌[J]. 中华消化外科杂志2011, 10(4): 317-318.
[1] 李淼, 朱连华, 韩鹏, 姜波, 费翔. 高帧频超声造影评价肝细胞癌血管形态与风险因素的研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 911-915.
[2] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[3] 董杰, 杨松, 杨浩, 陈翔, 张万里. 乙酰辅酶A羧化酶2基因高甲基化与肝细胞癌临床病理因素和生存期的关系[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 433-437.
[4] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[5] 邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 赵冰, 王明刚. 基于术前腹部CT的卷积神经网络对腹壁切口疝术后复发预测价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 677-681.
[6] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[7] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[8] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[9] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[10] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[11] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[12] 叶文涛, 吴忠均, 廖锐. 癌旁组织ALOX15表达与肝癌根治性切除术后预后的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 708-712.
[13] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[14] 吴凤芸, 滕鑫, 刘连娟. 高帧频超声造影与增强磁共振对不同直径原发性高分化肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 404-408.
[15] 张政赢, 鞠阳, 刘晓宁. 二甲双胍对2型糖尿病患者大肠腺瘤术后复发的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 485-488.
阅读次数
全文


摘要