切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04) : 260 -267. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2026.04.007

论著

NMF标准在肝移植术后急性肾损伤患者肾脏替代治疗时机选择中的应用价值
叶恭杰1, 郑施2, 翁一如1, 董绉绉1,†()   
  1. 1315040 宁波,宁波大学附属李惠利医院重症医学科
    2315040 宁波,宁波大学附属李惠利医院护理部
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-29 出版日期:2026-08-25
  • 通信作者: 董绉绉
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省医药卫生科技计划(2023KY1043); 浙江省自然科学基金探索公益项目(LTGY24H150001)

The value of NMF standard in selecting the timing of renal replacement therapy for patients with acute kidney injury after liver transplantation

Gongjie Ye1, Shi Zheng2, Yiru Weng1, Zhouzhou Dong1,†()   

  1. 1Department of Intensive Care Unit, the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital to Ningbo University, Ningbo 315040, China
    2Nursing Department, the Affiliated Lihuili Hospital to Ningbo University, Ningbo 315040, China
  • Received:2025-11-29 Published:2026-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Zhouzhou Dong
引用本文:

叶恭杰, 郑施, 翁一如, 董绉绉. NMF标准在肝移植术后急性肾损伤患者肾脏替代治疗时机选择中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 260-267.

Gongjie Ye, Shi Zheng, Yiru Weng, Zhouzhou Dong. The value of NMF standard in selecting the timing of renal replacement therapy for patients with acute kidney injury after liver transplantation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(04): 260-267.

目的

探讨术中去甲肾上腺素用量+术前终末期肝病模型联合血清钠(MELD-Na评分)+术中总入量标准(以下简称"NMF标准")在肝移植术后急性肾损伤(AKI)患者肾脏替代治疗(RRT)时机选择中的临床应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2023年6月宁波大学附属李惠利医院ICU收治的肝移植术后并发AKI患者临床资料,根据前期研究结果制订NMF标准,将173例患者分为4组:(1)A组(n=41),符合NMF标准,且在收治ICU<6 h内行RRT;(2)B组(n=55),符合NMF标准,但未行RRT或收治ICU≥6 h后行RRT;(3)C组(n=18),不符合NMF标准,但在收治ICU<6 h内行RRT;(4)D组(n=59),不符合NMF标准,且未行RRT或收治ICU≥6 h后行RRT。分析比较患者一般资料:年龄、性别、体质指数、病因、序贯器官衰竭评估评分、急性生理和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ评分、移植手术时间、手术方式、是否伴肝昏迷;临床指标:移植术前、术后以及术后第3、7天血清肌酐、MELD-Na评分、血氨;预后指标:累计机械通气时间、累计ICU停留时间、总住院时间,患者28、90 d和1年死亡率,是否并发导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)、慢性肾脏病(CKD)和肝功能异常,是否需长期RRT。正态分布计量资料组间比较采用t检验,非正态分布计量资料组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验,计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

A组和B组患者术后第3、7天血清肌酐和血氨以及术后第7天MELD-Na评分差异均有统计学意义(U/t=2.24、5.30、7.37、7.55和2.73,P均<0.05)。C组和D组患者术后第3天血清肌酐、血氨差异均有统计学意义(U=2.21和5.20,P均<0.05)。A组和B组患者总住院时间以及气管切开、并发CKD和长期RRT比例差异均有统计学意义(t/χ2=3.23、4.59和3.93,P均<0.05)。C组和D组患者并发CRBSI比例差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

按照NMF标准行RRT的肝移植术后AKI患者,其术后血清肌酐、MELD-Na评分和血氨改善更优,总住院时间缩短,并发CKD以及需长期RRT的比例更低;而不符合NMF标准但行RRT的患者,其CRBSI发生率增加。

