切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 158 -162. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2025.03.007

论著

潜在脑死亡器官捐献供者早期识别GCS-P-R量表构建及效果分析
廖苑1, 陈丽2, 梁玉坚3, 徐桂兴4,()   
  1. 1510062 广州,中山大学附属第一医院人体器官获取组织
    2510062 广州,中山大学附属第一医院重症医学科
    3510062 广州,中山大学附属第一医院儿科
    4510062 广州,中山大学附属第一医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-17 出版日期:2025-06-25
  • 通信作者: 徐桂兴

Construction and effectiveness analysis of the GCS-P-R scale in identifying potential brain death donors

Yuan Liao1, Li Chen2, Yujian Liang3, Guixing Xu4,()   

  1. 1Organ Procurement Organization, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510062, China
    2Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510062, China
    3Department of Pediatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510062, China
    4Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510062, China
  • Received:2024-09-17 Published:2025-06-25
  • Corresponding author: Guixing Xu
引用本文:

廖苑, 陈丽, 梁玉坚, 徐桂兴. 潜在脑死亡器官捐献供者早期识别GCS-P-R量表构建及效果分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 158-162.

Yuan Liao, Li Chen, Yujian Liang, Guixing Xu. Construction and effectiveness analysis of the GCS-P-R scale in identifying potential brain death donors[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(03): 158-162.

目的

基于格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、脑干反射和自主呼吸评估,构建易用且更准确的量表,用于潜在脑死亡器官捐献(DBD)供者的早期识别。

方法

回顾性纳入2021年1月1日至2023年6月30日中山大学附属第一医院收治并最终判定为脑死亡的昏迷状神经重症患者,作为回顾组(n=175)。依据现有和本院既往研究,记录此类患者向脑死亡进展的相关参数,包含GCS、脑干反射(如瞳孔对光反射、角膜反射和前庭眼反射等)和自主呼吸状态。脑死亡判定依据中国现行的脑死亡判定标准,由本中心脑死亡判定专家完成。在回顾组中,筛选脑损伤发生后14 d内进展为脑死亡的相关因素,构建GSC-瞳孔对光反射-自主呼吸量表(以下简称GCS-P-R量表)。2023年7月1日至2024年1月31日期间,前瞻性纳入本中心收治并最终判定为脑死亡的昏迷状神经重症患者,作为前瞻组(n=51),验证GCS-P-R量表的预测效能。计量资料组间比较采用成组t检验,采用Logistic回归分析昏迷状神经重症患者在脑损伤后14 d内进展为脑死亡的危险因素。计算GCS-P-R量表和GCS判定昏迷状神经重症患者在脑损伤后14 d内进展为脑死亡的灵敏度和特异度,并采用χ2检验进行比较。P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

回顾组患者中,GCS=3分(OR=3.86,95%CI:1.57~18.21),一侧瞳孔对光反射消失(OR=6.83,95%CI:4.35~19.34)和自主呼吸频率<设定频率(OR=4.16,95%CI:1.63~15.52)是昏迷状神经重症患者在脑损伤后14 d内进展为脑死亡的危险因素。GCS-P-R量表评分≤0可用于潜在DBD供者的早期识别。前瞻组患者中41例(80.4%)在脑损伤后14 d内进展为脑死亡。GCS-P-R量表评分≤0分和GSC≤6分预测在脑损伤后14 d内进展为脑死亡的灵敏度分别为92.7%和100%,特异度分别为43.5%和0,二者灵敏度差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.898,P<0.05),提示构建的GCS-P-R量表预测效能优于GCS。

结论

引入瞳孔对光反射和自主呼吸评估的GCS-P-R量表,能够更准确地预测昏迷状神经重症患者在14 d内是否进展为脑死亡,可早期识别潜在DBD供者。

Objective

To early identify the potential brain death donors, a user-friendly and more accurate scale was constructed based on the Glasgow coma scale (GCS), brainstem reflex and spontaneous respiration assessment.

