切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 104 -112. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2026.02.006

论著

一种新型离体器官保存液对大鼠肾脏保存效果的实验研究
朱兰卉1,2,3, 方潇1, 葛茹茹1, 高帅1, 戴天增1, 蔡镭捷1,2,3, 周智华1,()   
  1. 1350028 福州,福建医科大学孟超肝胆医院泌尿外科
    2350028 福州,福建省孟超肝胆技术创新重点实验室
    3350108 福州,福州大学生物科学与工程学院
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-26 出版日期:2026-04-25
  • 通信作者: 周智华
  • 基金资助:
    福州市科技人才培育计划项目(2022-R-007); 福州市卫生健康委员会科研创新团队培育项目(2025-S-wt6)

Evaluation of a novel ex vivo preservation solution for rat kidney storage

Lanhui Zhu1,2,3, Xiao Fang1, Ruru Ge1, Shuai Gao1, Tianzeng Dai1, Leijie Cai1,2,3, Zhihua Zhou1,()   

  1. 1Department of Urology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350028, China
    2the United Innovation of Mengchao Hepatobiliary Technology Key Laboratory of Fujian Province, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350028, China
    3College of Biological Science and Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
  • Received:2025-08-26 Published:2026-04-25
  • Corresponding author: Zhihua Zhou
引用本文:

朱兰卉, 方潇, 葛茹茹, 高帅, 戴天增, 蔡镭捷, 周智华. 一种新型离体器官保存液对大鼠肾脏保存效果的实验研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 104-112.

Lanhui Zhu, Xiao Fang, Ruru Ge, Shuai Gao, Tianzeng Dai, Leijie Cai, Zhihua Zhou. Evaluation of a novel ex vivo preservation solution for rat kidney storage[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(02): 104-112.

目的

比较一种新型离体器官保存液(A液)与威斯康星大学保存液(UW液)、高渗枸橼酸盐腺嘌呤液(HCA液)对大鼠离体肾脏的保存效能。

方法

通过测定研制的A液离子浓度、pH值和渗透压,验证其理化性质与稳定性。通过CCK-8实验,探究A液对人胚肾上皮细胞系(293T)和肾小管上皮细胞(HK-2)的细胞活力及凋亡影响。构建大鼠供肾模型,采用随机数字表法将15只大鼠30个肾脏随机分为UW液组、HCA液组和A液组,每组各10个。将离体肾脏置于相应保存液中,分别于0、6、12、24、48、72 h收集肾组织标本。通过HE染色评估组织病理损伤,比色法测定ATP酶活性及丙二醛(MDA)含量,TUNEL染色定量分析细胞凋亡情况,蛋白质印迹法检测凋亡相关蛋白(Caspase-3、Cleaved Caspase-3、Bax、Bcl-2)及炎症因子(HO-1、TNF-α)表达。所有数据均经过至少3次重复实验获得。计量资料多组间比较采用方差分析,进一步两两比较使用Dunnett检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

体外实验显示:A液组细胞活力高于UW液组、低于HCA液组(P均<0.05)。离体大鼠肾脏保存实验显示:组织病理学方面,保存48 h时,A液组肾小管空泡化程度低于HCA液组(P<0.05),且与UW液组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。氧化应激指标中,保存48、72 h时,A液组ATP酶活性均高于UW液组和HCA液组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。A液组MDA累积速率低于HCA液组和UW液组,48、72 h MDA含量(0.27%、0.28%)均低于HCA液组(0.42%、0.42%),差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。细胞凋亡方面,保存24 h后,A液组TUNEL凋亡指数低于HCA液组,Bcl-2/Bax比值高于HCA液组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05);Cleaved Caspase-3蛋白相对表达量低于UW液组和HCA液组(P<0.05)。炎症因子方面,A液组TNF-α表达水平低于HCA液组(P<0.05),HO-1表达水平低于UW液组和HCA液组(P<0.05)。

结论

新型器官保存液在48 h内对大鼠肾脏展现出与市售经典保存液相当或更优的保护潜力。在72 h延长保存条件下,新型器官保存液可通过维持ATP酶活性、降低MDA含量并调控凋亡相关通路,具有出色的肾脏保护效能。

Objective

To compare the preservation efficacy of a novel ex vivo organ preservation solution (Solution A) was compared with that of University of Wisconsin solution (UW solution) and hypertonic citrate adenine solution (HCA solution) on isolated rat kidneys.

Methods

The physicochemical properties and stability of the novel ex vivo organ preservation solution developed at our center were validated by measuring its ion concentration, pH value, and osmolality. The cytotoxicity and apoptosis effects of Solution A on human embryonic renal epithelial cell line (293T) and renal tubular epithelial cells (HK-2) were investigated using the CCK-8 assay. A rat kidney donor model was established. A total of 30 kidneys from 15 rats were randomly divided into three groups (UW solution group, HCA solution group, and Solution A group) using a random number table method, with 10 kidneys in each group. The isolated kidneys were placed in the corresponding preservation solutions, and renal tissue samples were collected at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Histopathological damage was assessed by HE staining, ATPase activity and malondialdehyde (MDA) content were determined using colorimetric assays. Apoptosis was quantitatively analyzed by TUNEL staining, and the expression of apoptosis-related proteins (Caspase-3, Cleaved Caspase-3, Bax, Bcl-2) as well as inflammatory factors (HO-1, TNF-α) was detected by Western blotting. All experimental data were obtained from at least three indepent replicates. Comparisons of experimental data among multiple groups were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by pairwise comparisons using Dunnett′s test. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In vitro experiments demonstrated that the cell viability of the Solution A group was significantly higher than that of the UW solution group and lower than that of the HCA solution group (all P<0.05). In vitro rat kidney preservation experiments showed that at 48 hours of preservation, the degree of tubular vacuolization in the Solution A group was significantly lower than that in the HCA solution group (P<0.05), but no statistically significant difference was observed compared to the UW solution group (P>0.05). For oxidative stress indicators, the ATPase activity of the Solution A group was significantly higher than that of the UW solution and HCA solution groups at 48 and 72 hours of preservation (all P<0.05). In addition, the MDA accumulation rate in the Solution A group was lower than that in the HCA and UW solution groups, and the MDA content at 48 and 72 hours (0.27%, 0.28%) was significantly lower than that of the HCA solution group (0.42%, 0.42%) (all P<0.05). After 24 hours of preservation, the Solution A group exhibited a significantly lower TUNEL apoptosis index and a higher Bcl-2/Bax ratio compared with the HCA solution group (all P<0.05), as well as a lower relative expression level of Cleaved Caspase-3 protein compared with both the UW and HCA solution groups (P<0.05). In terms of inflammatory factors, the TNF-α expression level in the Solution A group was significantly lower than that in the HCA solution group (P<0.05), and the HO-1 expression level was significantly lower than that in both the UW and HCA solution groups (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The novel organ preservation solution exhibited renal protective potential comparable to, or even better than, that of commercially available classic preservation solutions within 48 hours in rats. Under prolonged preservation conditions up to 72 hours, the novel solution further exhibited excellent renal protective efficacy by maintaining ATPase activity, reducing MDA content, and regulating apoptosis-related pathways.

图1 UW液、新型器官保存液与HCA液pH值变化情况注:UW液.威斯康星大学保存液;A液.新型离体器官保存液;HCA液.高渗枸橼酸盐腺嘌呤液;a.A液静态冷保存180 d观察期pH值变化;b.离体大鼠肾脏保存后的UW液、A液与HCA液各时间点pH值变化
图2 UW液、新型器官保存液与HCA液对体外细胞活力和凋亡的评估结果注:CTRL.空白对照;UW液.威斯康星大学保存液;A液.新型离体器官保存液;HCA液.高渗枸橼酸盐腺嘌呤液;*.P<0.05; a.保存液对293T细胞活力和凋亡影响;b.保存液对HK-2细胞活力和凋亡影响
图3 UW液、新型器官保存液与HCA液对离体大鼠供肾组织病理学的影响(HE ×40)注:UW液.威斯康星大学保存液;A液.新型离体器官保存液;HCA液.高渗枸橼酸盐腺嘌呤液
图4 UW液、新型器官保存液与HCA液对离体大鼠供肾细胞凋亡的影响注:UW液.威斯康星大学保存液;A液.新型离体器官保存液;HCA液.高渗枸橼酸盐腺嘌呤液;*.P<0.05; a.TUNEL法检测肾组织细胞凋亡;b.TUNEL阳性细胞数目比较;c~e.蛋白质印迹法检测保存24 h肾组织标本凋亡相关蛋白(Caspase-3、Bax、Bcl-2、Cleaved Caspase-3)、Cleaved Caspase-3/Caspase-3和Bcl-2/Bax蛋白的表达
图5 UW液、新型器官保存液与HCA液对离体大鼠供肾细胞炎症相关信号通路的影响注:UW液.威斯康星大学保存液;A液.新型离体器官保存液;HCA液.高渗枸橼酸腺嘌呤液;MDA.丙二醛;HO-1:血红素加氧酶-1; Actin:β-肌动蛋白;*.P<0.05; a.比色法检测不同时间点各组肾组织ATP酶活性;b.不同时间点各组MDA含量;c~e.蛋白质印迹法检测保存24 h肾组织标本炎症相关蛋白的表达
1
中国肝移植注册中心,国家肝脏移植质控中心,国家人体捐献器官获取质控中心,等. 中国移植器官保护专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志2022, 21(2):169-184.
2
Rampersad C, Ahn C, Callaghan C, et al. Organ donation and transplantation registries across the globe: a review of the current state[J]. Transplantation, 2024, 108(10):e321-e326.
3
国家人体捐献器官获取质量控制中心,中华医学会器官移植学分会,中国医师协会器官移植医师分会,等. 中国器官捐献五年提升计划[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志:电子版2024, 18(5): 275-277.
4
武小桐,李宁. 扩大标准供者的应用[J]. 中华器官移植杂志2019, 40(10):577-579.
5
董淳强,董昆,陈军泽,等. 扩大标准供者供肝临床应用的突破与实践[J]. 中华消化外科杂志2025, 24(12):1553-1559.
6
Belzer FO, Southard JH. Principles of solid-organ preservation by cold storage[J]. Transplantation, 1988, 45(4):673-676.
7
Alshaibani K, Nizamuddin N, Raza S, et al. University of Wisconsin versus eurocollins solution for kidney preservation: analysis of clinical outcome[J]. Transplant Proc, 1998, 30(7):3681-3682.
8
Ploeg RJ, Goossens D, McAnulty JF, et al. Successful 72-hour cold storage of dog kidneys with UW solution[J]. Transplantation, 1988, 46(2):191-196.
9
Erhard J, Lange R, Scherer R, et al. Comparison of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution versus University of Wisconsin (UW) solution for organ preservation in human liver transplantation: a prospective, randomized study[J]. Transpl Int, 1994, 7(3):177-181.
10
Bretschneider HJ, Hubner G, Knoll D, et al. Myocardial resistance and tolerance to ischemia: physiological and biochemical basis[J]. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 1975, 16(3):241-260.
11
Sui M, Zhang L, Yang J, et al. A new HC-A II solution for kidney preservation: a multi-center randomized controlled trial in China[J]. Ann Transplant, 2014, 19:614-620.
12
Chang C, Wu C, Pan P, et al. Tetramethylpyrazine alleviates mitochondrial abnormality in models of cerebral ischemia and oxygen/glucose deprivation Reoxygenation[J]. Exp Neurol, 2023, 367:114468.
13
Liu Y, Yang G, Cui W, et al. Regulatory mechanisms of tetramethylpyrazine on central nervous system diseases: a review[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13:948600.
14
Panisello Rosello A, Teixeira Da Silva R, Castro C, et al. Polyethylene glycol 35 as a perfusate additive for mitochondrial and glycocalyx protection in HOPE liver preservation[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(16):5703.
15
Ostrozka-Cieslik A, Dolinska B, Ryszka F. The effectiveness of rinsing organs with selected preservation solutions based on the analysis of their physicochemical parameters[J]. Transplant Proc, 2020, 52(7):2050-2054.
16
Jing L, Yao L, Zhao M, et al. Organ preservation: from the past to the future[J]. Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2018, 39(5):845-857.
17
Friend P, Pollok J. Hypothermic machine perfusion in liver transplantation-a randomised trial and beyond[J]. Transpl Int, 2022, 35:10257.
18
Li Y, Zhu Z, Zhang T, et al. Ligustrazine attenuates inflammation and oxidative stress in a rat model of arthritis via the Sirt1/NF-jB and Nrf-2/HO-1 pathways[J]. Archives of pharmacal research, 2019, 42(9):824-831.
19
Wang K, Zhou Y, Wen C, et al. Protective effects of tetramethylpyrazine on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury involve NLRP3 inflammasome suppression by autophagy activation[J]. Biochem Pharmacol, 2024, 229:116541.
20
Rai U, Kosuru R, Prakash S, et al. Tetramethylpyrazine alleviates diabetic nephropathy through the activation of Akt signalling pathway in rats[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2019, 865:172763.
21
Yang Q, Huang DD, Li DG, et al. Tetramethylpyrazine exerts a protective effect against injury from acute myocardial ischemia by regulating the PI3K/Akt/GSK-3beta signaling pathway[J]. Cell Mol Biol Lett, 2019, 24:17.
22
Wang M, Hayashi H, Horinokita I, et al. Neuroprotective effects of Senkyunolide I against glutamate-induced cells death by attenuating JNK/caspase-3 activation and apoptosis[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2021, 140:111696.
23
Shi J, Li S, Yi L, et al. Levistolide a attenuates acute kidney injury in mice by inhibiting the TLR-4/NF-kappaB pathway[J]. Drug Des Devel Ther, 2024, 18:5583-5597.
24
Zhuang Z, Wang Z, Huang Y, et al. Protective effect and possible mechanisms of ligustrazine isolated from Ligusticum wallichii on nephropathy in rats with diabetes: a preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2020, 252:112568.
25
Zhong K, Zeng Q, Tang H, et al. Tetramethylpyrazine attenuates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting ferroptosis via the AMPK/Nrf2 pathways[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2025, 34(2):108196.
26
Hu J, Cao G, Wu X, et al. Tetramethylpyrazine inhibits activation of hepatic stellate cells through hedgehog signaling pathways in vitro[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015:603067.
27
Sun W, Li A, Wang Z, et al. Tetramethylpyrazine alleviates acute kidney injury by inhibiting NLRP3/HIF-1alpha and apoptosis[J]. Mol Med Rep, 2020, 22(4):2655-2664.
[1] 蒋丹蔚, 张琪茹, 孙伊敏, 孙来芳, 汤鲁明. 萝卜硫素对脓毒症大鼠心肌损伤的保护作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 3-9.
[2] 李晓童, 方睿, 马健, 吴吉涛, 于胜强. 人诱导多能干细胞来源外泌体对肾缺血再灌注损伤保护作用研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 421-430.
[3] 殷琴, 晏宇涵, 姚伟, 徐成文, 戴小龙, 杨豪, 徐春伟, 王栋, 袁明, 刘振玉. 大黄辅助治疗多发伤继发急性肺损伤的研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 247-252.
[4] 田井梅, 袁玉霞, 李长桂, 龙舟, 杨聚豪, 汪涓. 肺-骨轴及其在COPD并发骨质疏松症中的机制研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 168-172.
[5] 崔琳琳, 薛来恩, 付云烽, 王君竹, 郑和平, 路君, 徐永君. 大鼠羊膜间充质干细胞对STZ损伤的大鼠胰岛修复作用研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 321-328.
[6] 张浩波, 牛剑祥. NLRP3炎症小体在非酒精性脂肪性肝病中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 271-277.
[7] 赵坤霄, 刘小明, 冯杰, 胡秀红, 赵文婷, 林琼真. 激活核因子E2相关因子2信号通路抑制高糖诱导人肾小管上皮细胞上皮-间充质转化[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 15-20.
[8] 谭舒眉, 岑羽捷, 丁思文, 刘宏昊, 魏锦文, 刘子源, 李学民. 不同紫外辐照地区年龄相关性白内障患者特征和房水抗氧化酶差异的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 345-350.
[9] 徐燊, 王春琳, 江涛, 刘璐, 郑润泽, 刘家传. 缺氧预处理对创伤性颅脑损伤大鼠MANF表达及内质网应激的影响[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2026, 12(01): 8-14.
[10] 李军, 沈姝霖, 张荣炜, 黄章睿, 梁锐明, 罗世兴. 槲皮素对H2O2诱导骨关节炎软骨细胞氧化损伤的保护作用与机制研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 85-92.
[11] 李勃, 叶威良, 张静雯, 上文文. 叶酸-聚乙二醇-阿霉素连接物对肝癌裸鼠皮下移植瘤生长及心脏毒性影响的研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 101-107.
[12] 石淑勤, 贾国法, 柯希权. 酚磺乙胺联合雷贝拉唑治疗溃疡性上消化道出血的临床疗效及对患者氧化应激反应的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 31-35.
[13] 苗芳, 李晓荟, 江珊. 富马酸二甲酯对氧化应激诱导黑素细胞损伤的保护机制研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(07): 513-519.
[14] 程新婕, 王春梅. 红花对脑缺血-再灌注损伤的保护作用及机制研究进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 59-65.
[15] 贺欢, 许广鑫, 韩致毅, 崔童. 溃疡性结肠炎中氧化应激相关基因标志物的鉴定及验证[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2026, 13(01): 16-24.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?