切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02) : 110 -115. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2024.02.007

论著

三维调强放射治疗对急性髓系白血病异基因造血干细胞移植后髓外复发的疗效观察
刘麾1, 赵鹏2, 冯静1, 胡晓彦1, 杜涛1, 王凌云1,()   
  1. 1. 550002 贵阳市第一人民医院血液肿瘤科
    2. 550004 贵阳,贵州医科大学附属医院血液内科
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-04 出版日期:2024-04-25
  • 通信作者: 王凌云
  • 基金资助:
    贵阳市高层次创新型青年卫生人才培养计划项目((2021)筑卫健科技合同第14号)

Efficacy of three-dimensional intensity modulated radiation therapy on extramedullary relapse after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukaemia

Hui Liu1, Peng Zhao2, Jing Feng1, Xiaoyan Hu1, Tao Du1, Lingyun Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hematology and Oncology, the First People′s Hospital of Guiyang, Guiyang 550002, China
    2. Department of Hematology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China
  • Received:2024-03-04 Published:2024-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Lingyun Wang
引用本文:

刘麾, 赵鹏, 冯静, 胡晓彦, 杜涛, 王凌云. 三维调强放射治疗对急性髓系白血病异基因造血干细胞移植后髓外复发的疗效观察[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 110-115.

Hui Liu, Peng Zhao, Jing Feng, Xiaoyan Hu, Tao Du, Lingyun Wang. Efficacy of three-dimensional intensity modulated radiation therapy on extramedullary relapse after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukaemia[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(02): 110-115.

目的

探究三维调强放射治疗(IMRT)对急性髓系白血病(AML)异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后髓外复发的疗效观察。

方法

回顾性分析2018年11月至2022年8月贵阳市第一人民医院收治的AML行allo-HSCT后髓外复发患者临床资料,根据治疗方式不同分为化疗组(41例)和IMRT组(36例)。比较两组患者一般资料、近期疗效、生物标志物和预后情况。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,并采用log-rank检验进行比较。计量资料组间比较采用成组t检验或重复测量资料的方差分析进行比较,计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

IMRT组并发症发生比例为5.56%(2/36),化疗组为24.39%(10/41),差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.169,P<0.05)。IMRT组完全缓解+部分缓解的比例为91.67%(33/36),高于化疗组[70.73%(29/41)],差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.356,P<0.05)。IMRT组患者治疗前及治疗后1、3和5个月血清VEGF水平分别为(754.14±66.27)、(586.03±50.24)、(364.08±48.62)和(253.26±45.20)pg/mL,CD56NK细胞比例分别为(6.14±1.27)%、(10.03±1.65)%、(11.62±1.34)%和(11.36±1.63)%;化疗组VEGF水平分别为(748.26±64.25)、(526.15±50.76)、(407.43±47.32)和(303.85±45.86)pg/mL,CD56NK细胞比例分别为(6.32±1.30)%、(10.53±1.47)%、(11.86±1.66)%和(11.09±1.78)%。两组血清VEGF水平差异有统计学意义(F交互=19.661,P<0.05);两组CD56NK细胞比例差异无统计学意义(F交互=0.084,P>0.05),但两组组内时间维度差异存在统计学意义(F时间=203.602,P<0.05)。随访截至2023年12月,IMRT组无进展生存率为91.67%,化疗组为63.41%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.542,P<0.05)。

结论

IMRT在AML患者行allo-HSCT后髓外复发的治疗中具有一定疗效,可改善临床疗效,减轻患者局部症状,与IMRT抑制肿瘤血管生成机制有关。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of three-dimensional intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) on extramedullary relapse after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML).