Methods

From January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2023, neurocritical patients in coma, admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of SYSU and determined as brain death ultimately were retrospectively included as the retrospective group (n=175). Based on existing and previous studies of our center, the factors related to the progression to brain death of such patients were recorded, including GCS, brainstem reflexes (such as pupillary light reflex, corneal reflex, and vestibulo-ocular reflex), and spontaneous respiratory status. Brain death determination was according to the current criteria for brain death determination in China, and was completed by specialized doctors in our center. In the retrospective group, the relevant factors of the progression to brain death within 14 d after brain injury were screened, and were utilized to bulid the GCS-pupillary light reflex (P)-spontaneous respiratory (R) scale. From July 1, 2023 to January 31, 2024, the comatose neurocritical patients, admitted to our hospital and determined as brain death ultimately, were prospectively included as the prospectively group (n=51). In the prospectively group, the the efficacy of constructed GCS-P-R scale was verified. The comparison of quantitative data between groups was conducted with group t-test, and Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for the progression of brain death in comatose neurocritical patients within 14 d after brain injury. The sensitivity and specificity of GCS-P-R scale and GCS were caculated in determining the progression to brain death in comatose neurocritical patients within 14 d after brain injury, and compared with chi square test. P<0.05 was indicated statistical significance of the difference.

Results

In the retrospective group, statistical analysis showed that GCS=3 (OR=3.86, 95%CI: 1.57-18.21), disappearance of light reflex in unilateral pupil (OR=6.83, 95%CI: 4.35-19.34), and the frequency of spontaneous respiratory less than the set frequency (OR=4.16, 95%CI: 1.63-15.52) were the related factors with the progression to brain death within 14 d after brain injury. The GCS-P-R scale score≤0 can be used for early identification of potential organ donors after brain death. In the prospective group, 41 cases (80.4%) progressed to brain death within 14 d after brain injury. According to the GCS-P-R scale score ≤ 0, the sensitivity and specificity of predicting brain death progression within 14 d after brain injury were 92.7% and 43.5%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of predicting brain death within 14 d after brain injury based on GCS ≤ 6 were 100% and 0, respectively, the difference of sensitivity between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2=4.898, P<0.05), indicating that the constructed GCS-P-R scale has better predictive performance than GCS.

Conclusions

The GCS-P-R scale which includes pupillary light reflex and spontaneous respiratory assessment, can more accurately predict the progression to brain death within 14 d in comatose neurocritical patients, and can be used for early identification of potential organ donors after brain death.

