切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04) : 236 -241. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2026.04.003

论著

减量糖皮质激素联合优化治疗在肾移植后IgA肾病中的疗效与安全性分析
杨华, 熊睿, 万里松, 陈同长, 杨锦然, 罗文峰, 李新长†()   
  1. 330000 南昌,江西省人民医院(南昌医学院第一附属医院)器官移植科 器官移植江西省重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-30 出版日期:2026-08-25
  • 通信作者: 李新长
  • 基金资助:
    江西省科技厅自然科学基金(20202BAB206015); 江西省教育厅科技项目(GJJ200212); 国家自然科学基金(81460147)

Efficacy and safety analysis of reduced-dose glucocorticoids combined with optimized therapy in immunoglobulin A nephropathy after kidney transplantation

Hua Yang, Rui Xiong, Lisong Wan, Tongchang Chen, Jinran Yang, Wenfeng Luo, Xinchang Li†()   

  1. Department of Organ Transplantation, Jiangxi Provincial People′s Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College), Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Nanchang 330000, China
  • Received:2025-08-30 Published:2026-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Xinchang Li
引用本文:

杨华, 熊睿, 万里松, 陈同长, 杨锦然, 罗文峰, 李新长. 减量糖皮质激素联合优化治疗在肾移植后IgA肾病中的疗效与安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 236-241.

Hua Yang, Rui Xiong, Lisong Wan, Tongchang Chen, Jinran Yang, Wenfeng Luo, Xinchang Li. Efficacy and safety analysis of reduced-dose glucocorticoids combined with optimized therapy in immunoglobulin A nephropathy after kidney transplantation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(04): 236-241.

目的

探讨减量糖皮质激素联合优化支持治疗对肾移植术后IgA肾病(IgAN)患者肾功能和蛋白尿的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2021年9月至2024年12月江西省人民医院36例经活检确诊为移植后IgAN患者资料,按是否采取减量糖皮质激素治疗方案,将其分为减量激素组(n=17)和对照组(n=19)。对照组仅采用优化支持治疗;减量激素组在优化支持治疗基础上使用减量泼尼松(0.5 mg·kg-1·d-1),持续8周,之后每月递减5 mg,6个月后至10 mg/d长期维持。比较两组患者治疗前后血清肌酐(Scr)、24 h尿蛋白和移植肾存活率。呈正态分布和非正态分布的计量资料分别采用t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行比较,计数资料采用Pearson卡方检验或Fisher确切概率法进行比较,比值比(OR)用于评估相对风险;使用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,并采用log-rank检验比较生存率。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

两组IgAN患者发生IgAN时年龄、性别、供肾类型、供者年龄、HLA错配数、ATG诱导治疗比例、肾移植后IgAN确诊时间、牛津分级评分及确诊时Scr、24 h蛋白尿水平差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。随访至2025年6月,减量激素组Scr低于对照组[(117.8±30.2)和(156.7±19.2)μmol/L],差异有统计学意义(t=4.248,P<0.05);24 h尿蛋白亦显著下降[0.5(0.2~1.6)和1.5(0.3~2.7)g/d],差异有统计学意义(Z=83.0,P<0.05);且24 h蛋白尿<0.3 g/d的比例较高(8/17和4/19),但差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.731,P>0.05),OR=3.33(95%CI:0.78~14.31)。对照组治疗前后Scr和24 h尿蛋白水平差异均无统计学意义(t/Z=-0.152/197.0,P均>0.05)。减量激素组治疗后Scr和24 h尿蛋白水平均低于治疗前,差异均有统计学意义(t/Z=2.125/32.0,P均<0.05)。减量激素组3例出现高血糖、2例轻度肺部感染,均经治疗后恢复;对照组未发生不良反应。减量激素组和对照组3年移植物累计存活率分别为92.9%和81.4%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.522,P>0.05)。

结论

减量糖皮质激素联合优化支持治疗可显著改善肾移植术后IgAN患者肾功能和蛋白尿,且不良反应可控。

Objective

To investigate the effects of low-dose glucocorticoid combined with optimized supportive therapy on renal function and proteinuria in patients with recurrent or de novo IgA nephropathy (IgAN) after kidney transplantation.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 36 patients with biopsy-confirmed post-transplant IgAN at Jiangxi Provincial People′s Hospital from September 2021 to December 2024. Based on whether a low-dose glucocorticoid regimen was administered, the patients were divided into the low-dose glucocorticoid group (n=17) and the control group (n=19). The control group received optimized supportive therapy alone. The low-dose glucocorticoid group received low-dose prednisone (0.5 mg·kg-1·d-1) for 8 weeks on top of the optimized supportive therapy, followed by a monthly reduction of 5 mg, until a long-term maintenance dose of 10 mg/d was reached after 6 months. Serum creatinine (Scr), 24-hour urinary protein, and allograft survival rates before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. Normally and non-normally distributed quantitative data were compared using the Student′s t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Categorical data were compared using the Pearson′s chi-square test or Fisher′s exact test. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to assess relative risk. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival rates were compared using the log-rank test. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in baseline parameters including age, sex, donor type, donor age, number of HLA mismatches, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction therapy, time from transplantation to biopsy, Oxford classification pathological scores, and baseline levels of Scr and 24-hour proteinuria at the time of biopsy (t/χ2/Z=-0.786, 0.001, 0.001, -0.485, 0.571, 0.358, 159, -0.786, 0.001, 0.001, -0.485, 0.571, 0.358, 159, all P>0.05). At the end of follow-up, the Scr level in the low-dose glucocorticoid group was significantly lower than that in the control group [(117.8±30.2) vs. (156.7±19.2) μmol/L, t=4.248, P<0.05]. The 24-hour urinary protein also decreased significantly [0.5 (0.2-1.6) vs. 1.5 (0.3-2.7) g/d, Z=83, P<0.05]. The proportion of patients achieving 24-hour proteinuria <0.3 g/d was higher in the low-dose glucocorticoid group than in the control group (8/17 vs. 4/19), though the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=2.731, P>0.05), with an OR of 3.33 (95%CI: 0.78-14.31). In the control group, there were no significant changes in Scr and 24-hour urinary protein levels before and after treatment (t/Z=-0.152/197, all P>0.05). In contrast, the Scr and 24-hour urinary protein levels in the low-dose glucocorticoid group after treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment (t/Z=2.125/32, all P<0.05). In the low-dose glucocorticoid group, 3 cases of hyperglycemia and 2 cases of mild pulmonary infection occurred, all of which recovered after management; no adverse reactions occurred in the control group. The 3-year cumulative allograft survival rates in the low-dose glucocorticoid group and the control group were 92.9% and 81.4%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (χ2=0.522, P>0.05).

Conclusions

Low-dose glucocorticoid combined with optimized supportive therapy can significantly improve renal function and proteinuria control in patients with IgAN after kidney transplantation, and the adverse reactions are manageable.