Objective

To investigate the applicability of NMF criteria in determining the optimal timing for initiating RRT in patients experiencing AKI following liver transplantation.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients with AKI following liver transplantation, who were admitted to ICU at LiHuili Hospital, affiliated of Ningbo University, from January 2018 to June 2023. Based on previous research findings, criteria for NMF were established, and 173 patients were categorized into four distinct groups: (1) Group A (n=41), comprising patients who met the NMF criteria and received renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 6 hours of ICU admission; (2) Group B (n=55), consisting of patients who met the NMF criteria but either did not receive RRT or received RRT after ≥ 6 hours post-ICU admission; (3) Group C (n=18), including patients who did not meet the NMF criteria but received RRT within 6 hours of ICU admission; and (4) Group D (n=59), comprising patients who neither met the NMF criteria nor received RRT, or who received RRT after ≥ 6 hours post-ICU admission. Conduct a comprehensive analysis and comparison of patient demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, gender, BMI, etiology, SOFA score, APACHE Ⅱ score, timing of transplant surgery, surgical technique, and incidence of hepatic coma. Evaluate clinical indicators such as serum creatinine, MELD-Na score, and blood ammonia levels preoperatively, postoperatively, and on the third and seventh days following transplantation. Assess prognostic outcomes by examining cumulative durations of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and total hospitalization, as well as 28-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality rates. Additionally, evaluate the occurrence of CRBSI, CKD, liver dysfunction, and the requirement for long-term RRT. For intergroup comparisons, employ the t-test for normally distributed continuous variables, the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed continuous variables, and the chi-square test or Fisher′s exact test for categorical variables. A P-value of less than 0.05 will be considered indicative of a statistically significant difference.

Results

Statistically significant differences were observed in serum creatinine and blood ammonia levels between patients in Group A and Group B on the third and seventh days following surgery, as well as in MELD-Na scores on postoperative day 7 (U/t= 2.245.30, 7.37, 7.55, 2.73, all P<0.05). Significant differences in serum creatinine and blood ammonia levels were noted between patients in Group C and Group D on the third day post-surgery (U=2.21 and 5.20, both P<0.05). Furthermore, significant differences were identified in the total length of hospital stay and the incidence of tracheostomy, concurrent CKD and long-term RRT between Group A and Group B (t/χ2=3.23, 4.59, 3.93, all P<0.05). Additionally, a statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of CRBSI between Group C and Group D (P<0.05).

Conclusions

According to the NMF criteria, patients with AKI who receive RRT following liver transplantation demonstrate significant improvements in postoperative serum creatinine levels, MELD-Na scores, and blood ammonia levels. Additionally, these patients experience a reduced total hospital stay, a lower incidence of CKD complications, and a decreased necessity for long-term RRT. Conversely, patients who do not meet the NMF criteria yet undergo RRT exhibit a heightened incidence of CRBSI.