表1 回顾组昏迷状神经重症患者在脑损伤后14 d内进展为脑死亡危险因素Logistic回归分析结果(n=175)
表2 潜在脑死亡器官捐献供者早期识别GCS-P-R量表
表3 GCS-P-R量表评分判定昏迷状神经重症患者在脑损伤后14 d内进展为脑死亡的预测效能(例)
表4 GCS判定昏迷状神经重症患者在脑损伤后14 d内进展为脑死亡的预测效能(例)
1
江文诗,侯峰忠. 全球视野下中国人体器官捐献事业的高质量发展:2010~2024[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志:电子版2024, 18(4): 204-212.
2
Tommasino N, Saravia M, Rodriguez A, et al. Epidemiologic and evolutionary profile of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage with Glasgow coma scale score of 8 or less who entered the follow-up program of the National Institute of Donation and Transplantation[J]. Transplant Proc, 2018, 50(2):405-407.
3
Xu G, Guo Z, Liang W, et al. Prediction of potential for organ donation after circulatory death in neurocritical patients[J]. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2018, 37(3):358-364.
4
徐桂兴,刘华,于萍,等. 急性神经重症患者7天内进展为脑死亡的预测评分[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志2020, 6(2):81-85.
5
徐桂兴,郑东华,刘华,等. 基于自主呼吸停止预测的潜在脑死亡供者的早期识别[J]. 中华器官移植杂志2021, 42(2):87-90.
6
国家卫生健康委员会脑损伤质控评价中心,中华医学会神经病学分会神经重症协作组,中国医师协会神经内科医师分会神经重症专业委员会. 中国成人脑死亡判定标准与操作规范(第二版)[J]. 中华医学杂志2019, 99(17):1288-1292.
7
国家卫生健康委员会脑损伤质控评价中心. 中国儿童脑死亡判定标准与操作规范[J]. 中华儿科杂志2019, 57(5):331-335.
8
国家卫生健康委员会脑损伤质控评价中心,中华医学会神经病学分会神经重症协作组,中国医师协会神经内科医师分会神经重症专业委员会. 脑死亡判定标准与操作规范:专家补充意见(2021)[J]. 中华医学杂志2021, 101(23):1758-1765.
9
国家卫生健康委员会脑损伤质控评价中心,中华医学会神经病学分会神经重症协作组,中国医师协会神经内科医师分会神经重症专业委员会. 脑死亡判定实施与管理:专家指导意见(2021)[J]. 中华医学杂志2021, 101(23):1766-1771.
10
宿英英,刘刚,钱素云,等. 脑死亡判定精细化质控管理规范(2022版)[J]. 中国卫生质量管理2022, 29(12):23-28.
11
谢良波,夏秋翔,曾宪鹏,等.《移植器官质量与安全指南(第6版)》解读——供者及器官的评估和选择标准[J]. 器官移植2020, 11(4): 487-491.
12
Mizraji R, Perez-Protto S, Etchegaray A, et al. Brain death epidemiology in Uruguay and utilization of the Glasgow coma score in acute brain injured patients as a predictor of brain death[J]. Transplant Proc, 2009, 41(8):3489-3491.
13
van Dijck JT, Reith FC, van Erp IA, et al. Decision making in very severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow coma scale 3-5): a literature review of acute neurosurgical management[J]. J Neurosurg Sci, 2018, 62(2):153-177.
14
Brennan PM, Murray GD, Teasdale GM. Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 1: the GCS-pupils score:an extended index of clinical severity[J]. J Neurosurg, 2018, 128(6):1612-1620.
15
Chico-Fernández M, Abelardo Barea-Mendoza J, Servià-Goixart L, et al. Factors associated with death due to trauma in patients with a Glasgow coma scale score of 3 and bilateral fixed dilated pupils[J]. Emergencias, 2021, 33(2):121-127.
16
Bertotti MM, Martins ET, Areas FZ, et al. Glasgow coma scale pupil score (GCS-P) and the hospital mortality in severe traumatic brain injury: analysis of 1,066 Brazilian patients[J]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 2023, 81(5):452-459.
17
Wijdicks EF, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, et al. Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score[J]. Ann Neurol, 2005, 58(4):585-593.
18
Zappa S, Fagoni N, Bertoni M, et al; Imminent Brain Death (IBD) Network Investigators. Determination of imminent brain death using the full outline of Unresponsiveness score and the Glasgow coma scale: a prospective, multicenter, pilot feasibility study[J]. J Intensive Care Med, 2020, 35(2):203-207.
19
Ahmadi S, Sarveazad A, Babahajian A, et al. Comparison of Glasgow coma scale and full outline of Unresponsiveness score for prediction of in-hospital mortality in traumatic brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2023, 49(4):1693-1706.
[1] 薛武军. 发展新质生产力,以OPO 学科化推动建立我国完善的器官捐献体系[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 398-402.
[2] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 腹部常温区域机械灌注在以循环标准判定死亡的遗体器官捐献中的临床应用专家共识[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 386-397.
[3] 国家人体捐献器官获取质量控制中心, 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 中国医院协会器官获取与分配工作委员会, 中国器官移植发展基金会. 中国器官捐献五年提升计划[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 275-277.
[4] 江文诗, 侯峰忠. 全球视野下中国人体器官捐献事业的高质量发展:2010~2024[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 204-212.
[5] 国家人体捐献器官获取质量控制中心, 中国医院协会器官获取与分配工作委员会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会移植质控专业委员会. 成人脑死亡潜在器官捐献者的护理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 193-203.
[6] 霍枫, 李智霞, 季茹, 谭晓宇, 范晓礼, 叶啟发. 以循环标准判定死亡的遗体器官捐献分类标准、实施流程及需要注意的问题[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 213-221.
[7] 裘妃, 高志刚, 汪伟, 王晓豪, 杨子浩, 陈青江, 盛美君, 赵杭燕. 儿童器官获取组织和器官移植管理体系的探索与实践[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 93-97.
[8] 王惠英, 孙永康, 武小桐. 省级器官获取组织与医疗机构间协同联动提高器官捐献率的方法探讨[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 12-16.
[9] 黄伟, 叶啟发, 范晓礼, 金律, 艾紫叶, 刘麟炯, 那淑芳. 中国人体捐献器官获取质量控制体系建设[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 338-342.
[10] 季茹, 赵婕, 程子韵, 蒲苗, 赵洪涛, 霍枫. 美国器官移植体系未来发展指导意见及对我国的启示[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 332-337.
[11] 江文诗, 何湘湘. 全球及我国器官捐献发展特征分析与学科建设[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 280-286.
[12] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[13] 王明, 杨程凯, 吴小雅, 沈佳佳, 黄兴华, 吕立志, 蔡秋程, 杨芳, 刘建勇, 江艺. 逆灌注法DCD供肝对肝移植术后早期肝功能恢复的影响及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 33-38.
[14] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[15] 黄立锋. 重症患者的早期识别[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 128-128.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?