Methods

The clinical data of 77 AML patients treated with allo-HSCT in the First People′s Hospital of Guiyang from November 2018 to August 2022 were retrospectively analysed and divided into the chemotherapy group (41 cases) and the IMRT group (36 cases) according to the treatment modality. The general data, recent efficacy, biomarkers and prognosis of patients between the two groups were compared. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test was used for comparison. Measurement data between the groups were compared using the paired t-test or the repeated measures analysis of variance for comparison of data, and count data were compared between the groups using the χ2 test or Fisher′s exact probability method. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The incidence of complications in the IMRT group was 5.56% (2/36), while in the chemotherapy group it was 24.39% (10/41), with a statistically significant difference (χ2=5.169, P<0.05). The proportion of complete and partial remission in the IMRT group was 91.67% (33/36), which was higher than that in the chemotherapy group [70.73% (29/41)], with a statistically significant difference (χ2=5.356, P<0.05). Before and after 1, 3, and 5 months of treatment, the serum VEGF levels in the IMRT group were (754.14±66.27), (586.03±50.24), (364.08±48.62) and (253.26±45.20) pg/mL, respectively; the proportion of CD56+ NK cells was (6.14±1.27)%, (10.03±1.65)%, (11.62±1.34)% and (11.36±1.63)%, respectively. The VEGF levels in the chemotherapy group were (748.26±64.25), (526.15±50.76), (407.43±47.32) and (303.85±45.86), respectively. The proportion of CD56+ NK cells was (6.32±1.30), (10.53±1.47), (11.86±1.66) and (11.09±1.78). The difference of serum VEGF levels between the two groups were statistically significant (Ftime-group=19.661, P<0.05). No significant difference of the ratio of CD56+ NK cells was seen between the two groups (Ftime-group=0.084, P>0.05), but significant difference of the ratio of CD56+ NK cells in different time points was seen within each group (Ftime=203.602, P<0.05). The patients were followed up until December 2023, the ratio of progression-free survival of the chemotherapy group and the IMRT group were 63.41% and 91.67%, respectively, there was significant difference (χ2=8.542, P<0.05).

Conclusion

IMRT has a certain therapeutic effect in the treatment of extramedullary recurrence in AML patients after allo-HSCT, which can improve clinical efficacy, alleviate local symptoms, and is related to the mechanism of tumor angiogenesis inhibition.

