切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (04) : 205 -209. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2020.04.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

供肾零点活检病理结果与移植肾功能延迟恢复的相关研究
胡筱筠1, 郑瑾1, 李杨1, 田晓辉1, 田普训1, 潘晓鸣1, 项和立1, 丁小明1, 丁晨光1, 薛武军1,()   
  1. 1. 710061 西安交通大学第一附属医院肾移植科
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-28 出版日期:2020-08-25
  • 通信作者: 薛武军
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81970668)

Correlation between allograft zero-time biopsy results and kidney transplant recipients with delayed graft function after transplantation

Xiaojun Hu1, Jin Zheng1, Yang Li1, Xiaohui Tian1, Puxun Tian1, Xiaoming Pan1, Heli Xiang1, Xiaoming Ding1, Chenguang Ding1, Wujun Xue1,()   

  1. 1. Institute of Kidney Transplantation, the First Affiliated Hospital, Medical College of Xi′an Jiaotong University, Xi′an 710061, China
  • Received:2019-08-28 Published:2020-08-25
  • Corresponding author: Wujun Xue
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xue Wujun, Email:
引用本文:

胡筱筠, 郑瑾, 李杨, 田晓辉, 田普训, 潘晓鸣, 项和立, 丁小明, 丁晨光, 薛武军. 供肾零点活检病理结果与移植肾功能延迟恢复的相关研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 205-209.

Xiaojun Hu, Jin Zheng, Yang Li, Xiaohui Tian, Puxun Tian, Xiaoming Pan, Heli Xiang, Xiaoming Ding, Chenguang Ding, Wujun Xue. Correlation between allograft zero-time biopsy results and kidney transplant recipients with delayed graft function after transplantation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(04): 205-209.

目的

探讨供肾零点活检病理结果与肾移植术后并发移植肾功能延迟恢复(DGF)的关系。

方法

回顾性分析西安交通大学第一附属医院肾移植科2018年5月至2019年4月实施的心脏死亡器官捐献(DCD)肾移植供、受者临床资料。采用零点活检病理结果评估供肾质量,并按照Banff 2013标准、Remuzzi评分及马里兰病理指数(MAPI)对供肾进行病理分级和评分。肾小球数量≥7个,小动脉数量≥2支为合格标本。根据受者肾移植术后是否发生DGF,将其分为DGF组和非DGF组。采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较两组供肾肾小球硬化率、小动脉玻璃样变率、Banff 2013标准评分、Remuzzi评分和MAPI评分。采用卡方检验比较两组供肾肾间质纤维化、肾小管萎缩、小动脉内膜纤维化增厚、小动脉管壁透明样变、肾小管损伤/坏死及肾小球内微血栓发生情况。采用logistic回归分析供肾零点活检病理结果与DCD肾移植术后并发DGF的关系。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

最终纳入133例受者,其中DGF组26例,DGF发生率为19.5%,非DGF组107例。133例合格肾穿刺标本中,平均获得肾小球数量(13±5)个,中位肾小球硬化率5.8%(0~13.3%),中位小动脉数量5支(3~6支),中位小动脉玻璃样变率0(0~11%),肾间质纤维化占47.4%(63/133),肾小管萎缩占48.1%(64/133),小动脉内膜纤维化增厚占58.6%(78/133),小动脉管壁透明样变占36.8%(49/133),未见肾小球内微血栓,所有供肾均合并不同程度肾小管损伤/坏死。两组受者供肾肾间质纤维化、肾小管萎缩、肾小管损伤/坏死以及Remuzzi评分差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.65、7.92和16.81,Z=-2.02,P均<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示肾小管损伤/坏死是肾移植术后并发DGF的独立危险因素。

结论

供肾零点活检病理学评估对于预测肾移植短期预后具有一定价值,在供者维护和器官保存过程中应尽可能避免造成肾小管缺血/坏死,以降低DGF发生风险。

Objective

To analyze the correlation between allograft zero-time biopsy results and kidney transplant recipients with delayed graft function (DGF) after transplantation.

Methods

The clinical data of kidney transplant recipients and donors in the Institute of Kidney Transplantation, the First Affiliated Hospital, Medical College of Xi′an Jiaotong University from May 2018 to April 2019 were retrospectively analysed, all the donors were donation after cardiac death (DCD). Zero-time biopsy was used to assess the quality of donor kidneys. Banff 2013 criteria, Remuzzi score and Maryland aggregate pathology index (MAPI) were used to assess the pathology grades and scores in the pre-transplant biopsy. Eligible samples were defined as >7 glomerulus and >2 arterioles. According to the occurrence of DGF, the kidney transplant recipients were divided into DGF group and non-DGF group. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare glomerulus sclerosis rate, arteriole hyalinosis rate, Banff 2013 criteria scores, Remuzzi scores and MAPI scores between the 2 groups. Chi-square test was utilized to compare renal interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, thickening of the arteriole wall, hyaline degeneration of arteriole, renal tubule injury/necrosis and microthrombus in glomerulus between the 2 groups. Logistic regression model was used to analyze the correlation between allograft zero-time biopsy results and DGF of transplant kidney.

Results

133 recipients were enrolled in this study, 26(19.5%) recipients developed DGF (DGF group). There were 107 recipients in non-DGF group. Among the eligible samples of donor kidneys, the average amount of glomeruli were (13±5), the median glomerulus sclerosis rate was 5.8%(0-13.3%), the median amount of arterioles were 5(3-6), the median hyaline degeneration rate of arteriole was 0(0-11%), 47.4%(63/133) of the kidneys had interstitial fibrosis, 48.1%(64/133) of the kidneys had tubular atrophy, 58.6%(78/133) of the kidneys had arterial intimal fibrosis thickening, 36.8%(49/133) of the kidneys had hyaline degeneration in the arterial wall, none of the kidneys had glomerular micro thrombosis, all kidneys had various renal tubule injury/necrosis. The renal interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, renal tubule injury/necrosis and Remuzzi scores between the 2 groups had significant difference (χ2=7.65, 7.92 and 16.81, Z=-2.02, all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression model shown that renal tubule injury/necrosis was an independent risk factor of DGF in kidney transplant recipients.

Conclusions

Pre-implantation pathological assessment provide some guidance in predicting short-term transplantation outcome. We should try to avoid the factors that induce renal tubule injury/necrosis in the procedure of donor maintenance and organ harvesting for decreasing the occurrence risk of DGF.

表1 DCD肾移植术后发生DGF与未发生DGF受者供肾零点活检病理结果比较
表2 DCD肾移植术后并发DGF危险因素的logistic分析
1
中华医学会器官移植学分会,中国医师协会器官移植医师分会. 中国公民逝世后捐献供器官功能评估和维护专家共识(2016版)[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版,2016, 10(4): 1145-153.
2
薛武军. 公民逝世后器官捐献供肾评估方法及改善的研究进展[J]. 器官移植,2015,6(03): 131-133.
3
Nashan B, Abbud-Filho M, Citterio F. Prediction, prevention and management of delayed graft function: where are we now?[J]. Clinical Transplantation, 2016, 30(10): 1198-1208.
4
中华医学会器官移植学分会. 中国心脏死亡器官捐献工作指南(第2版)[J/CD]. 中华移植杂志:电子版,2012, 6(3): 221-224.
5
潘晓鸣,薛武军,刘林娟,等. 西北地区开展公民心脏死亡后捐献肾脏移植的报告[J]. 南方医科大学学报,2014, 34(3): 414-418.
6
项和立,薛武军,田普训,等. 机械灌注在公民逝世后器官捐献肾移植中的应用[J]. 中华器官移植杂志,2015, 36(6): 330-334.
7
Mandip P, Jayant K, Sameh AE. Long-term outcome of renal transplantation from older donors[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 354(19): 2071-2074.
8
Munivenkatappa RB, Schweitzer EJ, Papadimitriou JC, et al. The Maryland aggregate pathology index: a deceased donor kidney biopsy scoring system for predicting graft failure[J]. Am J Transplant, 2010, 8(11): 2316-2324.
9
中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肾移植术后随访规范(2019版)[J]. 器官移植,2019, 10(6): 667-671.
10
Schroppel B, Legendre C. Delayed kidney graft function: from mechanism to translation[J]. Kidney Int, 2014, 86(2): 251-258.
11
Fonseca I, Teixeira L, Malheiro J, et al. The effect of delayed graft function on graft and patient survival in kidney transplantation: an approach using competing events analysis[J]. Transpl Int, 2015, 28(6): 738-750.
12
Tingle SJ, Figueiredo RS, Moir JA, et al. Machine perfusion preservation versus static cold storage for deceased donor kidney transplantation[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 3(3): D11671.
13
Bassi R, Niewczas MA, Biancone L, et al. Metabolomic profiling in individuals with a failing kidney allograft[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(1): e169077.
14
De DJ, Kocabayoglu P, Moers C. Hypothermic machine perfusion in kidney transplantation[J]. Curr Opin Organ Transplant, 2016, 21(3): 294-300.
15
Naesens M. Zero-time renal transplant biopsies[J]. Transplantation, 2016, 100(7): 1425-1439.
16
Haas M, Sis B, Racusen LC, et al. Banff 2013 meeting report: inclusion of c4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection and antibody-associated arterial lesions[J]. Am J Transplant, 2014, 14(2): 272-283.
17
Liapis H, Gaut JP, Klein C, et al. Banff histopathological consensus criteria for preimplantation kidney biopsies[J]. Am J Transplant, 2017, 17(1): 140-150.
18
Hall IE, Reese PP, Weng FL, et al. Preimplant histologic acute tubular necrosis and allograft outcomes[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2014,9(3): 573-582.
19
Wang CJ, Wetmore JB, Crary GS, et al. The donor kidney biopsy and its implications in predicting graft outcomes: a systematic review[J]. Am J Transplant, 2015, 15(7): 1903-1914.
20
Lopes JA, Moreso F, Riera L, et al. Evaluation of pre-implantation kidney biopsies: comparison of Banff criteria to a morphometric approach[J]. Kidney Int, 2005, 67(4): 1595-1600.
21
Gaber LW, Moore LW, Alloway RR, et al. Glomerulosclerosis as a determinant of posttransplant function of older donor renal allografts[J]. Transplantation, 1995, 60(4): 334-339.
22
Matignon M, Desvaux D, Noёl L, et al. Arteriolar hyalinization predicts delayed graft function in deceased donor renal transplantation[J]. Transplantation, 2008, 86(7): 1002-1005.
23
刘磊,庞新路,尚文俊,等. 供肾移植前常规病理学评估对移植后早期肾功能的影响[J]. 中华器官移植杂志,2017, 38(38): 607-613.
[1] 邹永康, 石雍, 徐贤刚, 张帅民, 刘衍, 杨生鹏, 叶啟发, 陈根, 张毅. 肾移植术后手术切口米根霉感染伴菌血症一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 289-292.
[2] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 遗体捐献肾脏获取手术技术操作指南[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-265.
[3] 霍枫, 李智霞, 季茹, 谭晓宇, 范晓礼, 叶啟发. 以循环标准判定死亡的遗体器官捐献分类标准、实施流程及需要注意的问题[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 213-221.
[4] 吕玥彤, 靳梦圆, 周大为, 叶啟发. 机器人辅助下肾移植的临床进展与争议[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 242-246.
[5] 吕军好, 林锦雯, 张心怡, 陈江华. 细胞外囊泡在肾移植诊断和治疗中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 186-192.
[6] 尚丽红, 王志华, 张文艳, 朱琳茹, 周华. 内皮粘蛋白抗体与肾移植术后抗体介导排斥反应和移植肾预后的研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 165-170.
[7] 陆婷, 陈浩, 王雪静, 谭若芸, 彭宇竹. 肾移植术后一年发生代谢综合征的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 98-103.
[8] 郭明星, 徐烨, 徐菀佚, 赵莹, 刘冉佳, 潘晨, 崔向丽. 2017—2022年中国105家医院肾移植术后门诊受者免疫抑制剂用药分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 104-109.
[9] 张心怡, 吕军好, 陈大进. 2023年肾移植领域研究进展[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 7-11.
[10] 吴小山, 任桂灵, 朱杰东, 史天陆, 马葵芬. 肾移植受者围手术期霉酚酸暴露量及不良反应分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 17-21.
[11] 赵丽, 蔡瑞明, 赵纪强, 林民专, 陈志勇, 彭娟. 肾移植术后新发泌尿系统恶性肿瘤二例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 35-39.
[12] 陆婷, 姜巧玲, 孙黎, 王雪静. 加速康复外科在肾移植围手术期应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 55-59.
[13] 李晓宇, 许昕, 谌诚, 张萌, 韩文科, 林健. 肾移植受者新型冠状病毒感染合并肺炎支原体感染临床特点及诊疗分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 354-357.
[14] 王明, 杨程凯, 吴小雅, 沈佳佳, 黄兴华, 吕立志, 蔡秋程, 杨芳, 刘建勇, 江艺. 逆灌注法DCD供肝对肝移植术后早期肝功能恢复的影响及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 33-38.
[15] 张秋玥, 程羽, 牛雨田, 唐茂芝, 张克勤, 张懿, 郭亚楠, 涂增. 肾移植与人体微生态的相关性研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 207-213.
阅读次数
全文


摘要