Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01): 14-19. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2018.01.004

Special Issue:

• Original Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The effect of warm ischemic related factors on the function of renal allograft after donation after cardiac death renal transplantation

Jinwen Lin1, Dongsheng He2, Linjun Lou1, Rending Wang1, Jianghua Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Kidney disease center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
    2. Intensive Care Unit, Hangzhou hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Medical and Health Group, Hangzhou 310022, China
  • Received:2017-11-09 Online:2018-02-25 Published:2018-02-25
  • Contact: Jianghua Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Jianghua, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

The effect of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury on the function of renal allograft was investigated after donation after cardiac death (DCD) renal transplantion.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of renal transplant donors and recipients at the Kidney Disease Center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University from May 2011 to June 2015. One year after transplantation, the recipients were classified into high renal function group [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ] ≥60 mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1) and low renal function group (eGFR <60 mL·min-1·(1.73 m2)-1. According to the DCD donor surgery record, the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) of the donors during different periods of warm ischemia in two groups were analyzed. The normal distribution measurement data were showed as the mean±standard deviation (±s), and the t-test was used to compare the basic characteristic data, donor SBP and SpO2 in the different warm ischemia periods between the two groups, except for gender. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used to compare the pathological scores of glomerular and glomerular of donor kidneys between two groups when organ procurement. Count data were expressed as a percentage. Chi-square test was used to compare the donor gender and DGF incidence in the two groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

By June 2016, all patients were followed up (28.4±2.8) months, ranged from 13.1 to 62.5 months. 340 recipients were eventually included, including 259 recipients in the high renal function group and 81 recipients in the low renal function group. The incidence of DGF was 14.7% (38/259) and 22.2% (18/81) in high and low renal function groups within 1 year after transplantation, with no significant difference (χ2=2.557, P>0.05). The average age and BMI of donors in the high renal function group were lower than those in the low renal function group, and the percentage of males and eGFR at the time of donation was higher than that in the low renal function group (t=-6.363, -2.049, 4.190, χ2=4.863, P all <0.05). The renal pathology scores of donors with high renal function were lower than those with low renal function, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-2.606, P<0.05). The recipients of the high renal function group were younger than the low renal function group, and the proportion of males was higher than the low renal function group, with significant difference (t=-2.790, χ2=9.658, P<0.05). In the high and low renal function groups, the initial SpO2 decreased by 40%, the average time from life support device withdrawal, different initial SpO2 with 90%, 80%, 70%, 60% of to SpO2 to SpO2 could not be measured, were (5.9±4.3) and (4.8±3.3), (8.0±5.2) and (6.1±4.4), (4.5±3.6) and (3.5±2.8), (4.0±3.7) and (2.9±2.4), (4.0±3.6) and (2.8±2.7), (3.6±3.5) and (2.4±2.5) minutes, with significant difference (t=2.088, 2.983, 2.328, 2.622, 2.557, 2.759, all P<0.05). In the high and low renal function groups, the average change rate of initial SpO2 declined by 10%, 40%, life support device withdrawal to SpO2 not detected, initial 60% SpO2 to SpO2 not detected were (2.40±1.78) and (2.90±1.70), (8.71±6.96) and (15.01±12.97), (19.60±17.49) and (25.80±22.85), (22.41±15.94) and (29.93±19.36) percentage per minute, with significant difference (t=-2.230, -5.647, -2.577, -3.514, P all <0.05).

Conclusions

The prognosis of DCD renal transplantation was influenced by the general factors such as donor and recipient age and BMI. The high and low renal function recipients had different high and low SpO2 time intervals and different rates of change derived from the DCD donors. During DCD renal transplantation, optimized surgical procedures should be taken to minimize the low SpO2 duration, so that the warm ischemia damage of the donor would be alleviated to acheive a better prognosis of tranplant.

Key words: Donation after cardiac death, Renal transplantation, Warm ischemia, Systolic blood pressure, Oxygen saturation, Prognosis

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 0571-87236589 E-mail: yizhi@zju.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd