切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 158 -163. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2023.03.006

论著

乙型肝炎肝硬化患者肝移植等待期应用多模式预康复优化项目的临床研究
雷雪雪, 于颖, 李虹彦()   
  1. 130021 长春,吉林大学第一医院放疗科
    130021 长春,吉林大学第一医院肝胆胰外一科
    130021 长春,吉林大学第一医院护理部
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-19 出版日期:2023-06-25
  • 通信作者: 李虹彦
  • 基金资助:
    吉林大学第一医院2020年护理科研基金(20200202)

Clinical research of multimodal prehabilitation optimization program in patients with hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation

Xuexue Lei, Ying Yu, Hongyan Li()   

  1. Department of Radiotherapy, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
    Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
    Department of Nursing, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
  • Received:2022-09-19 Published:2023-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Hongyan Li
引用本文:

雷雪雪, 于颖, 李虹彦. 乙型肝炎肝硬化患者肝移植等待期应用多模式预康复优化项目的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 158-163.

Xuexue Lei, Ying Yu, Hongyan Li. Clinical research of multimodal prehabilitation optimization program in patients with hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 158-163.

目的

为乙型肝炎肝硬化患者肝移植等待期构建多模式预康复优化项目,探讨其在临床实践中的应用效果。

方法

选取吉林大学第一医院移植中心2021年1月至10月等待行原位肝移植的乙型肝炎肝硬化患者为研究对象,以主要结局指标6分钟步行距离(6MWD)进行样本量估算,采用随机数字表法分为干预组和对照组。干预组48例患者接受为期4周的术前多模式预康复优化项目,包括运动训练、营养支持与心理护理。对照组45例患者接受肝移植等待期患者的术前常规护理方案。采用两独立样本t检验或χ2检验比较两组患者性别、手术年龄、营养风险筛查2002(NRS 2002)量表评分、终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分和术后住院时间,采用两独立样本t检验比较干预前、肝移植术前1 d及术后30 d两组患者6MWD、血清营养学指标(白蛋白和前白蛋白)及医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评分。P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者性别、手术年龄、NRS 2002量表评分和MELD评分差异均无统计学意义(χ2/t=0.022、0.389、0.194和-1.521,P均>0.05)。干预组和对照组患者术后住院时间分别为(12.7±1.1)、(17.3±2.3)d,差异有统计学意义(t=12.372,P<0.05)。干预组和对照组患者干预前6MWD、白蛋白、前白蛋白和HADS评分差异均无统计学意义(t=0.982、1.751、-1.124和-1.471,P均>0.05)。肝移植术前1 d,干预组患者6MWD、白蛋白、前白蛋白和HADS评分分别为(580±6)m、(40.01±4.32)g/L、(310.05±14.61)g/L和(6.4±1.2)分,均优于对照组(562±7)m、(35.53±3.41)g/L、(278.79±9.29)g/L和(11.3±1.8)分,差异均有统计学意义(t=13.502、5.527、12.388和-15.415,P均<0.05)。肝移植术后30 d,干预组患者6MWD、白蛋白、前白蛋白和HADS分别为(556±5)m、(35.37±4.99)g/L、(279.56±14.01)g/L和(6.8±1.2)分,均优于对照组(536±7)m、(31.90±4.75)g/L、(244.43±11.92)g/L和(11.4±1.8)分,差异均有统计学意义(t=15.122、3.424、12.982和-14.345,P均<0.05)。

结论

对乙型肝炎肝硬化肝移植等待期患者开展多模式预康复优化项目,可有效改善其围手术期活动能力、焦虑抑郁及营养状况,缩短术后住院时间,促进术后康复。

Objective

To construct a multimodal pre-rehabilitation optimization program in patients with hepatitis B virus-related live cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation, and to explore its application effect in clinical practice.

