切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 134 -139. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2023.03.002

论著

2017至2021年中国95家医疗机构肝移植术后免疫抑制剂用药分析
徐烨, 李婧, 刘冉佳, 潘晨, 郭明星, 崔向丽()   
  1. 100050 北京,首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院药学部;100069 北京,首都医科大学药学院
    100050 北京,首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院药学部
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-20 出版日期:2023-06-25
  • 通信作者: 崔向丽
  • 基金资助:
    北京友谊医院科研启动基金资助项目(yygdktgl2021-3); 北京市通州区科技计划项目(KJ2022CX039)

Analysis of the use of immunosuppressants after liver transplantation in 95 hospitals in China during 2017-2021

Ye Xu, Jing Li, Ranjia Liu, Chen Pan, Mingxing Guo, Xiangli Cui()   

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China; College of Pharmacy, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
    Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2023-01-20 Published:2023-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Xiangli Cui
引用本文:

徐烨, 李婧, 刘冉佳, 潘晨, 郭明星, 崔向丽. 2017至2021年中国95家医疗机构肝移植术后免疫抑制剂用药分析[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 134-139.

Ye Xu, Jing Li, Ranjia Liu, Chen Pan, Mingxing Guo, Xiangli Cui. Analysis of the use of immunosuppressants after liver transplantation in 95 hospitals in China during 2017-2021[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 134-139.

目的

分析我国肝移植受者移植后免疫抑制剂使用特征和药费情况。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2021年12月全国9个城市95家医疗机构的肝移植门诊处方数据,包括三级医院87家,二级医院7家,一级医院1家。纳入诊断含肝移植术后且含≥1种免疫抑制剂的门诊处方。样本抽取采用二阶段抽样方法。按门诊患者人次统计处方数据,若患者单次就诊处方数大于1张,计1人次;若同一患者就诊2次或以上,按就诊次数计算人次。提取肝移植免疫抑制剂处方中年龄、性别以及处方费用及人次等信息,分析免疫抑制剂使用特征和变化趋势。

结果

共计调取肝移植门诊处方106 428人次,其中上海最多,占总人次37.90%(40 339)。2017至2021年肝移植受者各年份年龄分布情况基本一致,46~60岁患者占比最多;各年份性别构成也基本一致。共获得112 137人次的肝移植门诊报销数据。2017至2021年不同报销类型占比基本稳定不变,大部分为医保和自费,占比分别为58.21%(65 274/112 137)和24.60%(27 587/112 137)。2017至2021年期间肝移植门诊处方总人次呈上升趋势,2018至2020年免疫抑制剂次均药费逐年增长,免疫抑制剂药费在处方药费总额中的占比呈上升趋势。含有具体免疫抑制方案的肝移植门诊处方共53 084人次,以他克莫司为基础的免疫抑制方案药费占比较高,他克莫司联合霉酚酸类药费在所有免疫抑制方案中最高;在以环孢素为基础的免疫抑制方案中,环孢素联合霉酚酸类药费最高。在使用人次排序前5位的免疫抑制方案中,有4种免疫抑制方案以他克莫司为基础。他克莫司单药治疗最常使用,他克莫司联合霉酚酸类方案居第2位;在三联方案中,他克莫司联合霉酚酸类和糖皮质激素方案使用人次最多;以环孢素为基础的免疫抑制方案使用人数较少。

结论

2017至2021年随着国内肝移植手术人数增加,免疫抑制剂的药费总额呈上升趋势。他克莫司单药以及联合霉酚酸类的免疫抑制方案为肝移植术后主要免疫抑制维持方案。

Objective

To analyze the characteristics of immunosuppressant usage and medication expenses among liver transplant recipients in China.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted using prescription data from liver transplant outpatient departments in 95 hospitals across 9 cities in China from January 2017 to December 2021. The included institutions consisted of 87 tertiary hospitals, 7 secondary hospitals, and 1 primary hospital. Outpatient prescriptions were included if they involved patients who had undergone liver transplantation and were prescribed at least one type of immunosuppressant. A two-stage sampling method was used for sample selection. Prescription data were counted based on the number of outpatient visits. If a patient had multiple prescriptions during a single visit, it was counted as one visit. If the same patient had multiple visits, the total number of visits were counted. Information including age, sex, prescription costs and visit counts were extracted from the immunosuppressant prescriptions for liver transplant recipients to analyze the characteristics and trends of immunosuppressant usage.

Results

A total of 106 428 outpatient visits for liver transplant prescriptions were retrieved, with Shanghai having the highest number of visits, accounting for 37.90% (40 339) of the total visits. The age distribution of liver transplant recipients remained consistent from 2017 to 2021, with the majority being between 46 and 60 years old. The sex composition also remained relatively consistent across the years. A total of 112 137 liver transplant outpatient reimbursement data were obtained. The proportion of different reimbursement types remained stable from 2017 to 2021, with the majority being partial health insurance and self-payment, accounting for 58.21% (65 274/112 137) and 24.60% (27 587/112 137), respectively. The total number of liver transplant outpatient visits showed an upward trend from 2017 to 2021. The average costs of immunosuppressant per visit increased annually from 2018 to 2020, and the proportion of immunosuppressant costs in the total prescription costs showed an increasing trend. Among the liver transplant prescriptions with specific immunosuppressive regimens (53 084 visits), regimens based on tacrolimus had a relatively high costs proportion. The combination of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid had the highest cost among all immunosuppressive regimens. Among the regimens based on cyclosporine, the combination of cyclosporine and mycophenolic acid had the highest costs. Among the top 5 immunosuppressive regimens in terms of usage, 4 were based on tacrolimus. Monotherapy with tacrolimus was the most commonly used, followed by the combination of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Among the triple regimens, the combination of tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, and glucocorticoids had the highest usage, and regimens based on cyclosporine had a relatively lower number of users.

