切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04) : 280 -286. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2026.04.010

所属专题: 文献;

论著

基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的来特莫韦不良事件信号挖掘及药物警戒
林敏玫1, 叶林淼2, 许芝彬3,†()   
  1. 1522000 揭阳,揭阳市人民医院药学部
    2522000 揭阳,揭阳市人民医院药物临床试验机构
    3510120 广州,广州医科大学附属第一医院器官移植科 广州呼吸健康研究院 国家呼吸医学中心 国家呼吸系统疾病临床医学研究中心 呼吸疾病国家重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-11 出版日期:2026-08-25
  • 通信作者: 许芝彬
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科学技术研究基金(面上项目)(A20211282)

Pharmacovigilance analysis of letermovir-associated adverse events based on the U. S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database

Minmei Lin1, Linmiao Ye2, Zhibin Xu3,†()   

  1. 1Department of Pharmacy, Jieyang People′s Hospital, Jieyang 522000, China
    2Clinical Trial Institution, Jieyang People′s Hospital, Jieyang 522000, China
    3Department of Organ Transplantation, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Respiratory Health Research Institute, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2025-10-11 Published:2026-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Zhibin Xu
引用本文:

林敏玫, 叶林淼, 许芝彬. 基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库的来特莫韦不良事件信号挖掘及药物警戒[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 280-286.

Minmei Lin, Linmiao Ye, Zhibin Xu. Pharmacovigilance analysis of letermovir-associated adverse events based on the U. S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(04): 280-286.

目的

基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据,挖掘来特莫韦相关不良事件(ADE)信号并评估发生特征,为临床安全用药提供参考。

方法

检索2017年第4季度至2025年第2季度FAERS数据,采用报告比值比、比例报告比值和贝叶斯置信传播神经网络进行不成比例分析。计算时间到事件(TTO),结合威布尔拟合和经验累积分布函数分析ADE发生时间模式,并按指定医疗事件(DME)分层。

结果

共检出来特莫韦相关报告1 007份,获得65个阳性首选术语信号,涉及15个系统器官分类。纳入有效TTO记录778例,总体中位TTO为43(8,124)d,威布尔拟合形状参数β=0.58(<1),≤30 d和≤90 d累积发生率分别为44.1%和66.8%。关键DME中,肝衰竭中位TTO为5(5,5)d(β=0.88),表现为早期集中发生(≤30 d占96.4%);粒细胞缺乏症[中位TTO为74(40,95)d,β=1.44]与急性肾损伤[中位TTO为88(14,579)d,β=0.68]均呈现明显延迟发生与拖尾现象。

结论

来特莫韦相关ADE整体呈早发倾向,但不同器官时间异质性显著。肝衰竭多见于用药初期,而粒细胞缺乏症与急性肾损伤可延迟发生。临床在用药1~2个月内应加强肝功能与血液学监测,并适当延长肾功能随访周期。

Objective

To detect safety signals and characterize the time-to-onset (TTO) profile of letermovir-associated adverse events (ADE) based on the U. S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods

FAERS data from Q4 2017 to Q2 2025 were retrieved. Disproportionality analyses were performed using reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network. TTO was calculated and fitted using the Weibull distribution, with stratification by designated medical events (DME).

Results

A total of 1 007 letermovir-related reports were identified, yielding 65 positive signals across 15 system organ classes. Among 778 cases with valid TTO, the overall median TTO was 43 (8, 124) days with a Weibull shape parameter β=0.58, indicating an early-onset pattern (cumulative proportion ≤30 days: 44.1%; ≤90 days: 66.8%). For key DMEs, liver failure exhibited typical early onset [median 5 (5, 5) days, β=0.88], whereas agranulocytosis [median 74 (40, 95) days, β=1.44] and acute kidney injury [median 88 (14, 579) days, β=0.68] demonstrated delayed and prolonged risk profiles.

Conclusions

Letermovir-associated ADE predominantly occurs early, but onset patterns vary across organ toxicities. Hepatic monitoring should be prioritized during early therapy, while hematologic and renal surveillance should be extended over a longer window.

