切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 93 -98. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2025.02.004

论著

中重度移植肾动脉狭窄患者临床特征及危险因素分析
张岩1, 刘跃闻1, 阎浩2, 王学一1, 王博谦1, 宋醒1, 刘帅1, 杨宏伟1, 何龙1,()   
  1. 1110016 沈阳,北部战区总医院器官移植中心
    2110016 沈阳,北部战区总医院介入血管外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-18 出版日期:2025-04-25
  • 通信作者: 何龙
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省科技厅应用基础研究计划(2022JH2/101500039)

Analysis of clinical characteristics and risk factors in patients with moderate to severe transplant renal artery stenosis

Yan Zhang1, Yuewen Liu1, Hao Yan2, Xueyi Wang1, Boqian Wang1, Xing Song1, Shuai Liu1, Hongwei Yang1, Long He1,()   

  1. 1Organ Transplantation Center, Northern Theater Command General Hospital, Shenyang 110016, China
    2Interventional Vascular Surgery, Northern Theater Command General Hospital, Shenyang 110016, China
  • Received:2024-11-18 Published:2025-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Long He
引用本文:

张岩, 刘跃闻, 阎浩, 王学一, 王博谦, 宋醒, 刘帅, 杨宏伟, 何龙. 中重度移植肾动脉狭窄患者临床特征及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 93-98.

Yan Zhang, Yuewen Liu, Hao Yan, Xueyi Wang, Boqian Wang, Xing Song, Shuai Liu, Hongwei Yang, Long He. Analysis of clinical characteristics and risk factors in patients with moderate to severe transplant renal artery stenosis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(02): 93-98.

目的

通过对中重度移植肾动脉狭窄(TRAS)患者的临床特征、治疗预后进行系统性评估,探索肾移植术后发生中重度TRAS的危险因素,为早期预防、诊断和治疗提供依据。

方法

回顾性分析2022年1月至2024年7月在北部战区总医院进行肾移植,并在随访中确诊为中重度TRAS的16例患者临床资料,以接受同一供者另一侧供肾的受者作为对照。收集患者基本情况、临床表现、实验室检查结果、治疗方式以及预后情况。计量资料采用独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验或配对样本t检验比较,计数资料采用卡方检验或Fisher确切概率法进行比较。采用Cox比例风险回归分析中重度TRAS危险因素。绘制受试者操作特征曲线(ROC曲线)评估危险因素对TRAS的预测效能。

结果

肾移植术后中重度TRAS发生率为4.5%,发生中位时间为术后157 d。发生TRAS时,TRAS组中性粒细胞比值、血清尿素氮、肌酐和胱抑素水平均高于对照组,血红蛋白低于对照组(P均<0.05)。单因素分析显示,与对照组比较,TRAS组患者体质指数较低,二次移植比例较高,使用咪唑立宾患者较多,血清脂蛋白a水平较高,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。将以上因素纳入Cox比例风险回归分析,结果显示二次移植(HR=5.772,95%CI:1.227~26.684,P<0.05)、高水平脂蛋白a(HR=1.008,95%CI:1.002~1.013,P<0.05)是发生中重度TRAS的独立危险因素。对脂蛋白a绘制ROC曲线分析显示,曲线下面积0.771(95%CI:0.597~0.946,P<0.05),最佳截断值为74.95 nmol/L。TRAS组患者9例支架植入,2例单纯球囊扩张,5例球囊扩张联合支架植入;术后3、7、14和28 d以及术后2个月和3个月血清肌酐与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.959、3.354、2.795、3.148、3.040和3.721,P<0.05)。

结论

肾移植受者发生中重度TRAS时患者中性粒细胞比值较高,贫血更为严重,血清尿素氮、肌酐和胱抑素水平均明显升高。对于二次移植及脂蛋白a高于74.95 nmol/L的患者,中重度TRAS发生风险较高。介入治疗可显著改善中重度TRAS患者肾功能。

Objective

To systematically evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS), and to explore the risk factors of TRAS after kidney transplantation, providing the basis for early prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Methods

The clinical data of 16 patients who underwent kidney transplantation in Northern Theater Command General Hospital from January 2022 to July 2024 and were diagnosed with moderate-to-severe TRAS during follow-up were retrospectively analyzed, and recipients who received the other kidney from the same donor were selected as the control group. The basic information, clinical manifestations, laboratory test results, treatment methods, and prognosis of the patients were collected. Independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, or paired sample t-test were used for comparative analysis of measurement data, while chi-square test or Fisher′s exact probability method were applied to count data. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze risk factors for moderate-to-severe TRAS. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the predictive performance of risk factors for TRAS.

Results

The incidence of moderate-to-severe TRAS after kidney transplantation was 4.5%, with a median time of 157 days post-transplantation. At the time of TRAS diagnosis, the TRAS group had significantly higher neutrophil ratio, serum urea nitrogen, creatinine, and cystatin levels, and lower hemoglobin levels compared to the control group (all P<0.05). Univariate analysis showed that the TRAS group had a lower body mass index, higher proportion of re-transplantation, more frequent use of mizoribine, and higher serum lipoprotein a levels compared to the control group, with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that re-transplantation (HR=5.772, 95%CI: 1.227-26.684, P<0.05) and high lipoprotein a levels (HR=1.008, 95%CI: 1.002-1.013, P<0.05) were independent risk factors for moderate-to-severe TRAS. ROC curve analysis for lipoprotein a showed that the area under the curve was 0.771 (95%CI: 0.597-0.946, P<0.05), and the optimal cutoff value was 74.95 nmol/L. In the TRAS group, 9 patients were stented, 2 patients were treated with balloon dilatation alone, and 5 patients were treated with balloon dilatation combined with stent implantation; serum creatinine at 3, 7, 14, 28 days and 2, 3 months after interventional therapy was significantly different from that before surgery (t=2.959, 3.354, 2.795, 3.148, 3.040, and 3.721, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Patients with moderate-to-severe TRAS after kidney transplantation exhibit higher neutrophil ratios, more severe anemia, and significantly elevated serum urea nitrogen, creatinine, and cystatin levels. Interventional therapy can significantly improve renal function in such patients. Patients with re-transplantation and lipoprotein a levels >74.95 nmol/L were at higher risk of moderate-to-severe TRAS.

表1 对照组和TRAS组实验室指标比较
图1 脂蛋白a预测肾移植术后中重度TRAS的受试者操作特征曲线注:TRAS.移植肾动脉狭窄;AUC.曲线下面积
表2 肾移植术后发生中重度TRAS危险因素的单因素分析
表3 肾移植术后发生中重度TRAS危险因素的Cox比例风险回归分析
表4 肾移植术后中重度TRAS患者介入治疗前和治疗后不同时间点血清肌酐比较(±s)
1
Wojtaszek E, Głogowski T, Januszewicz M, et al. Transplant renal artery stenosis: underrecognized, not so rare, but curable complication[J]. Transplant Proc, 2022, 54(4): 976-980.
2
Buturović-Ponikvar J. Renal transplant artery stenosis[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2003, 18 Suppl 5: v74-v77.
3
Ren Y, Xiong F, Kan X, et al. Endovascular management of transplant renal artery stenosis: a single-center retrospective study[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2020, 95(3): 429-436.
4
Kolli KP, LaBerge JM. Interventional management of vascular renal transplant complications[J]. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol, 2016, 19(3): 228-236.
5
Chen W, Kayler LK, Zand MS, et al. Transplant renal artery stenosis: clinical manifestations, diagnosis and therapy[J]. Clin Kidney J, 20158(1):71-78.
6
陈忠宝,周江桥,邱涛,等. 移植肾动脉狭窄诊断及介入治疗效果评价[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版2017, 11(4): 201-205.
7
Li Marzi V, Campi R, Sessa F, et al. Standardized Duplex ultrasound-based protocol for early diagnosis of transplant renal artery stenosis: results of a single-institution retrospective cohort study[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018: 2580181.
8
Nasserala JC, Oliveira CM, Cerqueira JB, et al. Artery stenosis of the renal graft: experience of a center of northeastern Brazil[J]. Transplant Proc, 2016, 48(1): 74-80.
9
朱有华. 肾移植受者贫血的病因与诊治策略[J]. 肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志2014. 23(1): 48-49.
10
Imoagene-Oyedeji AE, Rosas SE, Doyle AM, et al. Posttransplantation anemia at 12 months in kidney recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil: risk factors and implications for mortality[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2006, 17(11): 3240-3247.
11
Ma KL, Gong TK, Hu ZB, et al. Lipoprotein(a) accelerated the progression of atherosclerosis in patients with end-stage renal disease[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2018, 19(1): 192.
12
Pedersen TX, McCormick SP, Tsimikas S, et al. Lipoprotein(a) accelerates atherosclerosis in uremic mice[J]. J Lipid Res, 2010, 51(10): 2967-2975.
13
Nicholson ML, Yong C, Trotter PB, et al. Risk factors for transplant renal artery stenosis after live donor transplantation[J]. Br J Surg, 2019, 106(3): 199-205.
14
Chan MR, Oza-Gajera B, Chapla K, et al. Initial vascular access type in patients with a failed renal transplant[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2014, 9(7): 1225-1231.
15
Rose C, Gill J, Gill JS. Association of kidney transplantation with survival in patients with long dialysis exposure[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2017, 12(12): 2024-2031.
16
李楠,徐涛,廖长礼,等. 经皮腔内介入治疗移植肾动脉狭窄的临床疗效[J]. 放射学实践2022, 37(5): 626-631.
17
刘安安. 移植肾动脉狭窄腔内治疗的临床分析及中远期效果评价[D]. 河南:郑州大学,2022.
[1] 朱晓璐, 孙希希, 柴佳园, 董泽洋, 赵梦瑶, 黄斌. 超声引导下医用无水乙醇硬化治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿疗效的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(03): 215-223.
[2] 李培真, 刘海亮, 李大伟, 贾昊, 张泽瑾, 刘力维, 申传安. 重度烧伤患者发生早期急性肾损伤危险因素分析及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(03): 199-205.
[3] 钱小梅, 罗洪, 李智慧, 周代君, 李东. 76例乙型肝炎肝硬化并发原发性肝癌的高危因素Logistic分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 251-253.
[4] 朱宗恒, 张志火. 甲状腺乳头状癌对侧中央区淋巴结转移的危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 337-340.
[5] 华小玲, 高梦昕, 陈媛, 蔡超, 刘永达, 孙红玲. 良性输尿管狭窄修复重建术研究进展及再手术现状[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 377-383.
[6] 韩亮, 叶云翔, 张玉艳, 张世科, 周高翔, 周宇豪, 李舒珏, 曾滔, 曾国华, 乔庐东, 吴文起. 上尿路结石合并尿真菌培养阳性患者的诊治经验[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 340-345.
[7] 张丽丽, 韩志海, 张春阳, 陈韦, 康奕欣, 张燕, 孟激光, 丁毅伟, 丁静, 崔俊昌. 纤维化性结缔组织病相关间质性肺疾病进展的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 434-441.
[8] 杨小钰, 樊雅欣, 苏奔, 毕蓉蓉, 张少言, 李翠, 吴定中, 鹿振辉, 邱磊. 支气管扩张症急性加重的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(03): 457-462.
[9] 杨黎渝, 刘新阳, 雷永琪, 铁学宏, 刘雨, 梁英健. 腹腔镜手术皮下气肿危险因素与防治[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 636-639.
[10] 王继才, 张广权, 吴芬芳, 史宪杰. 孟德尔随机化分析克罗恩病与非酒精性脂肪性肝病之间因果关系[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 601-608.
[11] 毛伟民, 蓝祝晶, 徐邦浩, 朱海, 王继龙, 金宗睿, 蒙柄成, 卢婷婷, 曾晶晶, 吕自力, 宋瑞, 文张. 肝肉瘤样癌14例临床诊疗分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 435-441.
[12] 周艳, 周泽阳, 程欣萌, 何月娥, 李祥勇, 吴勇. 结直肠癌患者早期造口并发症预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(03): 242-250.
[13] 康清源, 张克石, 肖文韬, 谢培森, 东黎光, 袁平, 关振鹏. 在职钢铁工人群体膝关节骨关节炎流行情况及其可能的危险因素调查[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 248-255.
[14] 王双兴, 吴永杰, 孟兵, 张宏涛, 魏丹, 张辉, 刁美. 非限制性室间隔缺损婴儿术后延迟恢复危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 188-193.
[15] 马丽, 刘文华, 刘丹, 王晓彤, 康微婉, 张毅, 王雪娇. 终末期肾脏病腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎病原菌及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 194-198.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?