表1 减量激素组和对照组IgA肾病患者一般资料比较
表2 减量激素组和对照组IgA肾病患者移植肾牛津分型评分比较(例)
表3 减量激素组和对照组IgA肾病患者治疗前后疗效比较
图1 减量激素组和对照组IgA肾病患者移植肾生存曲线
1
Rodrigues JC, Haas M, Reich HN. IgA nephropathy[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 368(25): 2402-2414.
2
Berthoux FC, Mohey H, Afiani A. Natural history of primary IgA nephropathy[J]. Semin Nephrol, 2008, 28(1): 4-9.
3
Moroni G, Longhi S, Quaglini S, et al. The long-term outcome of renal transplantation of IgA nephropathy and the impact of recurrence on graft survival[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2013, 28(5): 1305-1314.
4
Mulay AV, van Walraven C, Knoll GA. Impact of immunosuppressive medication on the risk of renal allograft failure due to recurrent glomerulonephritis[J]. Am J Transplant, 2009, 9(4): 804-811.
5
Disease K, Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerulonephritis Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis[J]. Kidney Int, 2012, (Suppl 2): S139-S274.
6
Ng R. Fish oil therapy in recurrent IgA nephropathy[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2003, 138(12): 1011-1012.
7
Pozzi C, Andrulli S, Del Vecchio L, et al. Corticosteroid effectiveness in IgA nephropathy: long-term results of a randomized, controlled trial[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004, 15(1): 157-163.
8
Clayton P, McDonald S, Chadban S. Steroids and recurrent IgA nephropathy after kidney transplantation[J]. Am J Transplant, 2011, 11(8): 1645-1649.
9
Kukla A, Chen E, Spong R, et al. Recurrent glomerulonephritis under rapid discontinuation of steroids[J]. Transplantation, 2011, 91(12): 1386-1391.
10
Messina M, di Vico MC, Ariaudo C, et al. Treatment protocol with pulse and oral steroids for IgA Nephropathy after kidney transplantation[J]. J Nephrol, 2016, 29(4): 575-583.
11
Matsukuma Y, Masutani K, Tsuchimoto A, et al. Effect of steroid pulse therapy on post-transplant immunoglobulin A nephropathy[J]. Nephrology (Carlton), 2018, 23(Suppl 2): 10-16.
12
Lv J, Wong MG, Hladunewich MA, et al. Effect of oral methylprednisolone on decline in kidney function or kidney failure in patients with IgA nephropathy: the TESTING randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2022, 327(19): 1888-1898.
13
Wong MG, Lv J, Hladunewich MA, et al. The therapeutic evaluation of steroids in IgA nephropathy global (TESTING) study: trial design and baseline characteristics[J]. Am J Nephrol, 2021, 52(10-11): 827-836.
14
Working Group of the International IgA Nephropathy Network and the Renal Pathology Society; Cattran DC, Coppo R, Cook HT, et al. The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: rationale, clinicopathological correlations, and classification[J]. Kidney Int, 2009, 76(5): 534-545.
15
Trimarchi H, Barratt J, Cattran DC, et al. Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy 2016: an update from the IgA Nephropathy Classification Working Group[J]. Kidney Int, 2017, 91(5): 1014-1021.
16
中国医药卫生文化协会肾病与血液净化专业委员会. 原发性IgA肾病管理和治疗中国专家共识[J/CD]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志,2024, 13(1): 1-8.
17
Han HS, Lubetzky ML, Anandasivam NS, et al. Recurrent immunoglobulin A nephropathy after kidney transplant - an updated review[J]. Transplantology, 2023, 4(3): 161-177.
18
Wyld ML, Chadban SJ. Recurrent IgA nephropathy after kidney transplantation[J]. Transplantation, 2016, 100(9): 1827-1832.
19
Knoppova B, Reily C, King RG, et al. Pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy: current understanding and implications for development of disease-specific treatment[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(19) :4501.
20
Courtney AE, McNamee PT, Nelson WE, et al. Does angiotensin blockade influence graft outcome in renal transplant recipients with IgA nephropathy?[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2006, 21(12): 3550-3554.
21
Requião-Moura LR, Mastroianni-Kirsztajn G, Moscoso-Solorzano GT, et al. Impact of therapeutic changes on renal graft survival with posttransplant glomerulonephritis[J]. Transplant Proc, 2007, 39(2): 453-456.
22
Praga M, Caravaca-Fontán F, Da Silva I, et al. Tailored management strategies for IgA nephropathy based on clinical presentations[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2025, 40(5): 874-883.
23
Lafayette R, Kristensen J, Stone A, et al. Efficacy and safety of a targeted-release formulation of budesonide in patients with primary IgA nephropathy (NefIgArd): 2-year results from a randomised phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet, 2023, 402(10405): 859-870.
24
Lv J, Liu L, Hao C, et al. Randomized phase 2 trial of telitacicept in patients with IgA nephropathy with persistent proteinuria[J]. Kidney Int Rep, 2023, 8(3): 499-506.
25
Barratt J, Liew A, Yeo SC, et al. Phase 2 trial of cemdisiran in adult patients with IgA nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2024, 19(4): 452-462.
26
Perkovic V, Barratt J, Rovin B, et al. Alternative complement pathway inhibition with iptacopan in IgA nephropathy[J]. N Engl J Med, 2025, 392(6): 531-543.
27
Haas M, Verhave JC, Liu ZH, et al. A multicenter study of the predictive value of crescents in IgA nephropathy[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2017, 28(2): 691-701.
[1] 刘明, 潘福顺. 儿童移植肾动脉狭窄的多普勒超声评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2026, 23(06): 490-496.
[2] 梁楠, 包瑛, 李志娟, 党佳文, 安小敏. 泰它西普治疗儿童难治性IgA血管炎性肾炎的疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(05): 433-443.
[3] 姚鑫, 苏改秀, 赖建铭, 闫淯淳, 李胜男, 康闽. 全身型幼年特发性关节炎合并肾梗死患儿的临床特征、诊疗及预后[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(04): 323-333.
[4] 李萌, 张炳垚, 张倩, 朱冰洁, 张溪. 肾移植术后合并高血压致药物性牙龈肥大诊疗与4年观察随访1例[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 230-237.
[5] 吕军好, 陈怡彤, 张心怡, 陈江华, 陈大进. 单中心9 000例肾移植受者术后新发恶性肿瘤临床总结[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 230-235.
[6] 陈伟峰, 谢振华, 陈亮亮, 张曙伟, 唐莉. 肾移植术后移植肾静脉血栓形成七例临床诊治分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 189-192.
[7] 杨波, 温爱萍, 马葵芬, 刘相端, 杨辉, 钱卿, 陈攀, 曾芳, 王融溶, 王广钊, 侯文婧. 中国23家肾移植中心抗菌药物管理现状调查[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 91-95.
[8] 王琦, 慕晗梦, 马艳春, 王钢, 李红芹. 双重血浆置换和血浆置换对ABO血型不相容亲属活体肾移植受者术前血型抗体的清除效率及远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 96-103.
[9] 郑慧, 刘杨艳, 骆静, 张莉, 赵庆洪, 戴春笋, 顾民, 曹红娣. 肾移植术后非供者来源结肠毛霉菌病一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 118-122.
[10] 李怡茹, 刘杨艳, 骆静, 刘李林, 曹凯, 吴黄婕, 方奕, 顾民, 曹红娣. 经程序性活检确诊的青少年肾移植受者亚临床排斥反应诊治一例[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 127-131.
[11] 贾莫涵, 双卫兵. 非ACTH依赖型库欣综合征术后三阶段糖皮质激素管理策略[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 336-340.
[12] 王艳, 刘黎, 王祯黎, 肖芹. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病发病机制与吸入制剂临床应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 491-495.
[13] 冯英凯, 苏琛, 彭波, 韩志礼, 王晓明, 陶冠宇, 熊六波, 王恋, 陈兴兵. 中西医结合治疗89例重症肺炎患者的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 282-288.
[14] 王佳怡, 杨敏, 何晓琳, 魏佳琪, 伍刚. 肠-肾轴在IgA肾病发病机制与靶向治疗中的作用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 274-279.
[15] 黄霞, 张和平, 何永成. 机器学习驱动的IgA肾病精准治疗:疗效评估、预后预测及临床转化[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 166-169.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?