图1 研究对象选择流程图注:AKI.急性肾损伤;KDIGO.改善全球肾脏病预后组织;CKD.慢性肾脏病;RRT.肾脏替代治疗
图2 NMF标准决策示意图注:NMF.术中去甲肾上腺素(NE)用量+术前终末期肝病模型联合血清钠(MELD-Na)评分+术中总入量;AKI.急性肾损伤;KDIGO.改善全球肾脏病预后组织;RRT.肾脏替代治疗
表1 NMF标准
表2 肝移植术后并发AKI患者一般资料比较[(±s)或M (P25, P75)]
项目 A组(n=41) B组(n=55) t/χ2/U值 P值 C组(n=18) D组(n=59) t/χ2/U值 P值
年龄(岁) 51.8±9.6 52.9±6.5 0.69 >0.05 53.9±7.5 53.0±11.0 0.34 >0.05
性别(例,男/女) 33/8 49/6 1.40 >0.05 15/3 53/6 - >0.05
BMI(kg/m2) 23.0±3.5 22.7±2.8 0.43 >0.05 22.5±3.2 21.7±2.6 1.01 >0.05
肝衰竭病因[例(%)]                
病毒相关 31(75.6) 41(74.5) 0.01 >0.05 13(72.2) 44(74.6) - >0.05
酒精性 6(14.6) 9(16.4) 0.05 >0.05 3(16.7) 8(13.6) - >0.05
药物或毒物相关 2(4.9) 3(5.5) - >0.05 1(5.6) 4(6.8) - >0.05
其他 2(4.9) 2(3.6) - >0.05 1(5.6) 3(5.1) - >0.05
SOFA评分(分) 5.0(3.0, 6.0) 4.0(2.0, 6.0) 1.69 >0.05 3.6±1.2 4.1±2.0 1.19 >0.05
APACHE Ⅱ评分(分) 11.0±4.6 10.4±5.2 0.61 >0.05 10.3±2.1 10.8±3.9 0.57 >0.05
移植手术时间(min) 518.6±108.3 534.1±107.0 0.70 >0.05 538.9±96.2 531.4±107.9 0.27 >0.05
术式(例,整肝/劈离式) 24/17 38/17 1.14 >0.05 13/5 37/22 - >0.05
术前伴肝昏迷[例(%)] 5(12.2) 7(12.7) 0.01 >0.05 2(11.1) 10(16.9) - >0.05
血清肌酐(μmol/L)                
手术前 70.4(56.7, 86.2) 70.4(54.2, 86.9) 0.01 >0.05 65.8±22.5 70.3±32.0 0.56 >0.05
手术后 189.5±56.1 184.3±61.7 0.42 >0.05 88.3±21.6 81.2±32.2 0.88 >0.05
术后第3天 80.9(72.7, 96.5) 97.9(72.2, 154.1) 2.24 <0.05 63.1(57.9, 78.7) 79.2(59.4, 109.7) 2.21 <0.05
术后第7天 68.6(61.6, 72.2) 119.3(78.5, 161.3) 5.30 <0.05 69.3(55.1, 89.2) 69.1(54.0, 86.4) 0.50 >0.05
血氨(μmol/L)                
手术前 39.0(28.5, 45.0) 36.0(28.0, 44.0) 0.49 >0.05 39.0(26.0, 58.0) 37.0(30.0, 44.0) 0.51 >0.05
手术后 41.9±14.0 38.8±14.2 1.04 >0.05 36.0(22.8, 42.8) 37.0(27.0, 50.0) 0.54 >0.05
术后第3天 20.6±8.4 41.8±16.9 7.37 <0.05 19.5(14.0, 22.8) 43.0(33.0, 55.0) 5.20 <0.05
术后第7天 12.0(9.0, 14.0) 40.0(23.0, 55.0) 7.55 <0.05 22.8±7.3 25.2±8.8 0.16 >0.05
MELD-Na评分(分)                
手术前 7.6(4.6, 18.0) 10.3(5.1, 18.5) 0.60 >0.05 12.5(8.1, 13.6) 10.2(5.1, 16.0) 0.66 >0.05
手术后 12.5(9.3, 16.8) 12.7(9.1, 18.0) 0.09 >0.05 12.7±3.4 12.6±4.2 0.06 >0.05
术后第3天 11.3(7.7, 18.6) 13.9(9.1, 20.9) 1.32 >0.05 12.8±3.3 12.6±5.2 0.02 >0.05
术后第7天 8.9(7.1, 16.6) 14.6(9.2, 21.9) 2.73 <0.05 7.6(6.0, 15.2) 9.9(7.1, 16.6) 1.22 >0.05
表3 肝移植术后并发AKI患者预后指标比较[(±s)或M(P25, P75)]
1
Barreto AG, Daher EF, Silva Junior GB, et al. Risk factors for acute kidney injury and 30-day mortality after liver transplantation[J]. Ann Hepatol, 2015, 14(5):688-694.
2
Klaus F, Keitel da Silva C, Meinerz G, et al. Acute kidney injury after liver transplantation: incidence and mortality[J]. Transplant Proc, 2014, 46(6):1819-1821.
3
中华医学会外科学分会器官移植学组. 肝移植受者肾功能损伤诊疗指南[J/CD]. 实用器官移植电子杂志,2013,1(2):72-74.
4
Cantarovich M, Tchervenkov J, Paraskevas S, et al. Early changes in kidney function predict long-term chronic kidney disease and mortality in patients after liver transplantation[J]. Transplantation, 2011, 92(12):1358-1363.
5
Hilmi IA, Damian D, Al-Khafaji A, et al. Acute kidney injury following orthotopic liver transplantation: incidence, risk factors, and effects on patient and graft outcomes[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2015,114(6):919-926.
6
王建星,刘亚玲,狄长安,等. 持续肾替代治疗在肝移植术后急性肾损伤的应用[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志,2015, 21(1):39-43.
7
董绉绉,石林惠,叶龙强,等. 肝移植术后肾脏替代治疗的危险因素分析及初始治疗时机对预后的影响[J]. 中华危重病急救医学,2018, 30(11):1056-1060.
8
Bagshaw SM, Uchino S, Bellomo R, et al. Timing of renal replacement therapy and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury[J]. J Crit Care, 2009, 24(1):129-140.
9
Vaara ST, Reinikainen M, Wald R, et al. Timing of RRT based on the presence of conventional indications[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2014, 9(9):1577-1585.
10
Chou YH, Huang TM, Wu VC, et al. Impact of timing of renal replacement therapy initiation on outcome of septic acute kidney injury[J]. Critical Care, 2011, 15(3): R134.
11
Crews DC, Scialla JJ, Boulware LE, et al. Comparative effectiveness of early versus conventional timing of dialysis initiation in advanced CKD[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2014, 63(5):806-815.
12
Yang XM, Tu GW, Zheng JL, et al. A comparison of early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. BMC Nephrology, 2017, 18(1):264.
13
张春,刘昌,吕毅,等. 肾脏替代治疗在肝移植术后早期AKI的应用之理解与认识[J]. 中华器官移植杂志,2025, 46(5):351-357.
14
Grolleau F, Porcher R, Barbar S, et al. Personalization of renal replacement therapy initiation: a secondary analysis of the AKIKI and IDEAL-ICU trials[J]. Critical Care, 2022, 26(1):1-10.
15
Rahman S, Mallett S V, Davidson BR. Early acute kidney injury after liver transplantation: Predisposing factors and clinical implications[J]. World J Hepatol, 2017, 9(18):823-832.
16
Utsumi M, Umeda Y, Sadamori H, et al. Risk factors for acute renal injury in living donor liver transplantation: evaluation of the RIFLE criteria[J]. Transplant International, 2013, 26(8): 842-852.
17
Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury[J]. Nephron Clin Pract, 2012, 120(4):c179- c184.
18
Kim WR, Biggins SW, Kremers WK, et al. Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359(10):1018-1026.
19
Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, et al. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts[J]. Hepatology, 2000, 31(4):864-871.
20
Cai L, Shu L, Yujun Z, et al. Lack of furosemide responsiveness predict severe acute kidney injury after liver transplantation[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1):4978.
21
Ren A, Li Z, Zhang X, et al. Optimal timing of initiating CRRT in patients with acute kidney injury after liver transplantation[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2020, 8(21):1361.
22
李晨,游绍莉,刘鸿凌,等. 基线MELD、MELD-Na、iMELD 3种模型对乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者近期预后的评估价值[J]. 中华危重病急救医学,2014,26(8):539-543.
23
胡爱荣,蒋素文,胡耀仁. 肝硬化急性肾损伤及肝肾综合征的诊治路径[J]. 中华危重病急救医学,2016, 28(3):193-199.
24
危国庆,程远,蔡秋程,等. MELD-Na评分对逆行灌注法原位肝移植术后早期急性肾损伤发生的预测作用[J].器官移植,2017, 8(5):360-364.
25
Bittermann T, Hubbard RA, Lewis JD, et al. The proportion of model for end-stage liver disease sodium score attributable to creatinine independently predicts post-transplant survival and renal complications[J]. Clin Transplant, 2020, 34(3):e13817.
26
Romano TG, Schmidtbauer I, Silva FM, et al. Role of MELD score and serum creatinine as prognostic tools for the development of acute kidney injury after liver transplantation[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(5): e64089.
27
da Silveira F, Soares PHR, Marchesan LQ, et al. Assessing the prognosis of cirrhotic patients in the intensive care unit: What we know and what we need to know better[J]. World J Hepatol, 2021, 13(10):1341-1350.
28
Skytte Larsson J, Bragadottir G, Redfors B, et al. Renal function and oxygenation are impaired early after liver transplantation despite hyperdynamic systemic circulation[J]. Crit Care, 2017, 21(1):87.
29
Chen JL, Chen YL, Qi B, et al. Impact of intraoperative norepinephrine support on living donor liver transplantation outcomes: a retrospective cohort study of 430 children[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2020, 11:1254.
30
Xue FS, Dong P, Liu SH. Assessing association of cumulative fluid balance with acute kidney injury after orthotopic liver transplantation[J]. Nephrology (Carlton), 2020, 25(10):801-802.
31
张骊,田大治,滕大洪,等. 肝移植术后肾功能不全病例分享[J/CD]. 实用器官移植电子杂志,2017, 5(4):57-58.
32
Olivari D, Mainardi V, Rando K, et al. Risk factors of mortality after liver transplantation in uruguay[J]. Transplant Proc, 2018, 50(2): 499-502.
33
Iwata H, Mizuno S, Ishikawa E, et al. Negative prognostic impact of renal replacement therapy in adult living-donor liver transplant recipients: preoperative recipient condition and donor factors[J]. Transplant Proc, 2014, 46(3):716-720.
34
Redant S, Beretta-Piccoli X, Mugisha A, et al. Hyperammonemia, the last indication of high-volume hemodiafiltration in adult and children: a structured review[J]. Blood Purif, 2019, 48(4):330-335.
35
Naorungroj T, Yanase F, Eastwood GM, et al. Extracorporeal ammonia clearance for hyperammonemia in critically ill patients: a scoping review[J]. Blood Purif, 2021, 50(4-5):453-461.
36
Bao B, Wang W, Wang Y, et al. A prediction score model and survival analysis of acute kidney injury following orthotopic liver transplantation in adults[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2021, 10(6):6168-6179.
37
Choi HJ, Na GH, Woo YK, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors for patients undergoing renal replacement therapy with acute kidney injury prior to living donor liver transplantation[J]. Transplant Proc, 2022, 54(2):380-385.
38
Abbasi SH, Aftab RA, Mei Lai PS, et al. Prevalence, microbial etiology and risk factors associated with healthcare associated infections among end stage renal disease patients on renal replacement therapy[J]. J Pharm Pract, 2023, 36(5):1142-1155.
39
Kang JS, Jang HR, Lee JE, et al. The bacterial colonization in tunneled cuffed dialysis catheter and its effects on residual renal function in incident hemodialysis patients[J]. Clin Exp Nephrol, 2016, 20(2):294-301.
[1] 林欢, 林志坚, 黄建忠, 陈凯利, 张诗函, 黄巧文. 心脏术后肾损伤患者乳酸轨迹对预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 224-233.
[2] 蒋鲁燕, 沈鸣雁, 张园园, 李皖, 郭冬仙, 万鹏夏. 基于加速康复外科理念下腕踝针疗法在肝移植患者术后胃肠功能障碍中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 241-246.
[3] 刘洵, 毕亮, 郎韧, 吴安石. 同种异体原位肝移植术后早期死亡的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 150-156.
[4] 童翾, 赵洪强, 吴广东, 于里涵, 侯昱丞, 卢倩, 徐光勋, 宋继勇, 林景熠, 郝华媛, 李昂, 汤睿. 胆道系统恶性肿瘤肝移植单中心经验[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 254-259.
[5] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 中国抗癌协会环境肿瘤学专业委员会. 成人肝移植受者新发恶性肿瘤临床诊疗指南(2026版)[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 145-157.
[6] 张长江, 吴若林, 贺智翔, 孔令宝, 黄民辉, 葛恒, 赵红川. 肝移植术后乙型病毒性肝炎复发及其影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 168-173.
[7] 杨静, 王华芬, 卢芳燕, 董丽, 蓝蕾. 术前营养状况对儿童肝移植术后早期临床结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 174-179.
[8] 林罗娇娅, 谢仕龙, 陈滢, 张微, 卢芳燕. 肝移植治疗妊娠期肝衰竭二例并文献分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 193-196.
[9] 汪祖宇, 刘笑安, 王汉譞, 吕少诚, 郎韧. 终末期良性肝病肝移植术后顽固性脾亢影响因素及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 606-611.
[10] 林婉琪, 任芳菲, 钟伟航, 杨卿, 马玲, 陈海丽, 向莎, 陈孟娇, 朱丽萍, 何心念, 张献玲. 基于多维度评估的前瞻性干预策略在肝癌肝移植围手术期的应用及效果[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 612-618.
[11] 丁育, 林倩, 王志, 吴文睿, 张克林, 赵海璇. 肝移植术后早期感染风险简易评分模型构建及分级护理策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 619-626.
[12] 杨健良, 张爱玲, 王晓明, 代天星, 袁峰, 朱灿华, 蓝岚, 杨汉宇, 汪国营. 早期拔除气管插管快通道麻醉在肝移植中应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 398-404.
[13] 叶晓勇, 周林. 耐受性树突状细胞在肝移植免疫耐受中应用进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 420-425.
[14] 傅一飞, 龚娜, 王文娟, 蔡广研. 锯齿状经典缺刻配体2通过肾血管内皮细胞-单核巨噬细胞互作介导急性肾损伤早期炎症的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 129-136.
[15] 姜秀文, 戴璇, 周旻, 张圆, 何媛, 顾乃刚. 慢阻肺病并发肾损伤的机制及早期诊断生物标志物的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 374-380.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?