表1 基于FAERS数据库统计的来特莫韦相关ADE报告基线特征
表2 基于FAERS数据库统计的来特莫韦相关ADE报告SOC分布
表3 基于FAERS数据库统计的来特莫韦ADE阳性信号例次排序前10位的PT
图1 基于FAERS数据库统计的来特莫韦相关ADE的TTO直方图注:FAERS.美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统;ADE.不良事件;TTO.时间到事件
图2 基于FAERS数据库统计的来特莫韦相关ADE中DME与非DME组的TTO经验累积分布函数曲线注:FAERS.美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统;ADE.不良事件;DME.指定医疗事件;TTO.时间到事件
表4 基于FAERS数据库统计的来特莫韦相关关键DME中首选术语的TTO指标
1
马嘉言,张涛,肖漓. 器官移植中巨细胞病毒潜伏与再激活的免疫机制研究进展[J]. 中华医学杂志,2025, 105(32): 2786-2791.
2
巨春蓉,门同义,薛武军. 实体器官移植后难治性/耐药性巨细胞病毒感染诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志:电子版,2024, 18(2): 86-92.
3
中华医学会血液学分会感染学组,中华医学会器官移植学分会,中国临床肿瘤学会白血病专家委员会,等. 免疫缺陷人群难治性/耐药性巨细胞病毒感染诊治策略中国专家共识(2025年版)[J]. 中华血液学杂志,2025, 46(5): 402-409.
4
MERCK. Merck receives FDA approval of PREVYMIS™ (letermovir) for prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in adult allogeneic stem cell transplant patients[EB/OL]. (2017-11-09) [2025-10-09].

URL    
5
Marty FM, Ljungman P, Chemaly RF, et al. Letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic-cell transplantation[J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 377(25): 2433-2444.
6
Data FDA Access. PREVYMIS-highlights of prescribing information[EB/OL]. (2023-06) [2025-10-09].

URL    
7
Coste A, Wong A, Bokern M, et al. Methods for drug safety signal detection using routinely collected observational electronic health care data: a systematic review[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2023, 32(1): 28-43.
8
Evans SJ, Waller PC, Davis S. Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2001, 10(6): 483-486.
9
Bate A, Lindquist M, Edwards IR, et al. A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation[J]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 1998, 54(4): 315-321.
10
巨春蓉,郝建清,何建行,等. 移植受者耐药巨细胞病毒感染的诊治[J]. 中华器官移植杂志,2023, 44(3): 146-151.
11
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves first treatment for common type of post-transplant infection that is resistant to other drugs: approval is for cytomegalovirus, a type of herpes virus[EB/OL]. (2021-11-23) [2025-10-10].

URL    
12
Data FDA Access. LIVTENCITY (maribavir) label-highlights of prescribing information[EB/OL]. (2021-11) [2025-10-09].

URL    
13
Pérez AB, Santos Bravo M, Vidal-Verdú E, et al. Real-life experience in two cases of secondary prophylaxis with letermovir for CMV infection in solid organ transplantation[J]. Microbiol Spectr, 2023, 11(6): e0163023.
14
周迷,朱玉莲,杨勇. 新型抗病毒药物防治移植患者巨细胞病毒感染的研究进展[J]. 医药导报,2022, 41(4): 458-461.
15
Descourouez JL, Kleiboeker H, Saddler CM, et al. The UW experience: feasibility of de novo letermovir for primary prophylaxis after abdominal solid organ transplant[J]. Ann Pharmacother, 2025, 59(8): 730-735.
16
Fukuda M, Hattori J, Ohkubo R, et al. Real-world safety and effectiveness of letermovir in patients undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: final results of post-marketing surveillance in Japan[J]. Clin Drug Investig, 2024, 44(7):527-540.
17
Limaye AP, Budde K, Humar A, et al. Letermovir vs valganciclovir for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus in high-risk kidney transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Jama, 2023, 330(1): 33-42.
18
Burger DM, Nijboer L, Ghobreyal M, et al. Drug-drug interaction management with the novel anti-cytomegalovirus agents letermovir and maribavir: guidance for clinicians[J]. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2024, 63(11): 1529-1546.
19
Younis I, Weber E, Nelson C, et al. Evaluation of the potential for cytochrome P450 and transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions for cilofexor, a selective nonsteroidal farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist[J]. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2023, 62(4): 609-621.
20
Kropeit D, Scheuenpflug J, Erb-Zohar K, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of letermovir, a novel anti-human cytomegalovirus drug, in patients with renal impairment[J]. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2017, 83(9): 1944-1953.
21
McCrea JB, Macha S, Adedoyin A, et al. Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between letermovir and the immunosuppressants cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil[J]. J Clin Pharmacol, 2019, 59(10): 1331-1339.
22
Hedvat J, Choe JY, Salerno DM, et al. Managing the significant drug-drug interaction between tacrolimus and letermovir in solid organ transplant recipients[J]. Clin Transplant, 2021, 35(3): e14213.
23
Descourouez JL, Mandelbrot DA, Odorico J, et al. LCP-tacrolimus requires a similar empiric dose adjustment to immediate-release tacrolimus when given concomitantly with letermovir for cytomegalovirus primary prophylaxis[J]. Ann Pharmacother, 2024, 58(8): 870-871.
24
Hirama T, Shundo Y, Watanabe T, et al. Correction to: letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus in lung-transplant recipients: a comprehensive study with literature review of off-label use and real-world experiences[J]. Clin Exp Med, 2024, 24(1): 116.
25
Goodlet KJ, Garcia R. Effect of letermovir initiation on tacrolimus concentrations among lung transplant recipients receiving concomitant azole antifungal prophylaxis[J]. Transpl Infect Dis, 2024, 26(2): e14267.
[1] 刘真真, 张莉, 陈程, 彭思婷, 赵瑞娜, 董一凡, 吕珂, 朱庆莉, 李建初, 杨筱. 将医疗安全不良事件案例分析融入超声医学课程思政教学的初步探索[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(09): 876-880.
[2] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[3] 周文考, 袁丽, 任晓媛, 谢强, 苏力德, 闫敏, 陈智浩, 黄灵炎. 基于随机森林与LASSO回归的急性心肌梗死PCI术后3年不良事件预测模型构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 122-130.
[4] 黄晶, 邓慧, 李乐生. 鹦鹉热衣原体致重症社区获得性肺炎伴胰腺损伤一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 209-214.
[5] 彭文翰. 肾移植受者早期霉酚酸强化剂量长期有效性和安全性的研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 0-0.
[6] 蒋延龄, 任瑾卓, 陈俊杰, 田秀丽, 莘翼翔, 张华. 血浆细胞因子谱预测非小细胞肺癌患者临床获益和免疫相关不良事件的意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 558-563.
[7] 李姣, 张莉, 侯云秋, 孙腾, 梁艳, 霍博. 预警机制在AECOPD 并发呼吸衰竭全方位无盲点管理中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(06): 948-952.
[8] 谢伟, 张小峰, 沈锋. 肿瘤免疫治疗相关不良事件的流行病学特征、发生机制和防治策略[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 146-151.
[9] 张龙, 徐伟, 孙善柯, 李文柱, 李俊达, 池涌泉, 宋进华, 王学浩, 成峰, 饶建华. 载药微球经动脉栓塞化疗在巨块型肝癌转化治疗中的疗效及安全性[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 28-35.
[10] 曾士桃, 严庆, 廖珊, 陈焕伟. 肝动脉灌注化疗联合仑伐替尼及PD-1抑制剂与肝动脉灌注化疗联合仑伐替尼治疗不可切除肝癌的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 225-231.
[11] 蒋坤寅, 韩少宇, 郝成俊, 杨峰, 张振清. 老年髋部骨折术后心脏不良事件的影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 96-102.
[12] 黄福秀, 张宁宁, 李晨阳, 李淑玲, 陈超. 单纯电切、单纯电凝与电凝电切术对扁平肠息肉疗效及不良事件发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 310-314.
[13] 李子木, 蒋祥德, 王强强, 施朕善. 营养评估在预测老年食管癌患者放疗及同步放化疗急性不良事件中的作用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 33-40.
[14] 南文慧, 周丽花, 李珊珊, 荣嵘. 冠状动脉旁路移植术后行hs-TnI预测主要心血管不良事件发生的临界值及相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 237-242.
[15] 杨婷, 邱晓珏, 陈青雅, 张宝晶, 王伟伟. 经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎预测模型的建立与评价[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 200-204.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?