切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 220 -224. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2020.04.005

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

剪切波弹性成像在供肝评估中的临床应用
杨皖东1, 肖春华1,(), 普慧敏1, 李永峰1, 李鸿1, 杨薇1, 沈燕1, 丁世兰1   
  1. 1. 650224 昆明医科大学附属甘美医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-22 出版日期:2020-08-25
  • 通信作者: 肖春华

Clinical application of shear wave elastography in evaluation of donor liver

Wandong Yang1, Chunhua Xiao1,(), Huimin Pu1, Yongfeng Li1, Hong Li1, Wei Yang1, Yan Shen1, Shilan Ding1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Calmette Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650224, China
  • Received:2019-11-22 Published:2020-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Chunhua Xiao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xiao Chunhua, Email:
引用本文:

杨皖东, 肖春华, 普慧敏, 李永峰, 李鸿, 杨薇, 沈燕, 丁世兰. 剪切波弹性成像在供肝评估中的临床应用[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 220-224.

Wandong Yang, Chunhua Xiao, Huimin Pu, Yongfeng Li, Hong Li, Wei Yang, Yan Shen, Shilan Ding. Clinical application of shear wave elastography in evaluation of donor liver[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 220-224.

目的

探讨剪切波弹性成像(SWE)结合常规超声对供肝质量评估的临床应用价值。

方法

2014年2月至2017年10月昆明医科大学附属甘美医院实施公民逝世后器官捐献肝移植共121例,供肝获取前所有供者均行常规超声及SWE检查。根据术中快速病理检查结果将供者分为正常组和异常组,异常组包括脂肪肝、肝淤血、肝纤维化和肝坏死。采用成组t检验分别比较异常组、脂肪肝组、肝纤维化组与正常组供肝杨氏模量值。绘制受试者工作特征曲线,以约登指数最高时的杨氏模量值作为区分正常和异常供肝的截断值,计算相应敏感度和特异度。

结果

根据术中快速病理检查结果,121例供者分为正常组73例,异常组48例;异常组包括脂肪肝组21例、肝淤血组18例、肝纤维化组5例和肝坏死组4例。异常组和正常组供肝杨氏模量值分别为(5.55±1.56)kPa和(3.64±0.70)kPa,差异有统计学意义(t=7.964,P<0.05)。截断值=4.07 kPa时,约登指数最高=0.628,SWE诊断供肝病变的敏感度为83.3%,特异度为79.5%。脂肪肝组和肝纤维化组供肝杨氏模量值分别为(5.56±1.43)和(6.67±1.36)kPa,均高于正常组,差异均有统计学意义(t=5.974和4.933,P均<0.05)。肝淤血组和肝坏死组杨氏模量值分别为2.46~7.11 kPa和5.62~9.11 kPa。

结论

SWE可以定量评估肝组织硬度,对异常和正常肝脏的鉴别具有较高特异度。SWE结合常规超声检查可以对供肝质量进行无创、定量评估,具有较高的临床应用价值。

Objective

To investigate the clinical value of shear wave elastography (SWE) combined with conventional ultrasound in the evaluation of donor liver quality.

Methods

From February 2014 to October 2017, 121 cases of donation after citizens′ death for liver transplantation were performed in Calmette Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, and all the donors were performed with ultrasound and SWE before the graft harvest. The donors were divided into normal group and abnormal group according to the intraoperative rapid pathological results. The abnormal group included fatty liver, liver fibrosis, liver congestion and liver necrosis. The group t test was used to compare the Young′s modulus between abnormal group, fatty liver group, liver fibrosis group and normal group. The area under the ROC curve was calculated. The Young′s modulus at the highest Youden index was used as the cut-off value to distinguish between normal and abnormal donor livers, and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were calculated.

Results

There were 73 cases in normal group and 48 cases in abnormal group (21 cases of fatty liver, 18 cases of liver congestion, 5 cases of liver fibrosis, and 4 cases of liver necrosis) according to the results of intraoperative rapid pathological examination. The Young′s modulus of donor livers in abnormal group and normal group were (5.55±1.56) kPa and (3.64±0.70) kPa, respectively, with significant difference (t=7.964, P<0.05). When the cut-off value was 4.07 kPa, the Youden index was 0.628, which was the highest, and the sensitivity and specificity of SWE in the diagnosis of donor liver lesions were 83.3% and 79.5%, respectively. The Young′s modulus of fatty liver group and liver fibrosis group were (5.56±1.43) and (6.67±1.36) kPa, both of them were higher than that of normal group (t=5.974 and 4.933, P all<0.05). The range of Young′s modulus was (2.46-7.11) kPa and (5.62-9.11) kPa in liver congestion group and liver necrosis group, respectively.

Conclusions

SWE can quantitatively evaluate the hardness of liver tissue, and has a high specificity in the differentiation of abnormal and normal donor livers. SWE combined with conventional ultrasound can evaluate the quality of donor liver noninvasively and quantitatively, which has high clinical application value.

表1 121例肝移植供者基本资料
表2 SWE和术中快速病理检查对供肝病变的检出情况(例)
图1 剪切波弹性成像检查供肝病变的受试者工作特征曲线
图2 剪切波弹性成像检查供肝示例
1
张宁,卢实春. 移植供肝保护的研究进展[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志,2019,25(11): 868-871.
2
昌上请,朱海燕. 脑死亡后器官捐献的急诊方面研究[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志,2020,15(3): 368-370.
3
邵文雨,黄新立. 公民器官捐献供体质量对肝移植术后受体生存率的影响及其感染高危因素分析[J]. 临床外科杂志,2018,26(12): 913-917.
4
Horvatits T, Pischke S, Proske VM, et al. Outcome and natural course of renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients with severely impaired kidney function prior to transplantation[J]. United European Gastroenterol J, 2018,6(1): 104-111.
5
Nasralla D, Coussios CC, Mergental H, et al. A randomized trial of normothermic preservation in liver transplantation[J]. Nature, 2018,557(7703): 50-56.
6
全国肝胆肿瘤及移植病例协作组. 肝移植术后常见病变的病理诊断与分级指南(Ⅱ) [J/CD]. 实用器官移植电子杂志,2015,3(1): 1-7.
7
惠冉,师琳,房勤茂. 基于Ad-BN自适应深度卷积神经网络的肝脏纤维化超声诊断技术的研究[J]. 影像研究与医学应用,2019,3(23): 100-101.
8
余小玲. 超声造影诊断技术的应用现状与展望[J]. 中医药管理杂志,2017,25(10): 4-5.
9
罗春艳,田太成,丁奇伟. 超声造影诊断肝脏局灶性病变在基层医院的应用[J]. 世界中医药,2015,10(A02): 1034-1035.
10
刘娴娟,蒋永芳,马静. 肝硬化患者CT检测与肝穿刺活检病理诊断的对照分析[J]. 河北医学,2020,26(3): 455-458.
11
宋会明,郑媛媛,孙丽萍,等. 实时剪切波弹性成像在拉米夫定治疗乙肝纤维化过程中的疗效评估作用[J]. 中国现代医生,2020,58(2): 135-138.
12
Thumar V, Squires JH, Spicer PJ, et al. Ultrasound elastography applications in pediatrics[J]. Ultrasound Q, 2018,34(4): 199-205.
13
Ozturk A, Grajo JR, Dhyani M, et al. Principles of ultrasound elastography[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2018,43(4): 773-785.
14
Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, et al. Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications[J]. Theranostics, 2017,7(5): 1303-1329.
15
刘建华,严盛,郑树森. 瞬时弹性成像预测肝移植受者近期预后[J]. 浙江大学学报:医学版,2014,43(6): 678-682.
16
董常峰,冯程. 超声弹性成像在肝移植术后中期的应用价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志,2019,35(7): 620-622.
17
中华医学会传染病与寄生虫病学分会,肝病学分会. 病毒性肝炎防治方案[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志,2000,(6): 324-329.
18
中华医学会器官移植学分会,中国医师协会器官移植医师分会. 中国公民逝世后捐献供器官功能评估和维护专家共识(2016版)[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版,2016,10(4): 145-153.
19
Rawal N, Yazigi N. Pediatric liver transplantation[J]. Pediatr Clin North Am, 2017, 64(3): 677-684.
20
Kohli R, Cortes M, Heaton ND, et al. Liver transplantation in children: state of the art and future perspectives[J]. Arch Dis Child, 2018,103(2): 192-198.
21
Abu-Gazala S, Olthoff KM. Status of adult living donor liver transplantation in the United States: results from the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study[J]. Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2018,47(2): 297-311.
22
方彦鹏. 慢性肝病患者行SWE和常规超声检查诊断对敏感度和特异度的对比研究[J]. 影像研究与医学应用,2020,4(6): 212-213.
23
Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, et al. Elastography:a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues[J]. Ultrason Imaging, 1991,13(2): 111-134.
24
Roulot D, Czernichow S, Le Clésia H, et al. Liver stiffness values in apparently healthy subjects: Influence of gender and metabolic syndrome[J]. J Hepatol,2008,48(4): 606-613.
25
Ling W, Lu Q, Quan J, et al. Assessment of impact factors on shear wave based liver stiffness measurement[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013,82(2): 335-341.
26
Suh CH, Kim SY, Kim KW, et al. Determination of normal hepatic elasticity by using real-time shear-wave elastography[J]. Radiology, 2014,271(3): 895-900.
27
汪惠鹏,刘艳君,王学梅. 实时剪切波弹性成像在非酒精性脂肪肝分度诊断中的应用价值[J]. 临床超声医学杂志,2017,19(4): 249-251.
28
汤跃跃,韦嘉,陆永萍,等. 实时剪切波弹性成像对脂肪肝患者肝脏硬度的研究[C]//中华医学会感染病学分会,中华医学会肝病学分会. 中华医学会第十六次全国病毒性肝炎及肝病学术会议论文汇编,昆明,2013.
29
卢超政. 实时剪切波弹性成像对慢性乙型肝炎患者早期肝纤维化的诊断价值[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2016,27(19): 3656-3657.
30
洪勇强. 实时剪切波弹性成像在慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化和炎症分级中的应用价值[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制,2014,22(6): 737-739.
31
曾婕,吴莉莉,郑荣琴,等. 实时剪切波弹性成像检测肝脏弹性模量与肝纤维化分期的相关性研究[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志:电子版,2012,9(9): 781-784.
32
唐文博,徐清华,焦子育,等. 肝段下腔静脉压力对兔肝脏弹性影响的实验研究[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志:电子版,2013,10(5): 411-414.
33
徐清华,罗渝昆,唐文博,等. 声辐射力脉冲成像技术评估肝移植术后缺血型胆道病变的临床应用价值[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志:电子版,2014,7(2): 120-124.
[1] 高建松, 陈晓晓, 冯婷, 包剑锋, 魏淑芳, 潘林. 基于超声瞬时弹性成像的多参数决策树模型评估慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化等级[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 923-929.
[2] 王珏, 陈赛君, 贲志飞, 詹锦勇, 徐开颖. 剪切波弹性成像联合极速脉搏波技术评估颈动脉弹性对糖尿病性视网膜病变的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 636-641.
[3] 郭云云, 解翔, 彭梅, 姜凡, 毕玉, 何年安, 胡蕾, 杨杨, 王涛, 石玉洁, 陈冬冬. ACR-TIRADS与C-TIRADS分类分别联合二维剪切波弹性成像对甲状腺结节分类的诊断效能——多中心回顾性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 511-516.
[4] 黄珈瑶, 林满霞, 田文硕, 何璟怡, 赖佳明, 谢晓燕, 龙海怡. 健康成人胰腺剪切波弹性成像的可行性和测量值及其影响因素[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 524-529.
[5] 李坤河, 寇萌佳, 邝立挺. 肝移植术后二次气管插管的危险因素及预测模型的建立[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 366-371.
[6] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 上海医药行业协会. 中国肝、肾移植受者霉酚酸类药物应用专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 257-272.
[7] 陆闻青, 陈昕怡, 任雪飞. 遗传代谢病儿童肝移植受者术后生活质量调查研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 287-292.
[8] 范铁艳, 李君, 陈虹. 肝移植术后新发戊型病毒性肝炎的诊治经验[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 293-296.
[9] 陈朔, 陈峰, 程飞, 项捷. 糖原累积病Ⅰ型并发胰腺炎肝移植术后胰腺梗死一例[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 300-302.
[10] 汤鹏昊, 张武. 肠道微生态与肝移植围手术期并发症相关研究进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 303-307.
[11] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[12] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[13] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[14] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[15] 孔凡彪, 杨建荣. 肝脏基础疾病与结直肠癌肝转移之间关系的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 818-822.
阅读次数
全文


摘要