Methods

Patients with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis who were waiting for orthotopic liver transplantation in the Transplant Center of the First Hospital of Jilin University from January to October 2021 were enrolled as the study subjects. The sample size was estimated according to the main outcome of index 6 minutes walking distance (6MWD), and the patients were divided into the intervention group and the control group by random number table method. Forty-eight patients in the intervention group received a multimodal pre-rehabilitation optimization program for four weeks, including exercise training, nutritional support and psychological care. Forty-five patients in the control group received routine nursing plan while waiting for liver transplantation. Using two independent sample t tests or Chi-square test to compare the general data of the two groups of patients, such as sex, age of operation, nutrition risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) scale score, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and length of postoperative hospital stay. Using two independent samples t test to compare the 6MWD, serum nutritional science indicators (albumin and prealbumin) and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) score of the two groups of patients at different time points (before intervention, 1 day before liver transplantation and 30 days after surgery). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were no significant differences in sex, preoperative age, NRS 2002 scales score and MELD scores between the two groups (χ2/t=0.022、0.389、0.194 and -1.521, all P>0.05). The postoperative hospitalization time in the intervention group and the control group was (12.7±1.1) and (17.3±2.3) d, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (t=12.372, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in 6MWD, albumin, prealbumin and HADS scores between the intervention group and the control group before intervention (t=0.982, 1.751, -1.124 and -1.471, all P>0.05). The 6MWD, albumin, prealbumin, and HADS scores of the intervention group were (580±6) m, (40.01±4.32) g/L, (310.05±14.61) g/L, and (6.4±1.2) points 1 day before surgery, which were better than the control group [(562±7) m, (35.53±3.41) g/L, (278.79±9.29) g/L, and (11.3±1.8) points, respectively], and the differences were statistically significant (t=13.502, 5.527, 12.388 and -15.415, all P<0.05). On the 30th day after surgery, 6MWD, albumin, prealbumin, and HADS scores in the intervention group were (556±5) m, (35.37±4.99) g/L, (279.56±14.01) g/L and (6.8±1.2) points, which were better than those in the control group [(536±7) m, (31.90±4.75) g/L (244.43±11.92) g/L, and (11.4±1.8) points, respectively], and the differences were statistically significant (t=15.122, 3.424, 12.982 and -14.345, all P<0.05).

Conclusions

The multimode pre-rehabilitation optimization program for liver transplantation patients with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis in the waiting period can effectively improve the patients′ perioperative activity, anxiety, depression and nutritional status, shorten the length of postoperative hospital stay, and promote postoperative rehabilitation.

