Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04): 211-215. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2017.04.004

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The effect of different nutritional modes during perioperative period on infection early after liver transplantation

Liming Ding1, Xinchang Li1, Wenfeng Luo1, Xiaomei Huang1, Zhidan Xu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Organ Transplantation, Jiangxi Province People′s Hospital, Nanchang 330006, China
  • Received:2017-09-08 Online:2017-11-25 Published:2017-11-25
  • Contact: Zhidan Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Zhidan, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To study the effect of different nutritional modes during perioperative period on infection early after liver transplantation and try to explore a reasonable type of nutritional mode.

Methods

Clinical data of 104 cases getting liver transplantation in the department of organ transplantation, Jiangxi Province People′s Hospital during January 2001 and July 2017, was retrospectively analyzed. All the recipients were divided into total parenteral nutrition (TPN) group (n=51) and non TPN group (n=53) according to the nutritional mode. Recipients in TPN group received TPN via deep vein infusion conduit for 7 days since the first day after surgery, and gradually transiting to euphagia according to recovery condition during 8 to 14 days after operation. Recipients in non TPN group received enteral nutrition (EN) during the first day after surgery, and gradually transiting to part EN plus parenteral nutrition (PN) and totally enteral nutrition(TEN) since the second day after operation. The infection rate and distribution of bacterial and fungal of respiratory tract, enterocoelia, biliary tract, urinary tract, deep vein infusion conduit and digestive tract during 2 weeks after operation were tested. T test was used to compared the age and weight of recipients before operation, Chi-squared test was used to compare the baseline information and the infection rate and distribution of bacterial and fungal during 2 weeks after operation. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There was no statistical significance for the baseline information between the 2 groups (P all >0.05). The infection rate of bacterial and fungal between the 2 groups during 2 weeks after operation were 47% (24/51) and 34% (18/53), 25% (13/51) and 11% (6/53), which had statistical significance (χ2=0.032, 0.041, P all <0.05). The infection rate of bacterial of deep vein infusion conduit between the 2 groups during 2 weeks after operation were 20% (10/51) and 2% (1/53), which had statistical significance (χ2 =0.76, P<0.05); the infection rate of fungal of digestive tract between the 2 groups during 2 weeks after operation were 22% (11/51) and 0, which had statistical significance (χ2 =0.79, P<0.05).

Conclusion

Application of EN and PN, and gradually transiting to TEN can reduce the infection rate compared with TPN.

Key words: Liver transplantation, Nutritional support, Total parenteral nutrition, Parenteral nutrition, Enteral nutrition, Infection

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0571-87236589 E-mail: yizhi@zju.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd