切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03): 158 -163. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2023.03.006

论著

乙型肝炎肝硬化患者肝移植等待期应用多模式预康复优化项目的临床研究
雷雪雪, 于颖, 李虹彦()   
  1. 130021 长春,吉林大学第一医院放疗科
    130021 长春,吉林大学第一医院肝胆胰外一科
    130021 长春,吉林大学第一医院护理部
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-19 出版日期:2023-06-25
  • 通信作者: 李虹彦
  • 基金资助:
    吉林大学第一医院2020年护理科研基金(20200202)

Clinical research of multimodal prehabilitation optimization program in patients with hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation

Xuexue Lei, Ying Yu, Hongyan Li()   

  1. Department of Radiotherapy, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
    Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
    Department of Nursing, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
  • Received:2022-09-19 Published:2023-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Hongyan Li
目的

为乙型肝炎肝硬化患者肝移植等待期构建多模式预康复优化项目,探讨其在临床实践中的应用效果。

方法

选取吉林大学第一医院移植中心2021年1月至10月等待行原位肝移植的乙型肝炎肝硬化患者为研究对象,以主要结局指标6分钟步行距离(6MWD)进行样本量估算,采用随机数字表法分为干预组和对照组。干预组48例患者接受为期4周的术前多模式预康复优化项目,包括运动训练、营养支持与心理护理。对照组45例患者接受肝移植等待期患者的术前常规护理方案。采用两独立样本t检验或χ2检验比较两组患者性别、手术年龄、营养风险筛查2002(NRS 2002)量表评分、终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分和术后住院时间,采用两独立样本t检验比较干预前、肝移植术前1 d及术后30 d两组患者6MWD、血清营养学指标(白蛋白和前白蛋白)及医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评分。P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

两组患者性别、手术年龄、NRS 2002量表评分和MELD评分差异均无统计学意义(χ2/t=0.022、0.389、0.194和-1.521,P均>0.05)。干预组和对照组患者术后住院时间分别为(12.7±1.1)、(17.3±2.3)d,差异有统计学意义(t=12.372,P<0.05)。干预组和对照组患者干预前6MWD、白蛋白、前白蛋白和HADS评分差异均无统计学意义(t=0.982、1.751、-1.124和-1.471,P均>0.05)。肝移植术前1 d,干预组患者6MWD、白蛋白、前白蛋白和HADS评分分别为(580±6)m、(40.01±4.32)g/L、(310.05±14.61)g/L和(6.4±1.2)分,均优于对照组(562±7)m、(35.53±3.41)g/L、(278.79±9.29)g/L和(11.3±1.8)分,差异均有统计学意义(t=13.502、5.527、12.388和-15.415,P均<0.05)。肝移植术后30 d,干预组患者6MWD、白蛋白、前白蛋白和HADS分别为(556±5)m、(35.37±4.99)g/L、(279.56±14.01)g/L和(6.8±1.2)分,均优于对照组(536±7)m、(31.90±4.75)g/L、(244.43±11.92)g/L和(11.4±1.8)分,差异均有统计学意义(t=15.122、3.424、12.982和-14.345,P均<0.05)。

结论

对乙型肝炎肝硬化肝移植等待期患者开展多模式预康复优化项目,可有效改善其围手术期活动能力、焦虑抑郁及营养状况,缩短术后住院时间,促进术后康复。

Objective

To construct a multimodal pre-rehabilitation optimization program in patients with hepatitis B virus-related live cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation, and to explore its application effect in clinical practice.

Methods

Patients with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis who were waiting for orthotopic liver transplantation in the Transplant Center of the First Hospital of Jilin University from January to October 2021 were enrolled as the study subjects. The sample size was estimated according to the main outcome of index 6 minutes walking distance (6MWD), and the patients were divided into the intervention group and the control group by random number table method. Forty-eight patients in the intervention group received a multimodal pre-rehabilitation optimization program for four weeks, including exercise training, nutritional support and psychological care. Forty-five patients in the control group received routine nursing plan while waiting for liver transplantation. Using two independent sample t tests or Chi-square test to compare the general data of the two groups of patients, such as sex, age of operation, nutrition risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) scale score, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and length of postoperative hospital stay. Using two independent samples t test to compare the 6MWD, serum nutritional science indicators (albumin and prealbumin) and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) score of the two groups of patients at different time points (before intervention, 1 day before liver transplantation and 30 days after surgery). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were no significant differences in sex, preoperative age, NRS 2002 scales score and MELD scores between the two groups (χ2/t=0.022、0.389、0.194 and -1.521, all P>0.05). The postoperative hospitalization time in the intervention group and the control group was (12.7±1.1) and (17.3±2.3) d, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (t=12.372, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in 6MWD, albumin, prealbumin and HADS scores between the intervention group and the control group before intervention (t=0.982, 1.751, -1.124 and -1.471, all P>0.05). The 6MWD, albumin, prealbumin, and HADS scores of the intervention group were (580±6) m, (40.01±4.32) g/L, (310.05±14.61) g/L, and (6.4±1.2) points 1 day before surgery, which were better than the control group [(562±7) m, (35.53±3.41) g/L, (278.79±9.29) g/L, and (11.3±1.8) points, respectively], and the differences were statistically significant (t=13.502, 5.527, 12.388 and -15.415, all P<0.05). On the 30th day after surgery, 6MWD, albumin, prealbumin, and HADS scores in the intervention group were (556±5) m, (35.37±4.99) g/L, (279.56±14.01) g/L and (6.8±1.2) points, which were better than those in the control group [(536±7) m, (31.90±4.75) g/L (244.43±11.92) g/L, and (11.4±1.8) points, respectively], and the differences were statistically significant (t=15.122, 3.424, 12.982 and -14.345, all P<0.05).

Conclusions

The multimode pre-rehabilitation optimization program for liver transplantation patients with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis in the waiting period can effectively improve the patients′ perioperative activity, anxiety, depression and nutritional status, shorten the length of postoperative hospital stay, and promote postoperative rehabilitation.

表1 对照组和干预组乙型肝炎肝硬化肝移植等待期患者一般资料比较
表2 干预组和对照组乙型肝炎肝硬化肝移植等待期患者不同时间6MWD、血清营养学指标和HADS评分比较(±s)
1
李海波,符洪源,陆桐宇,等. 肝移植领域2017年度重要进展盘点[J]. 器官移植2018, 9(1):41-50, 82.
2
Duarte-Rojo A, Ruiz-Margáin A, Montaño-Loza AJ, et al. Exercise and physical activity for patients with end-stage liver disease: improving functional status and sarcopenia while on the transplant waiting list[J]. Liver Transpl, 2018, 24(1):122-139.
3
Laube R, Wang H, Park L, et al. Frailty in advanced liver disease[J]. Liver Int, 2018, 38(12):2117-2128.
4
Prentis JM, Manas DM, Trenell MI, et al. Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts 90-day survival after liver transplantation[J]. Liver Transpl, 2012, 18(2):152-159.
5
Morkane CM, Kearney O, Bruce DA, et al. An outpatient hospital-based exercise training program for patients with crrhotic liver disease awaiting transplantation: a feasibility trial[J]. Transplantation, 2020, 104(1):97-103.
6
Wu JJ, Wu X, Yao GZ, et al. Application of exercised-based pre-rehabilitation in perioperative period of patients with gastric cancer[J]. Open Med, 2019, 14(1):875-882.
7
Awasthi R, Minnella EM, Ferreira V, et al. Supervised exercise training with multimodal prehabilitation leads to earlier functional recovery following colorectal cancer resection[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2019, 63(4):461-467.
8
Bates A, West MA, Jack S. Framework for prehabilitation services[J]. Br J Surg, 2020, 107(2):e11-e14.
9
中华医学会感染病学分会,中华医学会肝病学分会. 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2019年版) [J]. 中华临床感染病杂志2019, 12(6): 401-428.
10
中华医学会心血管病学分会,中国康复医学会心肺预防与康复专业委员会,中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 六分钟步行试验临床规范应用中国专家共识[J]. 中华心血管病杂志202250(5):432-442.
11
Gillis C, Li C, Lee L, et al. Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer[J]. Anesthesiology, 2014121(5):937-947.
12
邱田. 三联预康复策略对胸腔镜手术患者围术期功能状态及预后的影响[D]. 北京:北京协和医学院,2017.
13
Williams FR, Vallance A, Faulkner T, et al. Home-based exercise therapy in patients awaiting liver transplantation: protocol for an observational feasibility trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(1):e019298.
14
王苑,吕少诚,张雪静,等. 集束化管理预防肝移植患者术后肺部感染的效果[J]. 中国感染控制杂志2018, 17(12):1037-1041.
15
余思邈,朱云,王立福,等. 焦虑和抑郁状态对原发性肝癌患者免疫功能的影响[J]. 肝脏2018, 23(6): 496-498.
16
Brustia R, Savier E, Scatton O. Physical exercise in cirrhotic patients: towards prehabilitation on waiting list for liver transplantation. A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol, 2018, 42(3):205-215.
17
Román E, García-Galcerán C, Torrades T, et al. Effects of an exercise programme on functional capacity,body composition and risk of falls in patients with cirrhosis:a randomized clinical trial[J]. PLoS One, 201611(3):e0151652.
18
Zenith L, Meena N, Ramadi A, et al. Eight weeks of exercise training increases aerobic capacity and muscle mass and reduces fatigue in patients with cirrhosis[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2014, 12(11):1920-1926.
