切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 216 -219. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2020.04.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

扫描式葡萄糖监测系统在肝移植术后早期受者中的应用研究
廖昌贵1, 胡娴1, 张利姗1, 何小凤1, 叶海丹1,()   
  1. 1. 510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院器官移植中心
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-15 出版日期:2020-08-25
  • 通信作者: 叶海丹

Application of flash glucose monitoring system in liver transplant recipients during the early stage after transplantation

Changgui Liao1, Xian Hu1, Lishan Zhang1, Xiaofeng He1, Haidan Ye1,()   

  1. 1. Organ Transplant Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2019-11-15 Published:2020-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Haidan Ye
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ye Haidan, Email:
引用本文:

廖昌贵, 胡娴, 张利姗, 何小凤, 叶海丹. 扫描式葡萄糖监测系统在肝移植术后早期受者中的应用研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 216-219.

Changgui Liao, Xian Hu, Lishan Zhang, Xiaofeng He, Haidan Ye. Application of flash glucose monitoring system in liver transplant recipients during the early stage after transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 216-219.

目的

探讨扫描式葡萄糖监测(FGM)系统在肝移植术后早期受者中的应用。

方法

选取2019年4月至8月在中山大学附属第一医院器官移植中心行同种异体肝移植术的28例受者,应用FGM系统(美国雅培公司)连续监测组织间液葡萄糖浓度。同时采集受者清晨空腹血液标本,使用全自动生化分析仪检测静脉血糖值作为参考,评估FGM血糖值临床应用的精准性。使用R语言3.6.1软件进行克拉克误差网格分析。采用配对t检验或秩和检验比较术后第1周与第2周FGM结果,采用Pearson相关分析比较FGM血糖值与静脉血糖值的相关性。计算FGM血糖值与静脉血糖值配对数据的平均相对误差绝对值(MARD)和决定系数r2,比较两种血糖检测方法的一致性。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

28例受者平均佩戴FGM系统时间为(12.5±2.4)d(7~14 d),佩戴期间均未出现过敏、瘙痒、皮肤红斑、青紫和疼痛等不良反应,均未出现传感器脱落。FGM系统佩戴期间,28例受者预估糖化血红蛋白为(6.7±1.7)%,FGM血糖值为(8±3)mmol/L,目标范围内时间为(72±34)%,低于和高于目标范围时间中位数分别为1%和8%。3例受者FGM血糖值全程在目标范围内,23例出现过高于目标范围,14例出现过低于目标范围。肝移植术后第2周FGM血糖值低于术后第1周,分别为(8±3)、(9±4)mmol/L,差异有统计学意义(t=2.4,P<0.05);术后第2周低于目标范围时间中位数(1%)高于术后第1周(0%),差异有统计学意义(z=-2.5,P<0.05)。FGM系统佩戴期间共采集244对空腹FGM血糖值与静脉血糖值,平均血糖值分别为(7±4)、(8±4)mmol/L,二者呈高度正相关(r=0.976,P<0.05)。以全自动生化分析仪检测的静脉血糖值作为参考,克拉克误差网格分析结果示:FGM血糖值有93%(227/244)落在A区,有7%(17/244)落在B区。MARD=9.8%,r2=0.95。

结论

FGM系统在肝移植术后早期受者中的临床应用是可行的,与常规间断末梢血糖监测方法相比,可监测到更多血糖异常事件及其持续时间,并及时采取有效治疗措施,控制血糖水平在最佳范围。

Objective

To investigate the application of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system in liver transplant recipients during the early stage after transplantation.

Methods

Twenty-eight recipients who got allotransplantation of the liver in the Organ Transplant Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from April to August 2019 were included in the study. FGM system (Abbott Laboratories, USA) was used to continuously monitor the interstitial fluid glucose concentration, and fasting blood samples of the recipients were collected in the morning, the venous blood glucose value was measured by automatic biochemical analyzer as a reference to evaluate the accuracy of clinical application of FGM blood glucose value. The R language 3.6.1 software was used for Clarke error grid analysis. Paired t-test or rank sum test was used for FGM results at 1 and 2 weeks after liver transplantation. Pearson correlation analysis was used to compare the correlation between FGM blood glucose values and venous blood glucose values. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) and determination coefficient r2 of the paired data of FGM blood glucose and intravenous blood glucose were calculated to compare the consistency of the two methods. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The average wearing time of FGM system in 28 recipients was (12.5±2.4) d (7-14 d), and no adverse reactions such as allergy, itching, skin erythea, cyanosis and pain occurred during wearing, and no sensor shedding occurred. During the wearing of the FGM system, the estimated glycated hemoglobin of 28 recipients was (6.7±1.7) %, the glucose level of FGM was (8±3) mmol/L, and the time within the target range was (72±34) %, with the median time below and above the target range being 1% and 8%, respectively. The FGM blood glucose values of 3 recipients was within the target range throughout the whole process, 23 cases were once above the target range, and 14 cases were once below the target range. The blood glucose level of FGM at 2 weeks after transplantation [(8±3) mmol/L] was lower than that at 1 week [(9±4) mmol/L], and the difference was statistically significant (t=2.4, P<0.05). The median time below the target range at 2 weeks after transplantation (1%) was higher than that at 1 week (0%), and the difference was statistically significant (z=-2.5, P<0.05). During wearing the FGM system, 244 pairs of fasting FGM blood glucose values and venous blood glucose values were collected, the average blood glucose level was (7±4) and (8±4) mmol/L respectively, showing a highly positive correlation (r=0.976, P<0.05). The results of Clarke error grid analysis showed that 93% (227/244) and 7% (17/244) of FGM blood glucose values were in zone A and B respectively. MARD=9.8%, r2=0.95.

Conclusions

The clinical application of FGM system in liver transplant recipients during the early stage after transplantation was feasible. Compared with the conventional intermittent peripheral blood glucose monitoring, more abnormal blood glucose events and their duration could be detected. It could help to take favorable treatment to control glucose levels in the best range.

表1 肝移植术后FGM结果比较
图1 FGM血糖值与静脉血糖值的克拉克误差网格分析结果
1
Marchetti P. New-onset diabetes after liver transplantation: from pathogenesis to management[J]. Liver transpl, 2005, 6(6): 612-620.
2
Listed N. Epidemiology of severe hypoglycemia in the diabetes control and complications trial. The DCCT Research Group[J]. Am J Med, 1991, 90(4): 450-459.
3
Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 353(25): 2643-2653.
4
Feldman B, Brazg R, Schwartz S, et al. A continuous glucose sensor based on wired enzyme technology: results from a 3-day trial in patients with type 1 diabetes[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2003, 5(5): 769-779.
5
Hoss U, Budiman ES, Liu H, et al. Feasibility of factory calibration for subcutaneous glucose sensors in subjects with diabetes[J]. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2014, 8(1): 89-94.
6
刘蔚,纪立农. 从循证证据看扫描式葡萄糖监测技术的应用[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2018, 10(10): 637-639.
7
Bailey T, Bode BW, Christiansen MP, et al. The performance and usability of a factory-calibrated flash glucose monitoring system[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2015, 17(11): 787-794.
8
Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, et al. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose[J]. Diabetes Care, 1987, 23(11): 622-628.
9
Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, et al. Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2016, 338(10057): 2254-2263.
10
何晓顺,陈知水,鞠卫强,等. 改良上腹部多器官移植治疗终末期肝病合并糖尿病的长期疗效分析[J]. 中华器官移植杂志,2014, 35(11): 644-649.
11
刘振文,苏海滨,张敏,等. 肝移植术后相关高血糖症的调查分析[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志,2011, 19(5): 378-379.
12
Bloom RD, Crutchlow MF. Transplant-associated hyperglycemia[J]. Transplant Rev (Orlando), 2008, 22(1): 39-51.
13
Danne T, Nimri R, Battelino T, et al. International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring[J]. Diabetes Care, 2017, 40(12): 1631-1640.
14
司一鸣,应令雯,周健. 持续葡萄糖监测临床应用国际专家共识解读[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志,2018, 10(6): 386-389.
15
吴孟超. 肝脏外科学[M]. 上海:上海科学技术文献出版社,2000:648-649.
16
方德宁,于燕,高歌. 肝硬化患者的胰岛素抵抗及生长抑素对肝硬化血糖及胰岛素影响的探讨[J]. 中国实验诊断学,2003, 7(5): 412-414.
17
武若君,石炳毅,李彬,等. 肝移植术后早期血糖与电解质的调控[J]. 中国医师杂志,2006, 8(6): 756-758.
18
蔡玲莉,周健,贾伟平. 瞬感扫描式葡萄糖监测系统的临床研究进展[J]. 中华内科杂志,2018, 57(11): 858-861.
[1] . 肝移植治疗终末期肝病[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 1-.
[2] 李坤河, 寇萌佳, 邝立挺. 肝移植术后二次气管插管的危险因素及预测模型的建立[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 366-371.
[3] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 上海医药行业协会. 中国肝、肾移植受者霉酚酸类药物应用专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 257-272.
[4] 陆闻青, 陈昕怡, 任雪飞. 遗传代谢病儿童肝移植受者术后生活质量调查研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 287-292.
[5] 范铁艳, 李君, 陈虹. 肝移植术后新发戊型病毒性肝炎的诊治经验[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 293-296.
[6] 陈朔, 陈峰, 程飞, 项捷. 糖原累积病Ⅰ型并发胰腺炎肝移植术后胰腺梗死一例[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 300-302.
[7] 汤鹏昊, 张武. 肠道微生态与肝移植围手术期并发症相关研究进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 303-307.
[8] 中国器官移植发展基金会器官移植受者健康管理专家委员会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 国家肝脏移植质控中心. 肝移植受者雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂临床应用中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 193-204.
[9] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[10] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[11] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[12] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[13] 王孟龙. 肿瘤生物学特征在肝癌肝移植治疗中的意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 490-494.
[14] 王晓东, 汪恺, 葛昭, 丁忠祥, 徐骁. 计算机视觉技术在肝癌肝移植疗效提升中的研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 361-366.
[15] 黄岩, 刘晓巍, 杨春玲, 兰烨. 急性胰腺炎合并糖尿病患者的临床特征及血糖代谢与病情严重度的相关性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 439-442.
阅读次数
全文


摘要