表1 对照组和干预组乙型肝炎肝硬化肝移植等待期患者一般资料比较
表2 干预组和对照组乙型肝炎肝硬化肝移植等待期患者不同时间6MWD、血清营养学指标和HADS评分比较(±s)
1
李海波,符洪源,陆桐宇,等. 肝移植领域2017年度重要进展盘点[J]. 器官移植2018, 9(1):41-50, 82.
2
Duarte-Rojo A, Ruiz-Margáin A, Montaño-Loza AJ, et al. Exercise and physical activity for patients with end-stage liver disease: improving functional status and sarcopenia while on the transplant waiting list[J]. Liver Transpl, 2018, 24(1):122-139.
3
Laube R, Wang H, Park L, et al. Frailty in advanced liver disease[J]. Liver Int, 2018, 38(12):2117-2128.
4
Prentis JM, Manas DM, Trenell MI, et al. Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts 90-day survival after liver transplantation[J]. Liver Transpl, 2012, 18(2):152-159.
5
Morkane CM, Kearney O, Bruce DA, et al. An outpatient hospital-based exercise training program for patients with crrhotic liver disease awaiting transplantation: a feasibility trial[J]. Transplantation, 2020, 104(1):97-103.
6
Wu JJ, Wu X, Yao GZ, et al. Application of exercised-based pre-rehabilitation in perioperative period of patients with gastric cancer[J]. Open Med, 2019, 14(1):875-882.
7
Awasthi R, Minnella EM, Ferreira V, et al. Supervised exercise training with multimodal prehabilitation leads to earlier functional recovery following colorectal cancer resection[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2019, 63(4):461-467.
8
Bates A, West MA, Jack S. Framework for prehabilitation services[J]. Br J Surg, 2020, 107(2):e11-e14.
9
中华医学会感染病学分会,中华医学会肝病学分会. 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2019年版) [J]. 中华临床感染病杂志2019, 12(6): 401-428.
10
中华医学会心血管病学分会,中国康复医学会心肺预防与康复专业委员会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 六分钟步行试验临床规范应用中国专家共识[J]. 中华心血管病杂志202250(5):432-442.
11
Gillis C, Li C, Lee L, et al. Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer[J]. Anesthesiology, 2014121(5):937-947.
12
邱田. 三联预康复策略对胸腔镜手术患者围术期功能状态及预后的影响[D]. 北京:北京协和医学院,2017.
13
Williams FR, Vallance A, Faulkner T, et al. Home-based exercise therapy in patients awaiting liver transplantation: protocol for an observational feasibility trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(1):e019298.
14
王苑,吕少诚,张雪静,等. 集束化管理预防肝移植患者术后肺部感染的效果[J]. 中国感染控制杂志2018, 17(12):1037-1041.
15
余思邈,朱云,王立福,等. 焦虑和抑郁状态对原发性肝癌患者免疫功能的影响[J]. 肝脏2018, 23(6): 496-498.
16
Brustia R, Savier E, Scatton O. Physical exercise in cirrhotic patients: towards prehabilitation on waiting list for liver transplantation. A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 2018, 42(3):205-215.
17
Román E, García-Galcerán C, Torrades T, et al. Effects of an exercise programme on functional capacity,body composition and risk of falls in patients with cirrhosis:a randomized clinical trial[J]. PLoS One, 201611(3):e0151652.
18
Zenith L, Meena N, Ramadi A, et al. Eight weeks of exercise training increases aerobic capacity and muscle mass and reduces fatigue in patients with cirrhosis[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2014, 12(11):1920-1926.
19
王茹真,陈莹丽,王志杰,等. 互联网联合预康复干预模式在慢性乙肝肝硬化患者中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志2021, 27(25):3491-3495.
20
Robinson TN, Wu DS, Pointer L, et al. Simple frailty score predicts postoperative complications across surgical specialties[J]. Am J Surg, 2013, 206(4):544-550.
21
Braga M, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, et al. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: surgery[J]. Clin Nutr, 2009, 28(4):378-386.
22
Li C, Carli F, Lee L, et al. Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(4):1072-1082.
23
Williams AM, Waits S, Englesbe MJ. The importance of prehabilitation in liver transplantation[J]. Curr Transpl Rep, 2015, 2(4):312-315.
24
Kruger C, McNeely ML, Bailey RJ, et al. Home exercise training improves exercise capacity in cirrhosis patients: role of exercise adherence[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1):99.
25
王森岩,丁蕾蕾,刘龙,等. 肝移植受者的营养评价与管理[J/CD]. 实用器官移植电子杂志2019, 7(6):437-441.
26
Plauth M, Merli M, Kondrup J, et al. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition in liver disease and transplantation[J]. Clin Nutr, 1997, 16(2):43-55.
27
中国康复医学会康养工作专家委员会. 中国老年人肌少症临床康复治疗指南[J]. 加速康复外科杂志20225(1):1-7.
28
Duarte-Rojo A, Ruiz-Margáin A, Montaño-Loza AJ, et al. Exercise and physical activity for patients with end-stage liver disease: improving functional status and sarcopenia while on the transplant waiting list[J]. Liver Transpl, 2018, 24(1):122-139.
29
邱田,刘子嘉,黄宇光,等. 预康复在加速术后康复中价值[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志2018, 34(3):296-298.
[1] 白浪, 张雪玉, 白铁成, 贺爱军. 腹腔镜近端胃切除术中圆锥形重叠吻合成形术对Siewert Ⅱ型AEG患者胃食管反流、营养状态的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 679-682.
[2] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[3] 仲福顺, 余露, 范晓礼, 叶啟发. 肝移植治疗肝上皮样血管内皮瘤一例[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 293-297.
[4] 刘冉佳, 崔向丽, 周效竹, 曲伟, 朱志军. 儿童肝移植受者健康相关生存质量评价的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 302-309.
[5] 贺健, 张骊, 王洪海, 蒋文涛. 肝移植术后脾功能亢进转归及治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 310-314.
[6] 胡宁宁, 赵延荣, 王栋, 王胜亮, 郭源. FMNL3与肝细胞癌肝移植受者预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 283-288.
[7] 王铭池, 梁乐琦, 刘永达. 基于NHANES数据库分析血脂与肾结石之间的关系[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 485-490.
[8] 魏志鸿, 刘建勇, 吴小雅, 杨芳, 吕立志, 江艺, 蔡秋程. 肝移植术后急性移植物抗宿主病的诊治(附四例报告)[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 846-851.
[9] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[10] 傅斌生, 冯啸, 杨卿, 曾凯宁, 姚嘉, 唐晖, 刘剑戎, 魏绪霞, 易慧敏, 易述红, 陈规划, 杨扬. 脂肪变性供肝在成人劈离式肝移植中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 789-794.
[11] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组, 中华医学会外科学分会移植学组, 华南劈离式肝移植联盟. 劈离式供肝儿童肝移植中国临床操作指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 593-601.
[12] 刘军, 丘文静, 孙方昊, 李松盈, 易述红, 傅斌生, 杨扬, 罗慧. 在体与离体劈离式肝移植在儿童肝移植中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 688-693.
[13] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[14] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[15] 宋燕秋, 戚桂艳, 杨双双, 周萍. 重症急性胰腺炎肠道菌群特征及早期肠内营养联合微生态制剂治疗的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 442-447.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?