切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 116 -120. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2018.03.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

加速康复外科在肾移植围手术期管理中的应用
雷文华1, 彭文翰1, 吕军好1, 陈江华1, 吴建永1,()   
  1. 1. 310003 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院肾脏病中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-10 出版日期:2018-08-25
  • 通信作者: 吴建永

The application of enhanced recovery after surgery in kidney transplantation recipients during perioperative managemant

Wenhua Lei1, Wenhan Peng1, Junhao Lyu1, Jianghua Chen1, Jianyong Wu1,()   

  1. 1. Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
  • Received:2018-08-10 Published:2018-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Jianyong Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Jianyong, Email:
引用本文:

雷文华, 彭文翰, 吕军好, 陈江华, 吴建永. 加速康复外科在肾移植围手术期管理中的应用[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 116-120.

Wenhua Lei, Wenhan Peng, Junhao Lyu, Jianghua Chen, Jianyong Wu. The application of enhanced recovery after surgery in kidney transplantation recipients during perioperative managemant[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(03): 116-120.

目的

探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)应用于肾移植围手术期管理的有效性和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析浙江大学医学院附属第一医院肾脏病中心2016年7月至2017年8月474例同种异体肾移植受者临床资料,2016年7月至2017年4月实施传统围手术期管理的315例受者为传统组,2017年5月至2017年8月实施ERAS方案的159例受者为ERAS组。EARS组受者围手术期管理主要内容包括取消肠道准备、术前饮用碳水化合物、早期进食、早期活动及多模式镇痛等。观察并比较两组受者术后平均住院时间、血清肌酐水平,以及胃肠道反应、移植肾功能延迟恢复(DGF)、术后90 d内急性排斥反应、移植后新发糖尿病发生率和术后90 d内非计划再入院率。两组受者年龄、体质量、术前透析时间等计量资料比较采用成组t检验,两组受者DGF、术后90 d急性排斥反应发生率等计数资料比较采用χ2检验。

结果

ERAS组和传统组受者性别、年龄、身高、体质量、术前透析时间、供肾类型、HLA错配数差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。ERAS组活体和尸体肾移植受者术后住院时间分别为(7.7±2.0) d和(12.8±8.3)d,均短于传统组[(9.0±3.8)d和(16.7±12.6) d],差异具有统计学意义(t=-2.594和-2.692,P均<0.05)。两组术后7、30和90 d血清肌酐水平差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。ERAS组腹泻发生率为5.7%(9/159),明显低于传统组(20.7%,65/315),差异有统计学意义(χ2=18.092,P<0.05)。两组尸体肾移植受者DGF、术后90 d内急性排斥反应、移植后新发糖尿病、其他并发症发生率以及术后90 d内非计划再入院率差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。

结论

将ERAS应用于肾移植围手术期管理是有效、安全的,能够降低受者术后平均住院时间和腹泻发生率,同时未增加其他并发症的发生。

Objective

To explore the validity and security of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in kidney transplantation recipients during perioperative managemant.

Methods

The clinical data of 474 kidney transplantation recipients who received kidney transplantation in Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University during July 2016 to August 2017 were retrospectively analysed, among which 315 recipients who got traditional perioperative managemant during July 2016 to April 2017 were divided into traditional group, and 159 recipients who got ERAS during perioperative managemant were diveded into ERAS group. The main content of ERAS included bowel preparation removal, preoperative carbohydrate loading, early-stage feeding, early mobilization, multimodal approach to opioid-sparing pain control and so on. Indexes like mean post operation hospitalization duration, serum creatinine, gastrointestinal reaction, delayed graft dysfunction (DGF), acute reaction during 90 days after surgery, incidence rate of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation and unscheduled readmission rate during 90 days after surgery were compared between the 2 groups. Measurement data like age, weight and time of dialysis preoperative between the 2 groups were compared by Student′s t-test, and enumeration data like incidence rate of DGF and acute reaction during 90 days after surgery between the 2 groups were compared by chi-square test.

Results

No statistical difference was found in gender, age, height, weight, time of dialysis preoperative, type of donor kidney and HLA mismatch number between the 2 groups (P all >0.05). The post operation hospitalization duration of living donor renal transplantation recipients and cadaveric donor renal transplantation recipients in ERAS group were (7.7±2.0) d and (12.8±8.3) d, respectively, which were shorter than traditional group [(9.0±3.8) d and (16.7±12.6) d], and the difference was statistically significant (t=-2.594 and -2.692, P all <0.05). No statistical difference was found in serum creatinine of 7, 30 and 90 days after transplantation between the 2 groups (P all >0.05). The incidence rate of diarrhea of ERAS group and traditional group were 5.7% (9/159) and 20.7% (65/315), respectively, which had statistical difference (χ2=18.092, P<0.05). No statistical difference was found in DGF, acute reaction during 90 days after transplantation, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation, incidence rate of other complications and unscheduled readmission rate during 90 days after surgery between the 2 groups (P all >0.05).

Conclusions

ERAS protocol can decreased post operation hospitalization duration and incidence rate of diarrhea without influence on other complications, which was safe and effective.

表1 ERAS组和传统组肾移植受者术前一般资料比较
表2 ERAS组和传统组肾移植受者术后并发症发生情况
1
Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1997,78(5):606-617.
2
Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery[J]. Lancet, 2003,362(9399):1921-1928.
3
Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, et al. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Clin Nutr, 2010,29(4):434-440.
4
Tyson MD, Chang SS. Enhanced recovery pathways versus standard care after cystectomy: a meta-analysis of the effect on perioperative outcomes[J]. Eur Urol, 2016,70(6):995-1003.
5
Nelson G, Kiyang LN, Crumley ET, et al. Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) across a provincial healthcare system: the ERAS Alberta colorectal surgery experience[J]. World J Surg, 2016,40(5):1092-1103.
6
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations[J]. World J Surg, 2013,37(2):259-284.
7
Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations[J]. World J Surg, 2013,37(2):240-258.
8
Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, et al. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations[J]. Br J Surg, 2014,101(10):1209-1229.
9
Waits SA, Hilliard P, Sheetz KH, et al. Building the case for enhanced recovery protocols in living kidney donors[J]. Transplantation, 2015,99(2):405-408.
10
Kruszyna T, Niekowal B, Kras 'nicka M, et al. Enhanced recovery after kidney transplantation surgery[J]. Transplant Proc, 2016,48(5):1461-1465.
11
Zhong JX, Kang K, Shu XL. Effect of nutritional support on clinical outcomes in perioperative malnourished patients: a meta-analysis[J]. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr, 2015,24(3):367-378.
12
中国加速康复外科专家组. 中国加速康复外科围术期管理专家共识(2016版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2016,15(6):527-533.
13
Ljungqvist O, Nygren J, Thorell A. Modulation of post-operative insulin resistance by pre-operative carbohydrate loading[J]. Proc Nutr Soc, 2002,61(3):329-336.
14
Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review[J]. JAMA Surg, 2017,152(3):292-298.
[1] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 遗体捐献肾脏获取手术技术操作指南[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-265.
[2] 邹永康, 石雍, 徐贤刚, 张帅民, 刘衍, 杨生鹏, 叶啟发, 陈根, 张毅. 肾移植术后手术切口米根霉感染伴菌血症一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 289-292.
[3] 吕玥彤, 靳梦圆, 周大为, 叶啟发. 机器人辅助下肾移植的临床进展与争议[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 242-246.
[4] 尚丽红, 王志华, 张文艳, 朱琳茹, 周华. 内皮粘蛋白抗体与肾移植术后抗体介导排斥反应和移植肾预后的研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 165-170.
[5] 吕军好, 林锦雯, 张心怡, 陈江华. 细胞外囊泡在肾移植诊断和治疗中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 186-192.
[6] 陆婷, 陈浩, 王雪静, 谭若芸, 彭宇竹. 肾移植术后一年发生代谢综合征的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 98-103.
[7] 郭明星, 徐烨, 徐菀佚, 赵莹, 刘冉佳, 潘晨, 崔向丽. 2017—2022年中国105家医院肾移植术后门诊受者免疫抑制剂用药分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 104-109.
[8] 许桂祥, 吴海华, 赵鸿志, 徐丽, 胡晓萍, 周世龙, 武永明, 彭新刚. 后鞘前入路腹腔镜视野下腹股沟区脂肪归属的解剖要点及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 277-281.
[9] 成紫琳, 戴明, 李建华, 马靓. 加速康复外科理念在儿童腹股沟疝围手术期的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 331-335.
[10] 王招荐, 曹桢, 郭小双, 靳小雷, 刘子文. 加速康复外科理念应用于腹壁重建手术的系统评价及Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 343-350.
[11] 冯嘉楠, 蔡磊, 何国林, 付顺军, 张成, 冯周彬, 温耀鸿, 谭洪坤, 潘明新. 腹腔镜胆总管切开探查取石一期缝合的安全性与疗效:附128例分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 543-550.
[12] 朱志, 张鑫炜, 谭文斐, 高梓茗, 赵睿涵, 杨野, 王世洋, 智冬梅, 赵鑫, 尹长欣, 高畅远, 王锡山, 王振宁, 李凯, 周海涛. 直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术在日间手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 329-334.
[13] 李凯, 朱志, 周海涛, 王俊, 杨野, 赵鑫, 谷金蓉, 智冬梅, 王世洋, 高梓茗, 张鑫炜, 赵睿涵, 王锡山, 王振宁. 经自然腔道取标本手术(NOSES)在结直肠癌日间手术中的应用探索[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 63-67.
[14] 张秋玥, 程羽, 牛雨田, 唐茂芝, 张克勤, 张懿, 郭亚楠, 涂增. 肾移植与人体微生态的相关性研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 207-213.
[15] 马建惠, 韩琦, 李韶玲. 加速康复外科护理路径+量化评估对腹腔镜胆囊切除术高龄患者手术室护理满意度的影响[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2024, 11(01): 53-56.
阅读次数
全文


摘要