切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华移植杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (01) : 11 -14. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3903.2021.01.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

成人肝移植术后抗体介导排斥反应的治疗
李俊杰1, 杨健1, 汪笑冬1, 郑虹1,()   
  1. 1. 300192 天津医科大学一中心临床学院 天津市第一中心医院器官移植科
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-22 出版日期:2021-02-25
  • 通信作者: 郑虹
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(81870444)

Treatment of antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation

Junjie Li1, Jian Yang1, Xiaodong Wang1, Hong Zheng1,()   

  1. 1. First Clinical Institute of Tianjin Medical University, Department of Liver Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China
  • Received:2020-09-22 Published:2021-02-25
  • Corresponding author: Hong Zheng
引用本文:

李俊杰, 杨健, 汪笑冬, 郑虹. 成人肝移植术后抗体介导排斥反应的治疗[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 11-14.

Junjie Li, Jian Yang, Xiaodong Wang, Hong Zheng. Treatment of antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Transplantation(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(01): 11-14.

目的

探讨合理有效的肝移植术后抗体介导排斥反应(AMR)治疗方案。

方法

回顾性分析2015年3月至2018年12月天津市第一中心医院成人肝移植术后发生AMR受者和同期肝移植术后发生急性细胞性排斥反应(ACR)受者的临床资料。收集两组受者围手术期资料、糖皮质激素使用剂量及维持时间、干预治疗以及病情转归等数据,比较常规抗排斥反应治疗方案对肝移植术后AMR与ACR的疗效差异。采用成组t检验比较两组供者年龄、受者年龄、术前终末期肝病模型(model for end-stage liver disease,MELD)评分以及肝移植至诊断ACR或AMR的时间间隔等指标。计数资料以百分比表示,采用Fisher确切概率法比较两组受者原发病、抗排斥反应治疗及联合干预情况。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

结果

AMR发生时间晚于ACR,AMR组和ACR组确诊时间分别为肝移植术后(413±97)d和(12±5)d (t=30.430,P<0.05)。AMR组糖皮质激素治疗时间长于ACR组,分别为(29±15)d和(11±6)d (t=6.122,P<0.05)。在接受标准免疫抑制方案的情况下,与ACR组相比,AMR组需要糖皮质激素冲击治疗的受者比例高于ACR组(8/8和21/50, P<0.05),需要给予联合干预治疗的受者比例也高于ACR组(3/8和0,P<0.05)。

结论

与ACR相比,AMR通常需要延长糖皮质激素使用疗程,并联合丙种球蛋白、血浆置换及其他方法进行联合干预。

Objective

To explore a reasonable and effective treatment scheme of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after liver transplantation.

Methods

The clinical data of AMR recipients after adult liver transplantation and acute cellular rejection (ACR) recipients after adult liver transplantation from March 2015 to December 2018 in Tianjin First Central Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The perioperative data, glucocorticoid dosage and maintenance time, intervention treatment and disease outcomes of the two groups were collected and compared the efficacy difference of conventional anti-rejection therapy on AMR and ACR after liver transplantation.

Results

The onset time of AMR was later than that of ACR, and the diagnosis time of AMR group and ACR group was (413±97) d and (12±5) d after liver transplantation, respectively (t=30.430, P<0.05). The duration of glucocorticoid treatment in AMR group was (29±15) d, which was longer than that in ACR group [(11±6) d] (t=6.122, P<0.05). In the case of standard immunosuppressive regimens, the proportion of recipients requiring glucocorticoid shock therapy was higher in the AMR group than in the ACR group (8/8 vs. 21/50, P<0.05), and the proportion of recipients requiring combined intervention was higher in the AMR group than in the ACR group (3/8 vs. 0, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with ACR, AMR is usually necessary to extend the course of glucocorticoid therapy, combined with gamma globulin, plasma exchange and other interventions.

表1 肝移植术后发生AMR和ACR受者临床资料
图1 1例发生抗体介导排斥反应且供者特异性抗体阳性受者的肝穿刺活检病理表现
图2 1例发生抗体介导排斥反应受者的肝穿刺活检病理表现
1
Lee EC, Kim SH, Park SJ. Outcomes after liver transplantation in accordance with ABO compatibility: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2017, 23(35): 6516-6533.
2
Valenzuela NM, Reed EF. Antibody-mediated rejection across solid organ transplants: manifestations, mechanisms, and therapies[J]. Journal Clin Invest, 2017,127(7): 2492-2504.
3
Lee M. Antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplant[J]. Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2017, 46(2): 297-309.
4
Djamali A, Kaufman DB, Ellis TM, et al. Diagnosis and management of antibody-mediated rejection: current status and novel approaches[J]. Am J Transplant, 2014,14(2): 255-271.
5
Wozniak LJ, Naini BV, Hickey MJ, et al. Acute antibody-mediated rejection in ABO-compatible pediatric liver transplant recipients: case series and review of the literature[J]. Pediatr Transplant, 2017, 21(1).
6
Kim PT, Demetris AJ, O′Leary JG. Prevention and treatment of liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection and the role of the 'two-hit hypothesis’[J]. Curr Opin Organ Transplant, 2016, 21(2): 209-218.
7
Hogen R, DiNorcia J, Dhanireddy K. Antibody-mediated rejection: what is the clinical relevance?[J]. Curr Opin Organ Transplantation, 2017,22(2):97-104.
8
Jadlowiec CC, Taner T. Liver transplantation: Current status and challenges[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2016, 22(18): 4438-4445.
9
Choudhary NS, Saigal S, Bansal RK, et al. Acute and chronic rejection after liver transplantation: what a clinician needs to know[J]. J Clin Exp Hepatol, 2017, 7(4): 358-366.
10
Taner T, Stegall MD, Heimbach JK. Antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation: current controversies and future directions[J]. Liver Transpl, 2014, 20(5): 514-527.
11
Demetris AJ, Bellamy C, Hübscher SG, et al. 2016 Comprehensive Update of the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology: Introduction of antibody-mediated rejection[J]. Am J Transplant, 2016,16(10): 2816-2835.
[1] . 肝移植治疗终末期肝病[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 1-.
[2] 李坤河, 寇萌佳, 邝立挺. 肝移植术后二次气管插管的危险因素及预测模型的建立[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 366-371.
[3] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 上海医药行业协会. 中国肝、肾移植受者霉酚酸类药物应用专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 257-272.
[4] 陆闻青, 陈昕怡, 任雪飞. 遗传代谢病儿童肝移植受者术后生活质量调查研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 287-292.
[5] 范铁艳, 李君, 陈虹. 肝移植术后新发戊型病毒性肝炎的诊治经验[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 293-296.
[6] 陈朔, 陈峰, 程飞, 项捷. 糖原累积病Ⅰ型并发胰腺炎肝移植术后胰腺梗死一例[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 300-302.
[7] 汤鹏昊, 张武. 肠道微生态与肝移植围手术期并发症相关研究进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 303-307.
[8] 中国器官移植发展基金会器官移植受者健康管理专家委员会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 国家肝脏移植质控中心. 肝移植受者雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂临床应用中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 193-204.
[9] 祝丽娜, 杨子祯, 张迪, 张勇, 蔡金贞, 王建红. 超声造影在肝移植术后肝动脉并发症中的应用价值[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 240-245.
[10] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[11] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[12] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[13] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[14] 王孟龙. 肿瘤生物学特征在肝癌肝移植治疗中的意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 490-494.
[15] 王晓东, 汪恺, 葛昭, 丁忠祥, 徐骁. 计算机视觉技术在肝癌肝移植疗效提升中的研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 361-366.
阅读次数
全文


摘要