切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01) : 17 -21. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2024.01.004

论著

肾移植受者围手术期霉酚酸暴露量及不良反应分析
吴小山1, 任桂灵2, 朱杰东3, 史天陆1, 马葵芬3,()   
  1. 1. 230001 合肥,中国科学技术大学附属第一医院(安徽省立医院)药学部 精准药物制剂与临床药学安徽省重点实验室
    2. 230031 合肥,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇一医院药剂科
    3. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院临床药学部
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-08 出版日期:2024-02-25
  • 通信作者: 马葵芬
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省药学会科研资助项目(2022ZYYL04)

Analysis of the exposure and adverse reactions of mycophenolic acid in patients during the perioperative period after renal transplantation

Xiaoshan Wu1, Guiling Ren2, Jiedong Zhu3, Tianlu Shi1, Kuifen Ma3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Pharmacy, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Pharmaceutical Preparations and Clinical Pharmacy, Hefei 230001, China
    2. Department of Pharmacy, the 901 Hospital of Chinese People, Liberation Army Joint Service Support Unit, Hefei 230031, China
    3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
  • Received:2023-10-08 Published:2024-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Kuifen Ma
引用本文:

吴小山, 任桂灵, 朱杰东, 史天陆, 马葵芬. 肾移植受者围手术期霉酚酸暴露量及不良反应分析[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 17-21.

Xiaoshan Wu, Guiling Ren, Jiedong Zhu, Tianlu Shi, Kuifen Ma. Analysis of the exposure and adverse reactions of mycophenolic acid in patients during the perioperative period after renal transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 17-21.

目的

分析肾移植受者围手术期霉酚酸(MPA)血药浓度监测结果和不良反应发生情况,以促进临床合理用药。

方法

回顾性分析2022年10月1日至11月31日浙江大学医学院附属第一医院肾移植围手术期受者临床资料。52例受者均于肾移植术后第2天开始监测MPA血药浓度谷值(C0),其中29例于肾移植术后第4天监测MPA血药浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)。通过医院信息系统收集其年龄、性别、MPA-C0和MPA-AUC监测结果、白细胞水平以及腹泻和排斥反应发生情况等信息。两组间比较采用独立样本t检验,P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

52例肾移植受者术后监测MPA-C0平均为(4.1±2.3)mg/L,其中1.0~3.5 mg/L 24例(46.15%),>3.5 mg/L 28例(53.85%)。29例受者MPA-AUC平均为(54±23)mg·h-1·L-1,其中30~60 mg·h-1·L-1 14例(48.28%),<30 mg·h-1·L-1 5例(17.24%),>60 mg·h-1·L-1 10例(34.48%)。女性受者(n=9)MPA-AUC高于男性(n=20),分别为(68±16)和(48±23)mg·h-1·L-1,差异有统计学意义(t=-2.31,P<0.05)。29例监测MPA-AUC肾移植受者中19例使用吗替麦考酚酯(MMF),10例使用麦考酚钠肠溶片(EC-MPS),MMF和EC-MPS AUC分别为(53±26)和(57±15)mg·h-1·L-1,差异无统计学意义(t=0.46,P>0.05)。52例肾移植受者围手术期均未发生排斥反应。1例(1.92%)受者于肾移植术后第21天发生粒细胞减少。6例(11.54%)受者发生腹泻,在减少MPA剂量和使用蒙脱石散对症处理后症状缓解。

结论

肾移植受者围手术期MPA暴露量差异较大,近半数受者MPA暴露量不符合指南要求。MPA不良反应发生率相对较低,较高的MPA暴露量与受者不良反应无关。

Objective

This study aimed to analyze the mycophenolic acid (MPA) blood concentration in patients during the perioperative period after kidney transplantation and to observe the adverse reactions to MPA to promote rational clinical medication.

Methods

The clinical data of perioperative recipients after kidney transplantation at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from October 1 to November 31, 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. MPA- concentration of 0 h (C0) were monitored in fifty-two recipients beginning on the second day after the operation. The MPA-area under curve (AUC) was monitored for 29 recipients on the fourth day after the operation. Patient information about age, sex, MPA-C0, MPA-AUC, white blood cell levels, incidence of diarrhea and rejection was collected through the hospital information system. Independent sample t-test was used for comparisons between two groups, and P<0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

Results

The average MPA-C0 in 52 kidney transplant recipients was (4.1±2.3) mg/L, with 24 (46.15%) ranging from 1.0 to 3.5 mg/L and 28 (53.85%) exceeding 3.5 mg/L. The average MPA-AUC of 29 recipients was (54±23) mg·h-1·L-1, including 14 patients (48.28%) receiving 30-60 mg·h-1·L-1, 5 patients (17.24%) receiving less than 30 mg·h-1·L-1, and 10 patients (34.48%) receiving more than 60 mg·h-1·L-1. The MPA-AUC of female recipients (n=9) was higher than that of male recipients (n=20), with values of (68±16) and (48±23) mg·h-1·L-1, respectively (t=-2.31, P<0.05). Among the 29 recipients for whom the MPA-AUC was monitored, 19 used mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and 10 used enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). The AUC of MMF and EC-MPS were (53±26) and (57±15) mg·h-1·L-1, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (t=0.46, P >0.05). None of the recipients experienced any rejection reactions during the perioperative period. One (1.92%) of the recipients experienced granulocytopenia on the 21st day after kidney transplantation. Six (11.54%) of the recipients experienced diarrhea, and symptoms improved after reducing the dosage of MPA and symptomatic treatment with montmorillonite powder.

Conclusions

There was a significant difference in MPA exposure levels among recipients during the perioperative period after kidney transplantation, with nearly half of the recipients not meeting the guidelines. The incidence of adverse reactions to MPA was relatively low, and higher exposure to MPA was not related to adverse reactions in recipients.

图1 29例监测MPA-AUC肾移植受者MMF和EC-MPS血药浓度-时间曲线图注:MMF.吗替麦考酚酯;EC-MPS.麦考酚钠肠溶片
1
中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肾移植排斥反应临床诊疗技术规范(2019版)[J]. 器官移植2019, 10(5): 505-512.
2
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients[J]. Am J Transplant, 2009, 9(Suppl 3): S1-S155.
3
Wang XD, Qin X, Wang Y, et al. Controlled-dose versus fixed-dose mycophenolate mofetil for kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Transplantation, 2013, 96(4): 361-367.
4
中华医学会器官移植学分会. 器官移植免疫抑制剂临床应用技术规范(2019版)[J]. 器官移植2019, 10(3): 213-226.
5
中华医学会器官移植学分会,中国医师协会器官移植医师分会. 中国肾移植受者免疫抑制治疗指南(2016版)[J]. 器官移植2016, 7(5): 1-5.
6
曾维胜,李珍,宋秘,等. 性别对肾移植受体霉酚酸血药浓度影响的临床分析[J]. 器官移植2018, 9(5): 385-389.
7
中华医学会器官移植学分会,中国医师协会器官移植医师分会,上海医药行业协会. 中国肝、肾移植受者霉酚酸类药物应用专家共识(2023版)[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版2023, 17(5): 257-272.
8
Savvidaki E, Papachristou E, Kazakopoulos P, et al. Gastrointestinal disorders after renal transplantation[J]. Transplant Proc, 2014, 46(9): 3183-3186.
9
Xia ZW, Jun CY, Hao C, et al. The occurrence of diarrhea not related to the pharmacokinetics of MPA and its metabolites in liver transplant patients[J]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2010, 66(7): 671-679.
10
van Gelder T, Silva HT, de Fijter JW, et al. Comparing mycophenolate mofetil regimens for de novo renal transplant recipients: the fixed-dose concentration-controlled trial[J]. Transplantation, 2008, 86(8):1043-1051.
11
Gourishankar S, Houde I, Keown PA, et al. The CLEAR study: a 5-day, 3-g loading dose of mycophenolate mofetil versus standard 2-g dosing in renal transplantation[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2010, 5(7): 1282-1289.
12
Bauer AC, Franco RF, Manfro RC. Immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: state of the art and current protocols[J]. Curr Pharm Des, 2020, 26(28): 3440-3450.
13
杨其顺,张琳,托娅,等. 吗替麦考酚酯相关性胃肠炎研究进展[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版2021, 15 (1): 55-59.
14
Krall P, Yañez D, Rojo A, et al. CYP3A5 and UGT1A9 polymorphisms influence immunosuppressive therapy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2021, 12(1):1-9.
15
Wu B, Kulkarni K, Basu S, et al. First-pass metabolism via UDP-glucuronosyltransferase: a barrier to oral bioavailability of phenolics[J]. J Pharm Sci, 2011, 100(9): 3655-3681.
16
张杰,成富民,朱昆仑,等. 不同霉酚酸剂型在儿童肾移植不同年龄段的暴露差异[J]. 器官移植2022, 13(3):356-362.
17
Staatz CE, Tett SE. Pharmacology and toxicology of mycophenolate in organ transplant recipients: an update[J]. Arch Toxicol, 2014, 88(7): 1351-1389.
18
马葵芬,吕军好,余献平,等. 肾移植围手术期腹泻发生情况及危险素分析[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版2021, 15 (2): 77-80.
19
冯丽娟,杨春兰,夏泉,等. 免疫抑制剂血药浓度与肾移植术后腹泻的关联性分析[J]. 安徽医学2018, 39(12): 1446-1449.
[1] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[2] 王哲, 陈杨, 徐京杭, 李六亿, 樊亚楠, 纪童童, 胡可, 高慧, 于岩岩. 1 349例肠道门诊患者院前抗菌药物使用情况调查[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 19-26.
[3] 张心怡, 吕军好, 陈大进. 2023年肾移植领域研究进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 7-11.
[4] 师帅, 马文星, 陈昕, 单良, 王泽正, 段降龙, 吴云桦. 腹壁切口疝围手术期并发症发生危险因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 83-88.
[5] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[6] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[7] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[8] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[9] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[10] 朱垒, 汪斌, 张爱民, 陈晓燕, 张艳冰, 齐浩龙. 小剂量地塞米松在腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆道探查围手术期中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 339-343.
[11] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[12] 黄瑞, 王玉萍, 孙倩, 侯晓红. ICU患者肠内营养并发腹泻最佳证据的审查指标及障碍因素分析[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 38-41.
[13] 孙瑞雪, 朱莉, 刘文莉. 腹泻儿童用药依从性、用药态度现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 72-76.
[14] 张秋玥, 程羽, 牛雨田, 唐茂芝, 张克勤, 张懿, 郭亚楠, 涂增. 肾移植与人体微生态的相关性研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 207-213.
[15] 阮莎, 王盈盈, 杜健, 邱晓珏. 内镜下贲门缩窄日间手术围手术期个体化护理体会[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 65-66.
阅读次数
全文


摘要