19
王茹真,陈莹丽,王志杰,等. 互联网联合预康复干预模式在慢性乙肝肝硬化患者中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志2021, 27(25):3491-3495.
20
Robinson TN, Wu DS, Pointer L, et al. Simple frailty score predicts postoperative complications across surgical specialties[J]. Am J Surg, 2013, 206(4):544-550.
21
Braga M, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, et al. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: surgery[J]. Clin Nutr, 2009, 28(4):378-386.
22
Li C, Carli F, Lee L, et al. Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(4):1072-1082.
23
Williams AM, Waits S, Englesbe MJ. The importance of prehabilitation in liver transplantation[J]. Curr Transpl Rep, 2015, 2(4):312-315.
24
Kruger C, McNeely ML, Bailey RJ, et al. Home exercise training improves exercise capacity in cirrhosis patients: role of exercise adherence[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1):99.
25
王森岩,丁蕾蕾,刘龙,等. 肝移植受者的营养评价与管理[J/CD]. 实用器官移植电子杂志2019, 7(6):437-441.
26
Plauth M, Merli M, Kondrup J, et al. ESPEN guidelines for nutrition in liver disease and transplantation[J]. Clin Nutr, 1997, 16(2):43-55.
27
中国康复医学会康养工作专家委员会. 中国老年人肌少症临床康复治疗指南[J]. 加速康复外科杂志20225(1):1-7.
28
Duarte-Rojo A, Ruiz-Margáin A, Montaño-Loza AJ, et al. Exercise and physical activity for patients with end-stage liver disease: improving functional status and sarcopenia while on the transplant waiting list[J]. Liver Transpl, 2018, 24(1):122-139.
29
邱田,刘子嘉,黄宇光,等. 预康复在加速术后康复中价值[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志2018, 34(3):296-298.
[1] 王友芳, 李兴超, 朱晓松, 刘清敏, 张建国, 杨淑红, 相然, 张蒙蒙, 车峰远. 预后营养指数对急性颅内动脉粥样硬化性大血管闭塞患者预后评估价值分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 193-197.
[2] 尹朱丹, 王昱, 镇坷, 许彬, 田雅丽, 童孜蓉. 早期低热量肠内营养对危重症患者预后影响的Meta分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 215-222.
[3] 郭洪海, 胡奕炀, 田园, 庞悦, 杨家轩, 杨沛刚, 丁平安, 赵群. 经鼻空肠营养管置入技术在全达芬奇机器人胃癌根治术中的应用:附视频[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 193-196.
[4] 赵群. 经鼻空肠营养管置入技术在全达芬奇机器人胃癌根治术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 230-230.
[5] 尹宏祥, 段家康, 江博文, 谈燚. 全身免疫炎症指数联合预后营养指数对接受根治性切除术的肝细胞癌的预后价值研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 93-98.
[6] 徐烨, 李婧, 刘冉佳, 潘晨, 郭明星, 崔向丽. 2017至2021年中国95家医疗机构肝移植术后免疫抑制剂用药分析[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 134-139.
[7] 石晓萍, 老东辉, 王菁, 吕迁洲, 李晓宇, 许青. 重症监护病房肝移植受者的药物相关问题[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 104-111.
[8] 黄明珠, 陆鹰, 何康, 王艳. 儿童肝移植受者出院后服药依从性现状调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 112-117.
[9] 徐欣轶, 薛蓓, 蒋莉, 陈慧. NRI联合CFS评分对肺癌术后机械通气的预测分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 358-360.
[10] 王晓东, 汪恺, 葛昭, 丁忠祥, 徐骁. 计算机视觉技术在肝癌肝移植疗效提升中的研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 361-366.
[11] 朱青, 马洁, 戴尧, 庞明泉, 樊海宁, 崔红元. 多房棘球蚴病患者营养评估及干预措施[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 356-359.
[12] 中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组, 中华医学会外科学分会移植学组, 华南劈离式肝移植联盟. 劈离式肝移植血管分割与重建中国专家共识[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 167-172.
[13] 郭晋朝, 张新杰, 杨璐, 王贵玲. 间歇经口至食管管饲联合吞咽训练对脑卒中吞咽障碍患者营养状态和预后的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 102-107.
[14] 屠松霞, 郑红艳, 朱姝, 徐夏君. 食管癌术后患者肠内营养耐受不良的影响因素及列线图风险模型[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 73-77.
[15] 高山, 董有静. 老年外科患者虚弱研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 343-348.
阅读次数
全文


摘要