Conclusions

From 2017 to 2021, with the increase in the number of liver transplant surgeries in China, the total costs of immunosuppressants showed an upward trend. Tacrolimus monotherapy and the combination of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid have become the main immunosuppressive maintenance regimens after liver transplantation.

表1 2017至2021年全国95家医疗机构肝移植受者门诊处方年龄分布[人次(%)]
表2 2017至2021年全国95家医疗机构肝移植受者门诊处方性别分布[人次(%)]
表3 2017至2021年全国95家医疗机构肝移植受者门诊处方免疫抑制剂药费报销情况[人次(%)]
表4 2017至2021年全国95家医疗机构肝移植门诊处方中免疫抑制剂药费情况
表5 2017至2021年全国95家医疗机构肝移植门诊处方中不同免疫抑制方案药费情况[万元(%)]
表6 2017至2021年全国95家医疗机构肝移植门诊处方中免疫抑制方案使用情况[人次(%)]
1
Adams DH, Sanchez-Fueyo A, Samuel D. From immunosuppression to tolerance[J]. J Hepatol, 2015, 62(Suppl 1): S170-S185.
2
肝脏移植专业质控中心,中国肝移植注册中心.《国家医疗服务与质量安全报告-肝脏移植专业分册》[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2022.
3
urkoumpetis T, Levitsky J. Immunosuppressive drug levels in liver transplant recipients: impact in decision making[J]. Semin Liver Dis, 2019, 39(4):414-421.
4
中华医学会器官移植学分会. 中国肝移植免疫抑制治疗与排斥反应诊疗规范(2019版) [J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版2019, 13(4):262-268.
5
Charlton M, Levitsky J, Aqel B, et al. International liver transplantation society consensus statement on immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients[J]. Transplantation, 2018, 102(5): 727-743.
6
Cochran, William G. Sampling techniques[M]. Hoboken: Wiley, 1977.
7
Gujarat DN, Porter DC. Basic econometrics[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2009.
8
Geissler EK, Schlitt HJ. Immunosuppression for liver transplantation[J]. Gut, 2009, 58(3): 452-463.
9
Hao JC, Wang WT, Yan LN, et al. Effect of low-dose tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil on renal function following liver transplantation[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(32): 11356-11362.
10
Karie-Guigues S, Janus N, Saliba F, et al. Long-term renal function in liver transplant recipients and impact of immunosuppressive regimens (calcineurin inhibitors alone or in combination with mycophenolate mofetil): the TRY study[J]. Liver Transpl, 2009, 15(9): 1083-1091.
11
Lerut J, Sanchez-Fueyo A. An appraisal of tolerance in liver transplantation[J]. Am J Transplant, 2006, 6(8): 1774-1780.
12
Mohammad S, Li Z, Englesbe M,et al. Withdrawal of immunosuppression following pediatric liver transplantation: a Markov analysis[J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2014, 59(2): 182-189.
[1] 马敏榕, 李聪, 周勤. 宫颈癌治疗研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 497-504.
[2] 李坤河, 寇萌佳, 邝立挺. 肝移植术后二次气管插管的危险因素及预测模型的建立[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 366-371.
[3] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 上海医药行业协会. 中国肝、肾移植受者霉酚酸类药物应用专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 257-272.
[4] 陆闻青, 陈昕怡, 任雪飞. 遗传代谢病儿童肝移植受者术后生活质量调查研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 287-292.
[5] 范铁艳, 李君, 陈虹. 肝移植术后新发戊型病毒性肝炎的诊治经验[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 293-296.
[6] 陈朔, 陈峰, 程飞, 项捷. 糖原累积病Ⅰ型并发胰腺炎肝移植术后胰腺梗死一例[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 300-302.
[7] 汤鹏昊, 张武. 肠道微生态与肝移植围手术期并发症相关研究进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 303-307.
[8] 中国器官移植发展基金会器官移植受者健康管理专家委员会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 国家肝脏移植质控中心. 肝移植受者雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂临床应用中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 193-204.
[9] 巨春蓉, 何建行, 钟南山. 咪唑立宾在器官移植领域的应用及展望[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 227-231.
[10] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[11] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[12] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[13] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[14] 王孟龙. 肿瘤生物学特征在肝癌肝移植治疗中的意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 490-494.
[15] 王晓东, 汪恺, 葛昭, 丁忠祥, 徐骁. 计算机视觉技术在肝癌肝移植疗效提升中的研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 361-366.
阅读次数
全文


摘要