表1 化疗组和IMRT组患者一般资料比较结果
表2 化疗组和IMRT组患者治疗前后VEGF和CD56 NK细胞比例比较结果( ±s)
图1 化疗组和IMRT组患者生存曲线比较注:a.无进展生存率;b.总生存率;IMRT.调强放射治疗
1
连嘉颖,叶佩佩,曹俊杰,等. 自体造血干细胞移植治疗微小残留病阴性患者中危急性髓系白血病的影响因素分析[J]. 中华内科杂志2022, 61(6): 673-677.
2
Weinberg OK, Arber DA. How i diagnose acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2022, 158(1): 27-34.
3
Yang LX, Zhang CT, Yang MY, et al. C1Q labels a highly aggressive macrophage-like leukemia population indicating extramedullary infiltration and relapse[J]. Blood, 2023, 141(7): 766-786.
4
Muratore E, Belotti T, Gottardi F, et al. Miliary leukemia cutis as extramedullary relapse of KMT2A rearranged pediatric AML[J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2023, 64(8): 1494-1496.
5
郭静钰,齐宏亮,翟贺争,等. 基于CT图像的容积旋转调强放射治疗三维剂量验证定量分析[J]. 中国医学装备2023, 20(5): 1-5.
6
王萍,高红秀,任晓艳,等. Venetoclax联合LDAC方案治疗复发难治性急性髓细胞白血病的疗效及对血清VEGF、survivin表达水平的影响[J]. 实用癌症杂志2022, 37(2): 341-344.
7
罗秋莲,曲志刚,吴雅君,等. 阿扎胞苷联合CAG方案治疗老年急性髓系白血病疗效及对患者血清VEGF和bFGF的影响观察[J]. 药物流行病学杂志2021, 30(3): 170-174.
8
李宗儒,江倩. 《中国成人急性淋巴细胞白血病诊断与治疗指南(2021年版)》——Ph阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病治疗的解读与思考[J]. 临床血液学杂志2022, 35(3): 159-164.
9
黄天骄,刘松涛,曾庆兰,等. 维奈托克联合阿扎胞苷治疗高危型骨髓增生异常综合征的临床分析[J]. 国际老年医学杂志2024, 45(2): 178-182.
10
冯奉仪. 实体瘤新的疗效评价标准(解读1.1版RECIST标准)[C] //第三届中国肿瘤内科大会论文集,北京,2009: 123-125.
11
曹勋红,王志东,孙于谦,等. 两种扩增体系NK细胞生物学特性比较及治疗异基因造血干细胞移植后白血病复发的初步研究[J]. 中华血液学杂志2022, 43(5): 400-407.
12
Rio E, Mornex F, Maingon P, et al. Hepatic tumours and radiotherapy[J]. Cancer Radiother, 2022, 26(1-2): 266-271.
13
Maines LW, Schrecengost RS, Zhuang Y, et al. Opaganib protects against radiation toxicity: implications for homeland security and antitumor radiotherapy[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(21): 13191.
14
Hao C, Ladbury C, Wong J, et al. Modern radiation for hematologic stem cell transplantation: total marrow and lymphoid irradiation or intensity-modulated radiation therapy total body irradiation[J]. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2023, 32(3): 475-495.
15
祖璎玲,周健,张莉,等. 髓系白血病异基因造血干细胞移植后髓外复发的危险因素分析[J]. 中华内科杂志2021, 60(1): 41-44.
16
Ishikawa E, Miyazaki T. Benefits and prospects of VEGF-targeted anti-angiogenic therapy and immunotherapy for high-grade glioma[J]. No Shinkei Geka, 2021, 49(3): 597-607.
17
马彦青,刘宇辰,尹成亮,等. SQLE基因表达水平在急性髓系白血病患者预后评估中的价值[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志2021, 29(1): 9-16.
18
王战芳,张芳芳,杨海,等. 老年AML患者在经地西他滨治疗中COX-2、VEGF及p53蛋白的表达及与预后关系[J]. 分子诊断与治疗杂志2020, 12(4): 520-524.
19
彭志元,杨春秀,伞景辉,等. 外周血Th17、IL-23的表达及其与急性髓细胞白血病患者免疫表型的关系分析[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志2022, 30(4): 1056-1062.
20
宋娟娟,裴艳茹,李丹,等. CD56在正常核型急性髓系白血病患者中的表达及临床意义[J]. 中华实用诊断与治疗杂志2021, 35(1): 11-14.
21
吴璨,翟志敏,吴凡,等. B7-H1通过调节肿瘤免疫微环境促进AML肿瘤细胞免疫逃逸的实验研究[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志2020, 25(6): 494-499.
22
Durie E, Nicholson E, Anthias C, et al. Determining the incidence of interstitial pneumonitis and chronic kidney disease following full intensity haemopoetic stem cell transplant conditioned using a forward-planned intensity modulated total body irradiation technique[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2021, 158: 97-103.
23
黄彦军,张建华,董春霞,等. 成人急性髓系白血病患者微移植治疗后的临床疗效及生存分析[J]. 中国实验血液学杂志2022, 30(5): 1361-1368.
24
冯婧文,王政,石祥宇,等. 基于模拟CT图像分割肿瘤治疗电场电极贴片对共面调强放疗计划剂量分布的影响[J]. 医疗卫生装备2022, 43(12): 41-47, 67.
[1] 张少华, 林爱齐, 张玉, 董晓云, 刘红英. HLAIL基因多态性及其与复发性自然流产的相关性[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 251-259.
[2] 张钊, 骆成玉, 张树琦, 何平, 李旭斌. 不同术式治疗早期乳腺癌的效果及并发症发生率、复发率比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 494-497.
[3] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[4] 高建新, 王啸飞, 于淼, 路夷平. 局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗后行ISR术远切缘距离的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 539-543.
[5] 丁志翔, 于鹏, 段绍斌. 血浆BRAF基因检测对腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术中行幽门淋巴结清扫的指导价值[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-573.
[6] 达热拜·热达提, 刘林, 赵为民, 孟涛, 雷程, 金博, 毕建军, 李新宇, 王海江. 中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后侧方淋巴结清扫术的临床观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 415-418.
[7] 宫向良, 刘征, 丁梅. 基于膜解剖D2+CME根治术治疗胃癌的近中期随访研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 267-270.
[8] 魏微阳, 杨浩, 周川鹏, 王奇, 黄红星, 黄亚强. 纤维蛋白原与白蛋白比值及其列线图模型对非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者电切术后复发的预测价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 243-248.
[9] 俞国杰, 瓦热斯·先木西丁, 米尔扎提·麦麦提, 吴婷, 张洁祥. 复发性泌尿系结石成分变化及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 259-265.
[10] 王虞鹭, 代京, 程文悦, 徐隽雅, 张剑. 体外和比格犬体内评价腹内压致生物补片分层及疝复发风险的研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 146-153.
[11] 杜鑫, 刘霞霞, 张恬波, 张夏林, 杨林花, 张睿娟. AHNAK基因高表达与老年急性髓系白血病患者预后不良相关[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 204-211.
[12] 王向丽, 吴涛, 毛东锋, 刘恒, 刘文慧, 周芮, 田红娟. 异基因造血干细胞移植治疗ANKRD26相关性血小板减少症1例并文献复习[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 236-238.
[13] 张金珠, 梅世文, 孙金峰, 胡刚, 邱文龙, 李国利, 汪欣, 王锡山, 汤坚强. 原发结直肠癌超系膜切除术后患者的生存危险因素分析[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 197-204.
[14] 田娜, 韩飞天. 基于CT平扫影像组学模型与系统免疫炎症指数预测急性胰腺炎复发模型的建立[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 355-359.
[15] 周庆, 杨旭. 甲胎蛋白、纤维蛋白原与前白蛋白比值、癌胚抗原、D-二聚体对结肠癌术后复发的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 301-305.
阅读次数
全文


摘要