Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03): 177-183. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2017.03.011

Special Issue:

• Meta-Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical effect of salvage liver transplantation in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: a systematic review

Hongliang Wang1, Jianhui Dong1, Liugen Lan1, Ke Qin1, Meisi Li1, Haibin Li1, Zhuangjiang Li1, Xuyong Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Institute of Transplant Medicine, 303 Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Guangxi Key Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangxi Transplantation Medicine Research Center of Engineering Technology, Nanning 530021, China
  • Received:2016-12-12 Online:2017-08-25 Published:2017-08-25
  • Contact: Xuyong Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Xuyong, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of salvage liver transplantation (SLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods

Information up to August 31th 2016 was retrieved from Cochrane library, Pubmed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, CSPD and VIP without linguistic constraints. Collected publications were all about case-control study of SLT or primary liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. All the included articles were performed with data extraction and quality assessment and then analyzed with RevMan 5.3.

Results

A total of 17 articles including 9 335 patients were enrolled. There was no statistic difference between SLT and PLT on 1-year survival rate, 1-year disease-free survival rate (RR=0.93, 95%CI: 0.80-1.08, P=0.36; RR=0.94, 95%CI: 0.81-1.08, P=0.40). However, 3-year survival rate and 5-year disease-free survival rate of PLT were higher than SLT(RR=0.88, 95%CI: 0.77-1.00, P=0.04; RR=0.86, 95%CI: 0.76-0.98, P=0.02; RR=0.83, 95%CI: 0.73-0.94, P=0.005; RR=0.77, 95%CI: 0.67-0.88, P=0.001).

Conclusion

Long-term efficacy of PLT was better than SLT.

Key words: Primary hepatic carcinoma, Salvage liver transplantation, Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma, Systematic review

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0571-87236589 E-mail: yizhi@zju.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd